Balancing Access, Well-Being, and Collaboration When Considering Hybrid Care Delivery Models in Primary Care Practices with Team-Based Care

References

1. 1.↵
   1. deMayo R,
   2. Huang Y,
   3. Lin ED,
   4. et al

   . Associations of telehealth care delivery with pediatric health care provider well-being. Appl Clin Inform 2022;13:230–41.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Wyte-Lake T,
   2. Cohen DJ,
   3. Williams S,
   4. et al

   . Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences with in-person, video, and phone modalities for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 2024;39:2179–86.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.
   1. Fitzsimon J,
   2. Patel K,
   3. Peixoto C,
   4. Belanger C

   . Family physicians’ experiences with an innovative, community-based, hybrid model of in-person and virtual care: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023;23:573.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Senft Everson N,
   2. Jensen RE,
   3. Vanderpool RC

   . Disparities in telehealth offer and use among US adults: 2022 health information national trends survey. Telemed J E Health 2024;30:2752–8.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Chang E,
   2. Penfold RB,
   3. Berkman ND

   . Patient characteristics and telemedicine use in the US, 2022. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e243354-e243354.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Jones AM,
   2. Fan J,
   3. Thomas-Olson L,
   4. Zhang W,
   5. McLeod CB

   . Continuation of telework in the post-pandemic era: Healthcare employees' preference and determinants. Healthc Manage Forum 2023;36:256–62.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Shih KK,
   2. Anderson A,
   3. Dai J,
   4. et al

   . Hybrid work from home clinical academic environment: a one–year follow-up survey of attitudes and beliefs of members of a department of palliative care, rehabilitation, and integrative medicine. J Palliat Med 2023;26:342–52.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Bento SP,
   2. Stewart C,
   3. Conroy C,
   4. et al

   . The telehealth tradeoff: a multimethod study of the benefits and challenges associated with maintaining treatment outcomes using a hybrid model of pediatric intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment. Clin J Pain 2023;39:307–18.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Rodriguez JA,
   2. Saadi A,
   3. Schwamm LH,
   4. Bates DW,
   5. Samal L

   . Disparities in telehealth use among California patients with limited English proficiency. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021;40:487–95.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Howland M,
    2. Tennant M,
    3. Bowen DJ,
    4. et al

    . Psychiatrist and psychologist experiences with telehealth and remote collaborative care in primary care: a qualitative study. J Rural Health 2021;37:780–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Andreadis K,
    2. Muellers K,
    3. Ancker JS,
    4. Horowitz C,
    5. Kaushal R,
    6. Lin JJ

    . Telemedicine impact on the patient-provider relationship in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Care 2023;61:S83–S88.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Ford J,
    2. Reuber M

    . Comparisons of communication in medical face-to-face and teleconsultations: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Health Commun 2024;39:1012–26.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bailey SR,
    2. Wyte-Lake T,
    3. Lucas JA,
    4. et al

    . Use of telehealth for opioid use disorder treatment in safety net primary care settings: a mixed-methods study. Subst Use Misuse 2023;58:1143–51.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Cantone RE,
    2. Fleishman J,
    3. Garvey B,
    4. Gideonse N

    . Interdisciplinary management of opioid use disorder in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2018;16:83–83.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Thomas DR

    . A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 2006;27:237–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Implementing High-Quality Primary Care: Rebuilding the Foundation of Health Care. The National Academies Press; 2021:448.
17. 17.↵
    1. Lanham HJ,
    2. McDaniel RR Jr.,
    3. Crabtree BF,
    4. et al

    . How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve quality in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009;35:457–66.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Miller WL,
    2. Crabtree BF,
    3. Nutting PA,
    4. Stange KC,
    5. Jaén CR

    . Primary care practice development: a relationship-centered approach. Ann Fam Med 2010;8 Suppl 1:S68–79; S92.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Halawa F,
    2. Madathil SC,
    3. Gittler A,
    4. Khasawneh MT

    . Advancing evidence-based healthcare facility design: a systematic literature review. Health Care Manag Sci 2020;23:453–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Gunn R,
    2. Davis MM,
    3. Hall J,
    4. et al

    . Designing clinical space for the delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28 Suppl 1:S52–S62.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Nguyen M,
    2. Armoogum J

    . Perception and preference for home-based telework in the COVID-19 era: a gender-based analysis in Hanoi, Vietnam. Sustainability 2021;13:3179.
22. 22.↵
    1. Edwards ST,
    2. Marino M,
    3. Solberg LI,
    4. et al

    . Cultural and structural features of zero-burnout primary care practices. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021;40:928–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed