Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Prenatal Care Coordination and Well-Child Visit Receipt in Early Childhood

David C. Mallinson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine August 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240302R2
David C. Mallinson
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL (DCM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Sampling procedure.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Incidence of any well-child visit or recommended well-child visit receipt by maternal Prenatal Care Coordination receipt, full sample.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Results from adjusted logistic regressions of any well-child visit on maternal Prenatal Care Coordination receipt.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 4.

    Results from adjusted logistic regressions of recommended well-child visit on maternal Prenatal Care Coordination receipt.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Sample Characteristics, Medicaid-Paid Births in Wisconsin During 2011–2015 (n = 113,347 Children)

    Maternal PNCC Receipt
    VariablesOverallNoneAssessment/ Care Plan OnlyService Uptake
    Sample size, N (row %)113,347 (100)83,903 (74.0)10,099 (8.9)19,345 (17.1)
    Maternal characteristics
    Age (years), mean (SD)26.1 (5.5)26.5 (5.4)25.7 (5.4)24.4 (5.6)
    Race/ethnicity, N (%)
     American Indian/Alaska Native (NH)2,183 (1.9)1,591 (1.9)285 (2.8)307 (1.6)
     Asian/Pacific Islander (NH)5,538 (4.9)4,582 (5.5)452 (4.5)504 (2.6)
     Black (NH)20,838 (18.4)13,592 (16.2)1,421 (14.1)5,825 (30.1)
     Hispanic18,437 (16.3)12,340 (14.7)1,999 (19.8)4,098 (21.2)
     White (NH)62,673 (55.3)49,119 (58.5)5,597 (55.4)7,957 (41.1)
     Multiple (NH)3,145 (2.8)2,228 (2.7)322 (3.2)595 (3.1)
     Other (NH)533 (0.5)451 (0.5)23 (0.2)59 (0.3)
    Nativity, N (%)
     Native-born (United States)97,725 (86.2)72,594 (86.5)8,694 (86.1)16,437 (85.0)
     Foreign-born15,622 (13.8)11,309 (13.5)1,405 (13.9)2,908 (15.0)
    Maternal education, N (%)
     No HS diploma22,912 (20.2)14,913 (17.8)2,307 (22.8)5,692 (29.4)
     HS diploma/equiv. only45,974 (40.6)33,508 (39.9)4,195 (41.5)8,271 (42.8)
     Some college36,778 (32.4)28,776 (34.3)3,133 (31.0)4,869 (25.2)
     Undergraduate degree6,580 (5.8)5,739 (6.8)413 (4.1)428 (2.2)
     More than undergraduate degree1,103 (1.0)967 (1.2)51 (0.5)85 (0.4)
    Marital status, N (%)
     Unmarried75,784 (66.9)53,205 (63.4)7,108 (70.4)15,471 (80.0)
     Married37,563 (33.1)30,698 (36.6)2,991 (29.6)3,874 (20.0)
    Residence county urbanicity, N (%)*
     Large central metro32,922 (29.1)22,265 (26.5)2,595 (25.7)8,062 (41.7)
     Large fringe metro9,599 (8.5)6,057 (7.2)2,123 (21.0)1,419 (7.3)
     Medium metro14,829 (13.1)12,866 (15.3)534 (5.3)1,429 (7.4)
     Small metro27,119 (23.9)20,169 (24.0)2,815 (27.9)4,135 (21.4)
     Micropolitan13,958 (12.3)11,057 (13.2)1,058 (10.5)1,843 (9.5)
     Non-core14,920 (13.2)11,489 (13.7)975 (9.6)2,457 (12.7)
    Chronic hypertension, N (%)
     Not reported110,835 (97.8)82,114 (97.9)9,901 (98.0)18,820 (97.3)
     Reported2,512 (2.2)1,789 (2.1)198 (2.0)525 (2.7)
    Chronic diabetes, N (%)
     Not reported112,181 (99.0)83,070 (99.0)9,999 (99.0)19,112 (98.8)
     Reported1,166 (1.0)833 (1.0)100 (1.0)233 (1.2)
    Delivery characteristics
    Parity, N (%)
     First birth36,495 (32.2)23,913 (28.5)3,246 (32.1)9,336 (48.3)
     Second birth34,353 (30.3)26,540 (31.6)3,200 (31.7)4,613 (23.9)
     Third birth22,040 (19.4)17,314 (20.6)1,981 (19.6)2,745 (14.2)
     Fourth or later birth20,459 (18.1)16,136 (19.2)1,672 (16.6)2,651 (13.7)
    Any congenital anomalies of newborn, N (%)†
     Not reported112,827 (99.5)83,536 (99.6)10,044 (99.5)19,247 (99.5)
     Reported520 (0.5)367 (0.4)55 (0.5)98 (0.5)
    Newborn NICU admission, N (%)
     Not reported105,121 (92.7)77,862 (92.8)9,438 (93.4)17,821 (92.1)
     Reported8,226 (7.3)6,041 (7.2)661 (6.6)1,524 (7.9)
    • Notes: All percents are column percents unless otherwise specified. Maternal PNCC receipt is measured during pregnancy.

    • ↵*Maternal residence county urbanicity is determined with the National Center for Health Statistics 2013 Urban-Rural Classification Scheme, which we linked to the maternal county of residence on the birth record using the county’s name. The only “large central metro” county in Wisconsin is Milwaukee County.

    • †Congenital anomalies as reported on the birth record include anencephaly, meningomyelocele/spina bifida, cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, limb reduction defect, cleft lip, cleft palate, down syndrome, suspected chromosomal disorder, and hypospadias.

    • Bold data defines the types of variable.

    • Abbreviations: HS, high school; NH, non-Hispanic; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; SD, standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table A1.

    Prenatal Care Coordination Initiation and Service Frequency Among Those with Any Program Exposure

    Any PNCCPNCC Assessment/Care Plan OnlyPNCC Service Uptake
    Sample size (Children), N29,44410,09919,345
    Trimester of first PNCC contact, N (%)
     1st trimester10,356 (35.2)3,309 (32.8)7,047 (36.4)
     2nd trimester19,088 (64.8)6,790 (67.2)12,298 (63.6)
     3rd trimester0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    PNCC service frequency, N (%)*
     One billed service––1,011 (5.2)
     Two billed services––2,016 (10.4)
     Three billed services––2,314 (12.0)
     Four billed services––2,342 (12.1)
     Five or more billed services––11,662 (60.3)
    • *PNCC service frequency was only measured among those with PNCC service uptake beyond the care planning stage.

    • Abbreviation: PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination.

    • View popup
    Table A2.

    Background Characteristics of the Sibling-Only Sample, Medicaid-Paid Births in Wisconsin During 2011–2015 (n = 35,373 Children)

    PNCC Receipt
    VariablesOverallNoneAssessment/Care Plan OnlyService Uptake
    Sample size, N (row %)35,373 (100)26,552 (75.1)3,082 (8.7)5,739 (16.2)
    Outcomes
    Any WCV receipt, %*
     Age: 0 to <1 year97.296.798.498.4
     Age: 1 to <2 years88.287.191.091.2
     Age: 2 to <3 years76.675.478.781.0
     Age: 3 to <4 years69.568.470.573.9
    Recommended WCV receipt, %*
     Age: 0 to <1 year (6+ visits)26.126.025.626.6
     Age: 1 to <2 years (3+ visits)38.938.241.840.4
     Age: 2 to <3 years (2+ visits)20.619.622.424.2
     Age: 3 to <4 years (1+ visits)69.568.470.573.9
    Maternal characteristics
    Age (years), mean (SD)25.5 (5.0)26.0 (5.0)25.0 (4.8)23.9 (5.0)
    Race/ethnicity, N (%)
     American Indian/Alaska Native (NH)803 (2.3)590 (2.2)121 (3.9)92 (1.6)
     Asian/Pacific Islander (NH)2,340 (6.6)1,937 (7.3)206 (6.7)197 (3.4)
     Black (NH)7,072 (20.0)4,542 (17.1)491 (15.9)2,039 (35.5)
     Hispanic5,725 (16.2)3,935 (14.8)608 (19.7)1,182 (20.6)
     White (NH)18,283 (51.7)14,672 (55.3)1,554 (50.4)2,057 (35.8)
     Multiple (NH)998 (2.8)740 (2.8)[Suppressed][Suppressed]
     Other (NH)152 (0.4)136 (0.5)[Suppressed][Suppressed]
    Nativity, N (%)
     Native-born (United States)30,414 (86.0)22,882 (86.2)2,631 (85.4)4,901 (85.4)
     Foreign-born4,959 (14.0)3,670 (13.8)451 (14.6)838 (14.6)
    Maternal education, N (%)
     No HS diploma7,925 (22.4)5,275 (19.9)795 (25.8)1,855 (32.3)
     HS diploma/equiv. only14,949 (42.3)11,189 (42.1)1,284 (41.7)2,476 (43.1)
     Some college10,547 (29.8)8,350 (31.5)887 (28.8)1,310 (22.8)
     Undergraduate degree1,672 (4.7)1,490 (5.6)[Suppressed][Suppressed]
     More than undergraduate degree280 (0.8)248 (0.9)[Suppressed][Suppressed]
    Marital status, N (%)
     Unmarried22,612 (63.9)15,985 (60.2)2,125 (68.9)4,502 (78.5)
     Married12,761 (36.1)10,567 (39.8)957 (31.1)1,237 (21.5)
    Residence county urbanicity, N (%)†
     Large central metro10,779 (30.5)7,250 (27.3)792 (25.7)2,737 (47.7)
     Large fringe metro2,574 (7.3)1,610 (6.1)627 (20.3)337 (5.9)
     Medium metro4,414 (12.5)3,858 (14.5)177 (5.7)379 (6.6)
     Small metro8,402 (23.8)6,393 (24.1)861 (27.9)1,148 (20.0)
     Micropolitan4,216 (11.9)3,404 (12.8)334 (10.8)478 (8.3)
     Non-core4,988 (14.1)4,037 (15.2)291 (9.4)660 (11.5)
    Chronic hypertension, N (%)
     Not reported34,705 (98.1)26,079 (98.2)3,030 (98.3)5,596 (97.5)
     Reported668 (1.9)473 (1.8)52 (1.7)143 (2.5)
    Chronic diabetes, N (%)
     Not reported35,102 (99.2)26,361 (99.3)3,052 (99.0)5,689 (99.1)
     Reported271 (0.8)191 (0.7)30 (1.0)50 (0.9)
    Delivery characteristics
    Parity, N (%)
     First birth7,008 (19.8)4,439 (16.7)666 (21.6)1,903 (33.2)
     Second birth11,651 (32.9)8,927 (33.6)1,064 (34.5)1,660 (28.9)
     Third birth8,081 (22.9)6,324 (23.8)702 (22.8)1,055 (18.4)
     Fourth or later birth8,633 (24.4)6,862 (25.8)650 (21.1)1,121 (19.5)
    Any congenital anomalies of newborn, N (%)‡
     Not reported35,236 (99.6)26,446 (99.6)[Suppressed][Suppressed]
     Reported137 (0.4)106 (0.4)[Suppressed][Suppressed]
    Newborn NICU admission, N (%)
     Not reported33,079 (93.5)24,851 (93.6)2,902 (94.2)5,326 (92.8)
     Reported2,294 (6.5)1,701 (6.4)180 (5.8)413 (7.2)
    • Notes: All percents are column percents unless otherwise specified. In accordance with data use agreements, we suppressed cells with small sample sizes.

    • *Measuring well-child visit receipt beyond the first year of life requires longer durations of continuous Medicaid enrollment post-birth. As such, our sample size (and the denominator for percentages) decreases as we measure later outcomes.

      • WCVs measured at age 1 to <2 years: 31,224 children (88.3% of sibling sample)

      • WCVs measured at age 2 to <3 years: 28,780 children (81.4% of sibling sample)

      • WCVs measured at age 3 to <4 years: 26,453 children (74.8% of sibling sample)

    • †Maternal residence county urbanicity is determined with the National Center for Health Statistics 2013 Urban-Rural Classification Scheme, which we linked to the maternal county of residence on the birth record using the county’s name. The only “large central metro” county in Wisconsin is Milwaukee County.

    • ‡Congenital anomalies as reported on the birth record include anencephaly, meningomyelocele/spina bifida, cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, limb reduction defect, cleft lip, cleft palate, down syndrome, suspected chromosomal disorder, and hypospadias.

    • Bold defines the types of variable.

    • Abbreviations: HS, high school; NH, non-Hispanic; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; SD, Standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table A3.

    Results from Conventional and Sibling Fixed Effects Logistic Regressions of Any Well-Child Visit on Maternal Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt, Unadjusted and Adjusted

    Conventional Logistic RegressionsSibling Fixed Effects Regressions
    UnadjustedAdjusted OR*UnadjustedAdjusted OR†
    Age: 0 to <1 years113,347113,34736,54636,546
    Sample size (Children), N
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any2.38 (2.15-2.64)1.92 (1.73-2.13)1.72 (1.24-2.39)1.48 (1.05-2.08)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.76 (1.52-2.03)1.57 (1.36-1.81)1.94 (1.22-3.09)1.75 (1.08-2.82)
      Service uptake2.92 (2.56-3.34)2.23 (1.95-2.55)1.59 (1.07-2.34)1.32 (0.88-1.98)
    Age: 1 to <2 years
    Sample size (Children), N91,65291,65232,10832,108
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.45 (1.37-1.52)1.31 (1.25-1.39)1.54 (1.29-1.83)1.24 (1.03-1.50)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.32 (1.22-1.43)1.25 (1.16-1.36)1.80 (1.38-2.35)1.40 (1.05-1.85)
      Service uptake1.52 (1.43-1.62)1.35 (1.27-1.44)1.42 (1.15-1.74)1.17 (0.94-1.45)
    Age: 2 to <3 years
    Sample size (Children), N81,53781,53729,56029,560
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.24 (1.19-1.29)1.14 (1.09-1.18)1.08 (0.95-1.23)0.93 (0.81-1.07)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.11 (1.04-1.17)1.06 (0.99-1.12)1.06 (0.87-1.29)0.90 (0.73-1.10)
      Service uptake1.32 (1.26-1.38)1.18 (1.13-1.24)1.09 (0.94-1.27)0.95 (0.81-1.11)
    Age: 3 to <4 years
    Sample size (Children), N73,59873,59827,15527,155
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.17 (1.13-1.21)1.08 (1.04-1.12)1.10 (0.97-1.25)1.01 (0.88-1.15)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.00 (0.95-1.06)0.96 (0.91-1.01)1.16 (0.96-1.41)1.05 (0.86-1.28)
      Service uptake1.27 (1.21-1.32)1.15 (1.10-1.20)1.08 (0.93-1.24)0.99 (0.85-1.14)
    • Notes: All conventional logistic regressions clustered standard errors at the mother-level. Conventional logistic regressions sample from all children, and sibling fixed effects regressions sample only from children with in-sample siblings.

    • *Adjusted regressions included the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; race/ethnicity; nativity; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity.

    • †Adjusted regressions included the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity.

    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination.

    • View popup
    Table A4.

    Results from Conventional and Sibling Fixed Effects Logistic Regressions of Recommended Well-Child Visit Receipt on Maternal Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt, Unadjusted and Adjusted

    Conventional Logistic RegressionsSibling Fixed Effects Regressions
    UnadjustedAdjusted*UnadjustedAdjusted†
    Age: 0 to <1 years (6+ WCVs)
    Sample size (Children), N113,347113,34736,54636,546
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.11 (1.08-1.15)1.11 (1.07-1.14)1.34 (1.19-1.50)1.22 (1.08-1.37)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.05 (0.99-1.10)1.05 (1.00-1.10)1.04 (0.88-1.24)0.99 (0.83-1.18)
      Service uptake1.15 (1.11-1.19)1.14 (1.10-1.18)1.51 (1.32-1.72)1.35 (1.18-1.55)
    Age: 1 to <2 years (3+ WCVs)
    Sample size (Children), N91,65291,65232,10832,108
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.13 (1.09-1.16)1.13 (1.10-1.17)1.29 (1.15-1.45)1.10 (0.98-1.24)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.13 (1.07-1.18)1.14 (1.08-1.19)1.36 (1.15-1.62)1.16 (0.97-1.39)
      Service uptake1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.27 (1.11-1.44)1.08 (0.94-1.23)
    Age: 2 to <3 years (2+ WCVs)
    Sample size (Children), N81,53781,53729,56029,560
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.19 (1.14-1.23)1.11 (1.06-1.15)1.03 (0.90-1.19)1.00 (0.86-1.15)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.09 (1.03-1.16)1.06 (0.99-1.13)0.98 (0.80-1.22)0.96 (0.77-1.19)
      Service uptake1.24 (1.19-1.30)1.13 (1.08-1.18)1.06 (0.90-1.24)1.01 (0.86-1.20)
    • Notes: All conventional logistic regressions clustered standard errors at the mother-level. Conventional logistic regressions sample from all children, and sibling fixed effects regressions sample only from children with in-sample siblings. The American Academy of Pediatrics provides the recommended number of annual well-child visits, which decreases with age: 6 visits at age 0 to <1 year; 3 visits at age 1 to <2 years; 2 visits at age 2 to <3 years; and 1 visit annually from age 3 to 21 years. Thus, the threshold for meeting the recommended WCV receipt decreases with age, and having any WCV receipt at age 3 to <4 years is equivalent to having the recommended receipt of WCVs.

    • ↵*Adjusted regressions included the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; race/ethnicity; nativity; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity.

    • †Adjusted regressions included the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity.

    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; WCV, well-child visit.

    • View popup
    Table A5.

    Additional Regression Results from Sensitivity Analyses

    Sample: Sibling Births OnlySample: No Newborn Congenital Anomaly*Sample: No NICU AdmissionSample: Continuous Medicaid Enrollment, 48 Months Post-birthSample: Controlling for Gestaional Hypertension and Gestational Diabetes
    Conventional Logistic RegressionConventional Logistic RegressionSibling Fixed Effects RegressionConventional Logistic RegressionSibling Fixed Effects RegressionConventional Logistic RegressionSibling Fixed Effects RegressionConventional Logistic RegressionSibling Fixed Effects Regression
    Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)Or (95% CI)
    Outcome: Any WCV Receipt
    Age: 0 to <1 years
    Sample size (Children), N35,373112,82735,122105,12131,44373,59826,453113,34736,546
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any2.01 (1.78-2.27)1.91 (1.73-2.12)1.46 (1.04-2.05)1.91 (1.72-2.12)1.34 (0.93-1.94)1.77 (1.51-2.08)1.66 (0.98-2.79)1.92 (1.73-2.12)1.49 (1.06-2.11)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.49 (1.26-1.75)1.56 (1.35-1.80)1.69 (1.04-2.74)1.58 (1.36-1.84)1.51 (0.90-2.54)1.46 (1.17-1.83)1.67 (0.82-3.39)1.57 (1.36-1.81)1.77 (1.09-2.86)
     Service uptake2.58 (2.17-3.06)2.22 (1.94-2.54)1.32 (0.88-1.99)2.19 (1.91-2.52)1.24 (0.80-1.93)2.03 (1.66-2.50)1.65 (0.89-3.05)2.23 (1.95-2.55)1.34 (0.89-2.01)
    Age: 1 to <2 years
    Sample size (Children), N31,22491,28231,02285,11627,84173,59826,45391,65232,108
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.26 (1.18-1.35)1.32 (1.25-1.39)1.25 (1.03-1.50)1.32 (1.25-1.39)1.27 (1.04-1.55)1.31 (1.23-1.40)1.16 (0.93-1.43)1.31 (1.24-1.38)1.25 (1.03-1.50)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.17 (1.06-1.29)1.25 (1.16-1.36)1.39 (1.04-1.84)1.25 (1.15-1.36)1.42 (1.06-1.91)1.26 (1.14-1.38)1.21 (0.88-1.66)1.25 (1.16-1.36)1.41 (1.06-1.87)
     Service uptake1.31 (1.21-1.42)1.35 (1.27-1.44)1.18 (0.95-1.46)1.36 (1.27-1.45)1.20 (0.95-1.51)1.35 (1.25-1.45)1.13 (0.89-1.45)1.35 (1.26-1.44)1.17 (0.94-1.45)
    Age: 2 to <3 years
    Sample size (Children), N28,78081,21028,59775,76625,70973,59826,45381,53729,560
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.09 (1.04-1.15)1.14 (1.09-1.18)0.93 (0.81-1.07)1.13 (1.09-1.18)0.89 (0.77-1.03)1.14 (1.09-1.19)0.93 (0.80-1.07)1.14 (1.09-1.18)0.93 (0.81-1.07)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.01 (0.94-1.09)1.06 (0.99-1.12)0.89 (0.73-1.10)1.05 (0.99-1.12)0.85 (0.68-1.05)1.05 (0.99-1.12)0.89 (0.71-1.10)1.06 (0.99-1.12)0.90 (0.73-1.10)
     Service uptake1.14 (1.08-1.21)1.19 (1.13-1.24)0.95 (0.82-1.11)1.18 (1.13-1.24)0.91 (0.77-1.08)1.20 (1.14-1.26)0.95 (0.81-1.12)1.18 (1.13-1.24)0.95 (0.81-1.11)
    Age: 3 to <4 years
    Sample size (Children), N26,45373,29926,28568,40023,65573,59826,45373,59827,155
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.05 (0.99-1.10)1.08 (1.04-1.12)1.02 (0.89-1.16)1.08 (1.04-1.12)1.00 (0.87-1.15)1.08 (1.04-1.12)1.01 (0.88-1.15)1.08 (1.04-1.12)1.01 (0.88-1.15)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only0.91 (0.85-0.98)0.96 (0.90-1.01)1.07 (0.88-1.30)0.97 (0.91-1.02)1.06 (0.86-1.30)0.96 (0.91-1.01)1.05 (0.86-1.28)0.96 (0.91-1.01)1.05 (0.86-1.28)
     Service uptake1.13 (1.07-1.19)1.15 (1.10-1.21)0.99 (0.86-1.15)1.15 (1.10-1.21)0.97 (0.83-1.13)1.15 (1.10-1.20)0.99 (0.85-1.14)1.15 (1.10-1.20)0.99 (0.85-1.14)
    Outcome: Recommended WCV Receipt
    Age: 0 to <1 years (6+ WCVs)
    Sample size (Children), N35,373112,82735,112105,12131,44373,59826,453113,34736,546
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.11 (1.07-1.14)1.21 (1.07-1.36)1.10 (1.07-1.14)1.20 (1.06-1.36)1.04 (0.99-1.08)1.17 (1.01-1.36)1.11 (1.07-1.14)1.22 (1.08-1.37)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.07 (1.01-1.13)1.04 (0.99-1.09)0.98 (0.82-1.17)1.04 (0.99-1.09)0.98 (0.81-1.18)1.00 (0.95-1.06)1.03 (0.82-1.28)1.05 (0.99-1.10)1.00 (0.83-1.19)
     Service uptake1.16 (1.12-1.21)1.14 (1.10-1.18)1.34 (1.17-1.54)1.14 (1.10-1.18)1.33 (1.15-1.55)1.06 (1.01-1.10)1.25 (1.06-1.48)1.14 (1.10-1.18)1.35 (1.18-1.55)
    Age: 1 to <2 years (3+ WCVs)
    Sample size (Children), N31,22491,28231,02285,11627,84173,59826,45391,65232,108
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.12 (1.08-1.16)1.13 (1.10-1.17)1.10 (0.98-1.24)1.13 (1.10-1.17)1.06 (0.93-1.20)1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.12 (0.98-1.28)1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.10 (0.97-1.24)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.11 (1.05-1.18)1.14 (1.08-1.19)1.16 (0.97-1.38)1.14 (1.08-1.19)1.10 (0.91-1.33)1.12 (1.07-1.19)1.21 (0.99-1.47)1.14 (1.08-1.19)1.16 (0.97-1.39)
     Service uptake1.13 (1.08-1.18)1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.08 (0.94-1.23)1.13 (1.09-1.18)1.04 (0.90-1.20)1.14 (1.09-1.18)1.08 (0.93-1.25)1.13 (1.09-1.17)1.07 (0.93-1.22)
    Age: 2 to <3 years (2+ WCVs)
    Sample size (Children), N28,78081,21028,59775,76625,70973,59826,45381,53729,560
    PNCC (Binary)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.08 (1.03-1.13)1.11 (1.06-1.15)1.00 (0.86-1.16)1.12 (1.07-1.16)0.96 (0.83-1.12)1.10 (1.06-1.15)0.96 (0.83-1.12)1.11 (1.06-1.15)0.99 (0.86-1.15)
    PNCC (Categorical)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.03 (0.95-1.11)1.06 (1.00 to 1.13)0.96 (0.77-1.19)1.07 (1.01-1.14)0.88 (0.70-1.10)1.05 (0.99-1.12)0.91 (0.73-1.13)1.06 (0.99-1.13)0.97 (0.78-1.20)
     Service uptake1.10 (1.04-1.16)1.13 (1.08-1.18)1.02 (0.87-1.20)1.14 (1.09-1.20)1.01 (0.85-1.20)1.13 (1.08-1.18)0.99 (0.84-1.18)1.13 (1.08-1.18)1.01 (0.86-1.19)
    • Notes: Maternal PNCC receipt is measured during pregnancy. All conventional logistic regressions cluster standard errors at the mother-level and adjust for the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; race/ethnicity; nativity; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity. All sibling fixed effects regressions adjust for the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity. The American Academy of Pediatrics provides the recommended number of annual well-child visits, which decreases with age: 6 visits at age 0 to <1 year; 3 visits at age 1 to <2 years; 2 visits at age 2 to <3 years; and 1 visit annually from age 3 to 21 years. Thus, the threshold for meeting the recommended WCV receipt decreases with age, and having any WCV receipt at age 3 to <4 years is equivalent to having the recommended receipt of WCVs.

    • *Congenital anomalies as reported on the birth record include anencephaly, meningomyelocele/spina bifida, cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, limb reduction defect, cleft lip, cleft palate, down syndrome, suspected chromosomal disorder, and hypospadias.

    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; WCV, well-child visit.

    • View popup
    Table A6.

    Results from Sibling Fixed Effects Logistic Regressions of Well-Child Visit Receipt on Maternal Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt, Stratified on Differential Exposure to Any Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt Across Pregnancies

    Subsample: Sibling Pairs with Constant PNCC Exposure or PNCC Exposure in the First Pregnancy Only (n = 30,936 Children [15,468 Pairs])Subsample: Sibling Pairs with Constant PNCC Exposure or PNCC Exposure in the Second Pregnancy Only (n = 28,312 Children [14,156 Pairs])
    Outcome: Any WCV Receipt
    Age: 0 to <1 years
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.66 (0.96-2.86)1.43 (0.79-2.59)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.88 (0.94-3.77)1.36 (0.64-2.93)
      Service uptake1.52 (0.81-2.82)1.48 (0.76-2.85)
    Age: 1 to <2 years
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.28 (0.98-1.69)1.18 (0.83-1.68)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.43 (0.99-2.06)1.36 (0.86-2.19)
      Service uptake1.20 (0.89-1.63)1.11 (0.77-1.62)
    Age: 2 to <3 years
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any0.88 (0.73-1.06)0.87 (0.67-1.14)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only0.80 (0.63-1.03)0.89 (0.62-1.28)
      Service uptake0.93 (0.75-1.14)0.87 (0.65-1.15)
    Age: 3 to <4 years
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.19 (0.99-1.43)0.80 (0.63-1.02)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.30 (1.01-1.69)0.79 (0.58-1.09)
      Service uptake1.14 (0.93-1.40)0.80 (0.62-1.04)
    Outcome: Recommended WCV Receipt
    Age: 0 to <1 years
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.36 (1.15-1.60)1.01 (0.80-1.27)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.06 (0.85-1.34)0.76 (0.57-1.02)
      Service uptake1.52 (1.27-1.82)1.18 (0.92-1.52)
    Age: 1 to <2 years
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.12 (0.94-1.33)1.00 (0.80-1.25)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.12 (0.89-1.41)0.97 (0.73-1.29)
      Service uptake1.12 (0.93-1.35)1.01 (0.80-1.28)
    Age: 2 to <3 uears
     PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Any1.10 (0.89-1.36)0.89 (0.69-1.15)
     PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
      None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
      Assessment/Care plan only1.04 (0.79-1.38)0.95 (0.68-1.32)
      Service uptake1.13 (0.90-1.42)0.87 (0.66-1.14)
    • Notes: All regressions included the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity. The American Academy of Pediatrics provides the recommended number of annual well-child visits, which decreases with age: 6 visits at age 0 to <1 year; 3 visits at age 1 to <2 years; 2 visits at age 2 to <3 years; and 1 visit annually from age 3 to 21 years. Thus, the threshold for meeting the recommended WCV receipt decreases with age, and having any WCV receipt at age 3 to <4 years is equivalent to having the recommended receipt of WCVs.

    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; WCV, well-child visit.

    • View popup
    Table A7.

    Post-Hoc Analysis: Cross-Tabulations of Well-Child Visit Receipt at 3 to <4 Years-Old by Maternal Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt, Stratified on Consistency of Prior Well-Child Visit Receipt (n = 73,598 Children)

    PNCC Receipt
    OverallNoneAssessment/Care Plan OnlyService Uptake
    Subsample: No WCVs, Age 0 to <3 years old
     Sample size (Children), N7476534747
     Any WCV receipt, Age 3 to <4 years old, N (Col. %)126 (16.9)105 (16.1)8 (17.0)13 (27.7)
    Subsample: 1 year with any WCVs, Age 0 to <3 years old
     Sample size (Children), N3,7062,966278462
     Any WCV receipt, Age 3 to <4 years old, N (Col. %)1,167 (31.5)896 (30.2)83 (29.9)188 (40.7)
    Subsample: 2 years with any WCVs, Age 0 to <3 years old
     Sample size (Children), N14,82510,9851,3812,459
     Any WCV receipt, Age 3 to <4 years old, N (Col. %)8,540 (57.6)6,239 (56.8)777 (56.3)1,524 (62.0)
    Subsample: 3 years with any WCVs, Age 0 to <3 years old
     Sample size (Children), N54,32038,7105,09510,515
     Any WCV receipt, Age 3 to <4 years old, N (Col. %)41,819 (77.0)29,706 (76.7)3,847 (75.5)8,266 (78.6)
    • Abbreviations: Col., column; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; WCV, well-child visit.

    • View popup
    Table A8.

    Post-Hoc Analysis: Results from Adjusted Conventional Logistic Regressions of Any Well-Child Visit at Age 3 to <4 Years-Old on Maternal Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt, Stratified on Consistency of Prior Well-Child Visit Receipt (n = 73,598 Children)

    Subsample: 0 to 2 Years of Any WCV Receipt Per Year, Age 0 to <3 Years Old (n = 19,278 Children)Subsample: 3 Years of Any WCV Receipt Per Year, Age 0 to <3 Years Old (n = 73,598 Children)
    PNCC (Binary), OR (95% CI)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Any1.14 (1.06-1.22)1.01 (0.96-1.06)
    PNCC (Categorical), OR (95% CI)
     None1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
     Assessment/Care plan only1.00 (0.90-1.11)0.91 (0.85-0.98)
     Service uptake1.23 (1.13-1.33)1.07 (1.01-1.13)
    • Notes: Maternal PNCC receipt is measured during pregnancy. All conventional logistic regressions cluster standard errors at the mother-level and adjust for the following control variables: maternal characteristics at delivery (age; race/ethnicity; nativity; education; marital status; residence county urbanicity; chronic hypertension; chronic diabetes) and parity.

    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PNCC, Prenatal Care Coordination; WCV, well-child visit.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 4
July-August 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prenatal Care Coordination and Well-Child Visit Receipt in Early Childhood
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prenatal Care Coordination and Well-Child Visit Receipt in Early Childhood
David C. Mallinson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Aug 2025, DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240302R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prenatal Care Coordination and Well-Child Visit Receipt in Early Childhood
David C. Mallinson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Aug 2025, DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240302R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The 4Cs of Primary Care, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence, and Improving Clinical Practice
  • The 4Cs of Primary Care, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence, and Improving Clinical Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Menstrual Equity: A Survey Study with ZIP-Code Level Analysis
  • Medical Student Attitudes Toward Advanced Practice Provider Independence Legislation
  • Implementation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Care Coordination
  • Child Health
  • Logistic Models
  • Medicaid
  • Pediatrics
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Care
  • Well-Child Visits
  • Wisconsin

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire