Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube

Clinician Advice and Active Weight Control in U.S. Adults: Absolute and Population Impacts

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Yubing Wang, PhD

Corresponding Author: Yubing Wang, PhD; Department of Human Movement Studies & Special Education, Old Dominion University.

Email: y8wang@odu.edu

DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250466R1

Keywords: Body Mass Index, Counseling, Epidemiology, NHANES, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Public Health, Weight Loss

Dates: Submitted: 12-09-2025; Revised: 02-20-2026; Accepted: 03-23-2026      

Status: In Press.

INTRODUCTION: Clinician counseling is recommended for weight management, but national evidence on absolute and population effects are limited. It is aimed to quantify the absolute and population effects of clinician advice on current weight-control behaviors, using risk difference (RD), risk ratio (RR), population attributable fraction (PAF), and number needed to advise (NNA), and to test heterogeneity by BMI, sex, age, and poverty-income ratio (PIR).

METHODS: NHANES data (2005–2020) from 28,994 adults was analyzed. Exposure was self-reported receipt of clinician advice to control/lose weight in the past 12 months (NHANES item); the outcome was self-reported current controlling/losing weight. Survey-weighted modified Poisson models with marginal standardization estimated adjusted risks, assessed prespecified interactions, and performed sensitivity analyses (augmented inverse probability weighting [AIPW], leave-one-cycle-out, ≥2 visits, complete case).

RESULTS: Advice was associated with RD 19.2 percentage points (95% CI, 19.1–19.3) and RR 1.34 (1.33–1.34); PAF 8.5% (7.1–9.9), ≈10.0 million adults; NNA 5.2 (5.2–5.3). Subgroup analyses showed heterogeneity by BMI, sex, and PIR; population impact was greatest among adults with obesity (PAF 10.1%, ≈5.3 million). The absolute impact of advice on weight-control behavior was larger in men than women. Lower-income adults had the largest absolute and population impacts (RD 25.6; PAF 12.2%, ≈2.6 million). Findings were robust across sensitivity checks.

CONCLUSIONS: Clinician advice is associated with meaningful absolute and population benefits. Absolute and population metrics provide actionable targets to strengthen universal counseling with proportionate support. 

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire