Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Fewer Abortions in States with More Family Physicians

Amanda Weidner
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2026, 39 (1) 167594; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2025.250295R1
Amanda Weidner
1 Department of Family Medicine University of Washington https://ror.org/00cvxb145
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    (2022) Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson Women's Health Organization et al. 19-1392:1-213. .
  2. ↵
    1. Smith M. H.,
    2. McGowan M. L.,
    3. Kerestes C.,
    4. Bessett D.,
    5. Norris A. H.
    (2024) Longitudinal impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization on abortion service delivery in Ohio, 2022‒2023. Am J Public Health 114(10):1034–1042, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307775, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307775. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Rader B.,
    2. Upadhyay U. D.,
    3. Sehgal N. K. R.,
    4. Reis B. Y.,
    5. Brownstein J. S.,
    6. Hswen Y.
    (2022) Estimated travel time and spatial access to abortion facilities in the US before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health decision. JAMA 328(20):2041–2047, doi:10.1001/jama.2022.20424, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.20424. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sauter S. R.,
    2. Wallace M. E.,
    3. Hernandez J. H.
    (2024) Unequal spatial consequences of abortion restrictions in Texas, 2021-2023. Am J Public Health 114(10):1024–1033, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307652, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307652. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation
    Abortion in the United States Dashboard. . 2025-3-27. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/abortion-in-the-u-s-dashboard/.
  6. ↵
    1. Madden N.,
    2. Trawick E.,
    3. Watson K.,
    4. Yee L. M.
    (2024) Post-Dobbs abortion restrictions and the families they leave behind. Am J Public Health 114(10):1043–1050, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Beshar I.,
    2. Corn M.,
    3. Blumenthal P. D.
    (2024) Two years in a post-Dobbs world: clinical, social and professional consequences. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 36(6):426, doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975, https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation
    (3 20, 2024) The Availability and Use of Medication Abortion. . 2024-12-4. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-availability-and-use-of-medication-abortion/.
  9. ↵
    1. Wetterer L.,
    2. Rosenfield H.,
    3. Gortler H.,
    4. Simmons M.
    (2025) Abortion in primary care. Prim Care Clin Off Pract 52(2):277–290, doi:10.1016/j.pop.2025.01.002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2025.01.002. .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Amico J. R.,
    2. Cheng T. L.,
    3. Godfrey E. M.
    (2018) Providing abortion services in the primary care setting. Prim Care Clin Off Pract 45(4):599–613, doi:10.1016/j.pop.2018.07.010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2018.07.010. .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Sobel L.
    (7 23, 2025) Planned Parenthood Remains in Limbo as Court Reviews Their Request to Block Federal Medicaid Funding Ban. . 2025-11-5. https://www.kff.org/quick-insights/planned-parenthood-remains-in-limbo-as-court-reviews-their-request-to-block-federal-medicaid-funding-ban/.
  12. ↵
    1. Godfrey E. M.,
    2. Rubin S. E.,
    3. Smith E. J.,
    4. Khare M. M.,
    5. Gold M.
    (2010) Women's preference for receiving abortion in primary care settings. J Womens Health 15409996 19(3):547–553, doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1454, https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1454. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Miles C.,
    2. Weidner A.,
    3. Summit A.K..,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Patient opinions on sexual and reproductive health services in primary care in rural and urban clinics. Contraception 114:26–31, doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.009. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Casas R. S.,
    2. Chuang C. H.
    (2020) Medication for abortion and miscarriage in primary care: important and possible for general internists. J Gen Intern Med 35(8):2256–2257, doi:10.1007/s11606-020-05919-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05919-7. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ruff A.
    (2024) Medication abortion and the role of internal medicine physicians. J Gen Intern Med 39(2):320–322, doi:10.1007/s11606-023-08537-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08537-1. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. DeVetter N.,
    2. Westfall J.,
    3. Westfall E.C.
    (2024) Family medicine residents desperate for abortion education. Fam Med 56(4):274, doi:10.22454/FamMed.2023.220499, https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2023.220499. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Wulf S.,
    2. Carvajal D. N.,
    3. Razon N..,
    4. et al.
    (2023) "They Go Hand in Hand": perspectives on the relationship between the core values of family medicine and abortion provision among family physicians who do not oppose abortion. J Am Board Fam Med 36(4):583–590, doi:10.3122/jabfm.2022.220301R2, https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220301R2. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Gray B. M.,
    2. Vandergrift J. L.,
    3. Stevens J. P.,
    4. Landon B. E.
    (2022) Evolving practice choices by newly certified and more senior general internists. Ann Intern Med 175(7):1022–1027, doi:10.7326/M21-4636, https://doi.org/10.7326/M21-4636. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Barreto T.,
    2. Jetty A.,
    3. Eden A.R.,
    4. Petterson S.,
    5. Bazemore A.,
    6. Peterson L.E.
    (2021) Distribution of physician specialties by rurality. J Rural Health 37(4):714–722, doi:10.1111/jrh.12548, https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12548. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission
    (6, 2021) Physician Acceptance of New Medicaid Patients: Findings from the National Electronic Health Records Survey. . 2026-8-12. https://www.macpac.gov/publication/physician-acceptance-of-new-medicaid-patients-findings-from-the-national-electronic-health-records-survey/.
  21. ↵
    1. Vichare A.,
    2. Bodas M.,
    3. Jetty A.,
    4. Luo Q. E.,
    5. Bazemore A.
    (2024) A few doctors will see some of you: the critical role of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) family physicians in the care of Medicaid beneficiaries. Ann Fam Med 22(5):383–391, doi:10.1370/afm.3140, https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3140. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. American Board of Family Medicine
    (2023) 2023 National Graduate Survey Report. . 2024-10-8. https://www.theabfm.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2023-National-Graduate-Survey-Report_NationalOnly.pdf.
  23. ↵
    1. Patel P.,
    2. Narayana S.,
    3. Summit A..,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Abortion provision among recently graduated family physicians. Fam Med 52(10):724–729, doi:10.22454/FamMed.2020.300682, https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2020.300682. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Summit A.K.,
    2. Lague I.,
    3. Dettmann M.,
    4. Gold M.
    (2020) Barriers to and enablers of abortion provision for family physicians trained in abortion during residency. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 52(3):151–159, doi:10.1363/psrh.12154, https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12154. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Maddow-Zimet I.,
    2. Kost K.,
    3. Finn S.,
    4. Chiu D.
    (9 23, 2020) Pregnancies, Births and Abortions in the United States: National and State Trends by Age. . 2025-6-28. https://osf.io/kthnf/overview.
  26. ↵
    1. Association of American Medical Colleges
    U.S. Physician Workforce Data Dashboard. . 2025-3-27. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/report/us-physician-workforce-data-dashboard.
  27. ↵
    1. Association of American Medical Colleges
    U.S. Physician Workforce Data Dashboard Methods. . 2025-6-20. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/data/us-physician-workforce-data-dashboard-methods.
  28. ↵
    1. Jones R.K.,
    2. Gibson C.,
    3. Philbin J.
    (6, 2024) The Number of Brick-and-Mortar Abortion Clinics Drops, as US Abortion Rate Rises: New Data Underscore the Need for Policies that Support Providers. . 2026-8-12. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-clinics-united-states-2020-2024.
  29. ↵
    1. US Census Bureau
    Urban and Rural: State-level 2020 and 2010 Census Urban and Rural Information for the U.S., Puerto Rico, and Island Areas sorted by state FIPS code. . 2025-6-20. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww2.census.gov%2Fgeo%2Fdocs%2Freference%2Fua%2FState_Urban_Rural_Pop_2020_2010.xlsx=BROWSELINK.
  30. ↵
    1. Idaho Physician Well-Being Action Collaborative
    (2, 2024) A Post Roe Idaho. . 2024-10-9. https://issuu.com/idahocsh/docs/final_post_roe_idaho_data_report_feb._2024.
  31. ↵
    1. Sherman C.
    (1 13, 2025) Democratic states train non-doctors on providing abortions to expand US access. . 2025-11-4. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/13/abortion-access-healthcare-workers-democratic-states.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family   Medicine: 39 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 39, Issue 1
1 Jan 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fewer Abortions in States with More Family Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Fewer Abortions in States with More Family Physicians
Amanda Weidner
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2026, 39 (1) 167594; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250295R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fewer Abortions in States with More Family Physicians
Amanda Weidner
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2026, 39 (1) 167594; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250295R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Appendix
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Impact of Race on Advanced Care Planning: Results of a Quality Improvement Project
  • Impact of a Primary Care Value-Based Compensation Model
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Access to Care
  • Family Physicians
  • Linear Regression
  • Primary Health Care
  • Secondary Data Analysis

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire