Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Special Collections
    • Abstracts In Press
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
EditorialEditorial

POEMs and PROMs

Dean A. Seehusen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine August 2026, 39 (1) 166265;
Dean A. Seehusen
1 Medical College of Georgia, Department of Family and Community Medicine Augusta University https://ror.org/012mef835
MD, MPH, CAQ-HALM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Practicing family physicians understand that taking the patient perspective into account is vital for good clinical care. This is a natural outcome of using the biopsychosocial model in the practice of medicine. Family medicine research should parallel this principle by including the patient experience when possible.

Medical research is constantly evolving. Much of the medical literature of the early 20th century was essentially expert opinion and anecdote. As scientific methods improved, disease-oriented evidence (DOE) became the dominant form of publication beginning in the middle of the century.1 Disease-oriented outcomes are very satisfying for physicians because they can generally be reliably measured and can be modified with readily available tools. From the physician’s perspective, a problem is identified, an intervention is made, and the problem improves.

Blood pressure can be easily measured and generally responds favorably to available medications. Let’s focus on blood pressure.

In the 1990’s, the evidence-based medicine revolution came onto the scene and the expectations for medical research outcomes changed rapidly.2 As evidence-based medicine was embraced, researchers started to focus not just on what could be easily measured, but what was really important. This mandated novel research methods and outcome measures.3 In the late 1990s, the term patient-oriented evidence that matters (POEM) was introduced as a contrast to DOE.4,5

Yes, blood pressure can be measured, and it can be lowered. But does lowering blood pressure result in fewer heart attacks and deaths?

POEMs keep patients at the center of medical research by asking questions that patients would want to know the answers to. This pattern paralleled the trend away from paternalism in clinical medicine and towards a shared-decision making approach to patient care.6 More recently, there has been a movement towards giving patients a direct voice in research outcomes.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are research metrics that are measured by collecting responses from the patients who are actually experiencing the outcomes.7 Just like understanding the lived experience of patients is vital to the long-term practice of medicine, without the input of patients, we cannot understand the full implication of clinical research. Paying attention to PROMs, in general, results in overall higher patient satisfaction.8 It is simply realistic to state that an intervention that improves important clinical measures of health such as blood pressure, cholesterol levels, or even life expectancy will have limited efficacy if broadly rejected by patients (whatever their reasons might be).

How do patients feel about taking blood pressure medications? What side effects do they experience? Do they skip doses because of the side effects?

PROMs, then, are an important supplement to POEMs. What patients experience will clearly influence their behaviors regarding, for example, adherence to a medication regimen or accepting recommended vaccinations. PROMs generally come in two broad forms.7,9 First are general types such as the SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) that measures health globally. Then there are condition-specific measures such as the DiabPROM (Diabetes Patient-Related Outcome Measures).10 More tools for measuring PROMs are being developed every year and are now available for a surprising range of clinical scenarios.

JABFM has a long history of publishing papers that take the patient’s perspective into account. The frequency has increased over time, and the editorial team hopes to publish much more research with associated PROMs going forward.8,11–14

Clinically, family physicians recognize the importance of taking the patient’s values and opinions into account before ordering tests or prescribing medications. Keeping patients at the center of clinical decisions is a pillar of family medicine. PROMs can keep patients at the center of family medicine research. Family medicine investigators are encouraged to consider the patient perspective as part of their research and, if their experience can be measured, include it as part of the larger project.

Conflicts of Interest

The author is the editor of the JABFM.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wong N. D.,
    2. Levy D.
    (3, 2013) Legacy of the Framingham Heart Study: rationale, design, initial findings, and implications. Glob Heart 8(1):3–9, doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2012.12.001, pmid:25690260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2012.12.001. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Smith R.,
    2. Rennie D.
    (1 22, 2014) Evidence-based medicine—an oral history. JAMA 311(4):365–367, doi:10.1001/jama.2013.286182, pmid:24449049, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.286182. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Djulbegovic B.,
    2. Guyatt G. H.
    (7 22, 2017) Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet 390(10092):415–423, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6, pmid:28215660, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Shaughnessy A. F.,
    2. Slawson D. C.
    (4 15, 1997) POEMs: patient-oriented evidence that matters. Ann Intern Med 126(8):667, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-8-199704150-00032, pmid:9103150, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-8-199704150-00032. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Slawson D. C.,
    2. Shaughnessy A. F.,
    3. Ebell M. H.,
    4. Barry H. C.
    (9, 1997) Mastering medical information and the role of POEMs—patient-oriented evidence that matters. J Fam Pract 45(3):195–196, pmid:9312554. .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Emanuel E. J.,
    2. Emanuel L. L.
    (4 22, 1992) Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 267(16):2221–2226, doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480160079038, pmid:1556799, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480160079038. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Churruca K.,
    2. Pomare C.,
    3. Ellis L. A..,
    4. et al.
    (8, 2021) Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect 24(4):1015–1024, doi:10.1111/hex.13254, pmid:33949755, pmcid:PMC8369118, https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13254. .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Solberg L. I.,
    2. Asche S. E.,
    3. Butler J..,
    4. et al.
    (11, 2015) The effect of achieving patient-reported outcome measures on satisfaction. J Am Board Fam Med 28(6):785–792, doi:10.3122/jabfm.2015.06.150079, pmid:26546655, https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.06.150079. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Wells G. A.,
    2. Russell A. S.,
    3. Haraoui B.,
    4. Bissonnette R.,
    5. Ware C. F.
    (11, 2011) Validity of quality of life measurement tools—from generic to disease-specific. J Rheumatol Suppl 88:2–6, doi:10.3899/jrheum.110906, pmid:22045972, https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110906. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Torbjørnsen A.,
    2. Jensen A. L.,
    3. Singstad T.,
    4. Weldingh N. M.,
    5. Holmen H.
    (11, 2023) Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 11(6):e003628, doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628, pmid:37963648, pmcid:PMC10649597, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Etz R. S.,
    2. Zyzanski S. J.,
    3. Gonzalez M. M.,
    4. Reves S. R.,
    5. O'Neal J. P.,
    6. Stange K. C.
    (2019) A new comprehensive measure of high-value aspects of primary care. Ann Fam Med 17:221–230, doi:10.1370/afm.2393, https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2393. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Khandalavala B.,
    2. Geske J.,
    3. Karloff M.
    (11, 2024) Patient-reported leg cramp treatments and their effectiveness. J Am Board Fam Med 37(6):1123–1129, doi:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230310R1, pmid:40118547, https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230310R1. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Mills G.,
    2. Leach W. T.,
    3. Hass R. W..,
    4. et al.
    (11 24, 2025) Implementation of the person-centered primary care measure. J Am Board Fam Med 38(4):706–715, doi:10.3122/jabfm.2024.240433R2, pmid:41115761, pmcid:PMC12978587, https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240433R2. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Littenberg B.,
    2. Bonnell L.,
    3. Callas P..,
    4. et al.
    (9, 2025) Degree of behavioral health integration and patient outcomes. J Am Board Fam Med 38(5):834–845, doi:10.3122/jabfm.2025.250052R1, pmid:41491563, pmcid:PMC12978598, https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2025.250052R1. .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 39 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 39, Issue 1
1 Jan 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
POEMs and PROMs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
POEMs and PROMs
Dean A. Seehusen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Aug 2026, 39 (1) 166265;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
POEMs and PROMs
Dean A. Seehusen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Aug 2026, 39 (1) 166265;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Power of Primary Care to Improve Health
  • The Clinical Model of Family Medicine: Debate and Dialogue About Our Future in Alexandria
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire