Abstract
Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) and the glucagon-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP1-RA are approved for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity given their profound impact on glycemic weight management. Additional indications include reducing cardiovascular disease risk and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in T2D as well as obstructive sleep apnea in patients with obesity. These enhanced effects are likely due to their pleiotropic effects, leading to decreased inflammation and other benefits. This review explored emerging evidence for uses of GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RA that have been researched but not yet approved. Clinicians may use this information to guide treatment decisions.
Review Process PubMed and Embase literature searches were conducted using Medical Subject Heading terms. Studies referencing GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RA were included if they were published in approximately the last decade, included adults, and were either a randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis, or observational study. Of 319 articles reviewed, 27 met inclusion criteria.
Emerging and Compelling Uses Initial positive impacts have been noted for the following conditions: liver disease/liver transplant, CKD/kidney transplant, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, substance use disorders, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, COVID-19 virus, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and short bowel syndrome.
Considerations Large randomized controlled trials may lead to approvals of these conditions and are encouraged. Safety and adverse effects of these medications must be assessed when initiating or modifying doses.
Conclusion GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RA have demonstrated early benefits to several conditions beyond their current approved indications. Clinicians can use this information to determine treatment options for patients, particularly in those with T2D, cardiovascular disease, and/or obesity.
- Alzheimer Disease
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
- Liver Diseases
- Off-Label Use
- Parkinson Disease
- Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- Respiratory Diseases
- Substance Use Disorders
- Chronic Disease
- Clinical Medicine
Background
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have emerged since the early 2000s as a promising treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In the United States (US), these currently approved medications include exenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide. GLP1-RAs are incretin hormones that work by mimicking the glucagon-like peptide-1 hormone, which stimulates insulin production and reduces glucagon release, while slowing gastric emptying and reducing food intake. A dual hormone agent, also known as “twincretin”, tirzepatide, has also been more recently developed, and incorporates GLP1-RA activity with a second incretin hormone, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). GIP increases the production of insulin as well as sensitivity to insulin.
Due to these multiple mechanisms of action and impact on weight loss, GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RA have also been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (Table 1). There have been additional indications for some agents based on benefits noted for patients with T2D and a history of cardiovascular events as well as to prevent chronic kidney disease. GLP1-RAs have demonstrated pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory properties and benefits beyond glycemic management. As such, multiple studies have begun to show the early positive impacts of these agents on non-approved uses of GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RA.
The aim of this review is to explore emerging and early evidence for use in disease states or comorbidities beyond T2D, cardiovascular disease, and obesity. Family medicine and internal medicine clinicians, in particular, may find this summary helpful as they consider treatment options for their patients. Highlighted areas in health care that are being explored include liver disease and liver transplant, kidney disease and kidney transplant, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, substance use disorders, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, COVID-19 virus, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and short bowel syndrome.
Review Process
A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies on GLP1-RAs and dual GIPGLP1-RA. The search encompassed articles published in approximately the last decade with the final search performed on March 18, 2025. The search strategy combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text keywords, including “GLP-1 receptor agonist” OR “glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist” OR “incretin mimetics,” specific drug names such as exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, albiglutide, lixisenatide, tirzepatide, and the disease states listed in the inclusion criteria below. Boolean operators (AND, OR) were utilized to refine the search results. Additionally, the reference lists of key articles were manually screened to identify studies not captured in the initial database search.
Studies were included based on the following criteria: adults (≥18 years) and use of any GLP1-RA or GIP/GLP1-RA medication. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and observational studies. Only articles published in English were considered. Additional inclusion criteria encompassed studies related to GIP/GLP1-RA (tirzepatide) and GLP1-RAs (all injectables and oral semaglutide), off-label use, liver-related outcomes, kidney-related outcomes, PCOS, neuropsychiatric conditions, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, eating disorders, substance use disorder, gastrointestinal conditions (e.g., Crohn’s disease, short bowel syndrome), and autoimmune conditions (e.g., osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis).
Studies were excluded if they focused solely on animal models or in vitro experiments, evaluated combination therapies without separate analysis of GLP1-RA effects, or were case reports, editorials, or non-peer-reviewed articles. Further exclusions included studies focusing on type 1 diabetes, pediatrics and adolescents, pregnancy, non-FDA-approved drugs, prescribing trends, animal studies, and shortages and insurance coverage. Reviewers screened the titles and abstracts for relevance, and full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved for detailed assessment. Extracted data included study design, sample size, intervention specifics, outcomes measured, and key findings.
Reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance. A full-text review was performed for studies meeting inclusion criteria. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus. Data were extracted into a standardized spreadsheet format that included study characteristics, intervention details, primary and secondary outcomes measured, and other key findings. The initial literature search yielded 319 articles (167 from Embase and 152 from PubMed), 110 of which were included that met the above criteria. An additional 83 were excluded using the established criteria. The final review included 27 articles that met inclusion criteria.
Emerging and Compelling Uses of GLP1-RAs and Dual GIP/GLP1-RA
Table 2 details the findings of the review on emerging and compelling uses of GLP1-RAs and dual GIP/GLP-RA.
Liver Disease and Liver Transplant
Recently, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases introduced new nomenclature for describing liver disease. Previously known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcohol steatohepatitis (NASH), it is now known as metabolic dysfunction–associated liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH). While GLP-1RAs have not yet received FDA indication for MASLD or MASH, they have shown promise in treating MASLD/MASH and improving liver histology, decreasing hepatic steatosis, and reducing fibrosis progression in patients with metabolic liver disease.27 The American Diabetes Association has even added considerations for liver health as part of their guidelines and pharmacologic management.28 The proposed mechanisms occur via weight loss by reducing hepatic fat accumulation by promoting appetite suppression and caloric intake reduction, insulin sensitization by enhancing glucose metabolism, reducing hepatic de novo lipogenesis, hepatic fat reduction by decreasing triglyceride synthesis and promotes lipid oxidation, and anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) and oxidative stress, slowing fibrosis progression.29
In a nested case control study (n = 5730), there was a non-significant trend to favor GLP1-RAs in preventing new cases of MASLD/MASH in patients with T2D (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.84 [95% CI: 0.46-1.52]).1 The study also showed a dose-dependent reduction in liver enzyme biomarkers, such as alanine transferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). GLP1-RAs may be useful in patients with T2D, especially those with obesity, at the maximum tolerated dose (e.g., for gastrointestinal side effects) as a preventive strategy against MASLD/MASH.
In a retrospective cohort study of patients with T2D and MASLD (n=53,249), GLP1-RAs were associated with similar reductions in cardiovascular events, including heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.96), major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.08), cerebrovascular events (HR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.95), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.56) as SGLT-2 inhibitors.2 While not demonstrating an impact in MASLD progression, this study provided important data for the long-term complications of both T2D and MASLD.
Regarding the safety of GLP1-RAs in patients with a history of liver transplant, a retrospective review looked at efficacy and safety of GLP1-RAs for weight loss in patients without diabetes. Compared to placebo, the patients receiving GLP1-RAs saw significantly more weight loss (7.87% vs 4.24%) while maintaining a similar side effect profile.3 Another retrospective analysis looking at patients (n=338) with a history of liver transplant and T2D demonstrated that over an eight-year study period, the risk of MACE/peripheral vascular disease and all-cause mortality were significantly lower in GLP1-RAs users (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.96).4
Notably, GLP1-RAs are not well studied in decompensated cirrhosis, but studies have shown the benefit of GLP1-RAs in liver transplant recipients without major safety concerns. While showing promise, additional studies are needed to confirm histologic improvement and fibrosis regression.
Kidney Disease and Transplantation
There is growing use and study of GLP1-RAs in acute and chronic kidney disease as well as kidney transplant. Most recently, injectable semaglutide received FDA approval to reduce the risk of worsening kidney disease in adults with T2D and chronic kidney disease (CKD). T2D that is not well managed can accelerate the decline in kidney function and GLP1-RAs have demonstrated protection in patients with T2D and CKD.30 A large longitudinal study (GLP1-RA users; n = 7,511) evaluated the impact of both short- and long-acting GLP1-RAs on MACE and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) in patients with acute kidney disease.8 GLP1-RA users had reduced risk of both MACE and MAKE with aHR of 0.88 and 0.73, respectively. While a lower risk of MAKE was found, it was less pronounced in patients with proteinuria and with short-acting GLP1-RA (daily exenatide and lixisenatide) use. A three-year large retrospective cohort study in 29,146 propensity score matched veterans with CKD compared kidney endpoints in patients with T2D and use of GLP1-RA or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SLGT2i).5 GLP1-RAs used were liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide, although impact of individual drugs was not studied. The GLP1-RA group noted a decreased composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease event and ≥40% decline event in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In a retrospective cross-sectional propensity score matching study (n= 250), dulaglutide was evaluated in patients with T2D and moderate to severe CKD.6 The primary outcome was the measurement of the eGFR slope. Over the three-year period, dulaglutide demonstrated renoprotection by slowing the eGFR decline. Mean (95% CI) in eGFR slope was 0.11 (−0.34, 0.56) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year in the dulaglutide group (n = 120) and − 1.29 (−1.64, −0.94) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year in the non-dulaglutide group (n = 130). The impact was more profound in patients with concomitant macro-albuminuria and/or SGLT2i use. In a review of RTCs and observational studies evaluating the use of GLP1-RAs in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (on dialysis) and kidney transplantation, GLP1-RAs were found to be effective and safe.7 The most reported adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature in both groups; however, hypoglycemia was prevalent in ESKD users especially with concomitant insulin use but were not present in kidney transplant studies.
Neurodegenerative Disorders: Parkinson’s Disease
Following FDA approval of GLP1-RAs in the early 2000’s, observations were made that patients with neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), who concomitantly were treated with a GLP1-RA for T2D or obesity demonstrated improvement in neurodegenerative symptoms. Since GLP1-RAs cross the blood brain barrier and the brain contains GLP1-RA receptors, studies have been conducted to determine if neuroprotective properties exist. Several complementary mechanisms have been identified at the cellular level improving neural-inflammation; increased efficiency of ATP production, reduced oxidative stress, improved synaptic activity and neuronal survival, as well as an association between metabolism and insulin sensitivity.9,31,32
PD is a progressive multifactorial neurodegenerative condition with clinical characteristics including tremors at rest, gait dysfunction, speech difficulty, cognitive impairment, and dementia. While dopamine replacement has served as the hallmark treatment, more focus has been on slowing the disease progression rather than restoring dopamine levels. In a small open label study examining exenatide 10 mcg twice daily use for 12 months in patients with PD, both motor and non-motor improvements were found.33 Motor severity was measured using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). In a follow-up study evaluating subjects (20 in the study group versus 24 in the control group) 12 months post-discontinuation of exenatide, MDS-UPDRS improvements continued and were sustained despite no exposure to exenatide for one year.10 A large-scale retrospective propensity-matched cohort study involving 17 countries and 127 healthcare organizations evaluated real-world use of semaglutide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide in over 102,000 obese patients with neurodegenerative disorders, including PD, AD, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia.9 The primary aim was to investigate the association between the use of GLP1-RAs and the risk of developing neurodegenerative disorders in obese patients. In the PD cohort, semaglutide was the only GLP1-RA associated with a significant neurodegenerative risk reduction compared to the control group (relative risk [RR]=0.574, 95% CI=0.369-0.893 versus (RR=0.784, 95% CI=0.580-1.058); while dulaglutide and liraglutide did not demonstrate any risk reduction. In the full cohort, including all four neurodegenerative disorders, semaglutide and dulaglutide demonstrated significant reduction in fatality rates compared to non-GLP1-RA users.
Neurodegenerative Disorders: AD
AD, the most common type of dementia, is a slow progressive brain disorder with clinical characteristics of memory loss, confusion, difficulty finding words, completing tasks and exerting fine motor skills. Like PD, there has been an increased interest in repurposing GLP1-RAs to assess the impact on clinical improvement in AD, with many preclinical studies and trials now published.34 In the previously discussed large-scale retrospective propensity-matched study, semaglutide was also the only GLP1-RA that significantly improved neurodegenerative risk of AD.9 While dulaglutide showed a similar trend, it did not reach significance and liraglutide showed no significant difference. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparisons were made of five small randomized clinical trials from 2012-2019 in patients (n=177) with diagnosed AD or cognitive impairment without an AD diagnosis.11 The primary aim of evaluating change in cognitive function was assessed using at least one of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), or Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) tools in patients exposed to exenatide or liraglutide versus placebo. Use of GLP1-RAs was associated with improved cognitive function in patients with AD (Mean Difference = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.45-2.88). These findings may help inform clinical use of GLP1-RAs in AD; however, additional larger scale clinical studies would be useful to identify optimal drugs, dosing, and treatment duration.
Substance Use Disorders
GLP1-RAs have gained some attention for their use in substance use disorders. GLP-1 receptors in the brain’s mesolimbic system are responsible for regulating motivated behaviors and reward processing through a dopamine response, which plays a key role in food satiety and appetite control. This region of the brain overlaps with pathways involved in addiction and substance use disorders. Due to similarities in the reward mechanism, it is thought that GLP1-RAs may influence substance satiety and alter the reward related responses and change substance use behaviors.14
One cohort study of patients (n=33,006) with T2D and opioid use disorder treated with a GLP1-RA compared to other diabetes medications showed that semaglutide was associated with a significantly lower risk of opioid overdose (range from HR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.12-0.89 to HR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38-0.87) during a 1-year follow-up compared with other diabetes medications, including other GLP1-RAs.13
In another cohort study, patients (n=503,747) with a history of opioid or alcohol use disorder (AUD) treated with GLP1-RAs had a 40% lower rate of incident opioid overdose and a 50% lower rate of incident alcohol intoxication compared to those without a GLP1-RA prescription (adjusted incidence rate ration; 95% CI=0.60 [0.43-0.83]).12 Another review article in patients with alcohol use disorder found a significant reduction in the number of heavy drinking days and total alcohol intake.35
In a recent phase 2 clinical trial that evaluated the effects of semaglutide in non–treatment-seeking adults with AUD, semaglutide was associated with a decrease in overall alcohol intake per drink and a decrease in cravings. However, there was no difference in overall drinking days versus abstinence days.15 One factor slowing research in AUD is that patients with AUD are already at a higher risk for developing pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer, both of which are known precautions for the use of GLP-1 RAs.36
Inflammation: Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Psoriasis
Given the propensity for weight loss, GLP1-RAs may be suitable treatment options for diseases that are caused by or worsened by obesity and its pro-inflammatory impact. As such, literature demonstrates the expanding role of GLP1-RAs in obesity and inflammatory conditions, particularly osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and psoriasis. In a double-blinded RCT that included 407 participants with obesity and knee OA, 271 received once weekly semaglutide escalated to maximum of 2.4 mg target and 136 received placebo.17 Semaglutide users noted significantly decreased pain and improved weight loss (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain score decreased by 41.7 points with semaglutide versus 27.5 points with placebo, p<0.001). Another study found a reduced risk of OA in a retrospective cohort study (n=39,394 patients with obesity) assessing diagnosis and prescription claims for tirzepatide, semaglutide, or liraglutide.18 Specifically, adjusted OA risk was significantly decreased (27%) in patients using a GLP1-RA than in non-users (HR=0.73, p=0.0019), with tirzepatide demonstrating lowest risk of the three GLP1-RAs studied (HR=0.57 versus semaglutide, p<0.0001; liraglutide HR 1.63 versus tirzepatide, p=0.0007). Finally, a scoping review of GLP1-RAs across eight studies in patients with RA and psoriasis demonstrated similar positive impacts.19 The review found that patients with RA or psoriatic arthritis who used liraglutide had reduced disease activity noted via assessment of Disease Activity Score (DAS-28). Additionally, four of five clinical studies of patients with psoriasis who used liraglutide or exenatide had significant improvements in Psoriasis Area Severity Index and weight/body mass index.
Inflammation: COVID-19 Virus
The anti-inflammatory properties seen in GLP1-RAs could theoretically decrease the exaggerated response caused by the COVID-19 virus.37 One systematic review of 32,853 patients with at least two prescriptions of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, GLP1-RAs, SGLT2-is, or any other antihyperglycemic drug analyzed these medications’ effects on COVID-19 prognosis.20 Authors demonstrated a reduction in risk of COVID-19 outcomes for patients who had used DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1RAs, and SGLT2-is versus nonusers, although findings were only significant for DPP-4 inhibitor users for total mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.82-0.97) as well as for reduction in hospital admissions in GLP1-RA users (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.94) and in-hospital mortality in SGLT2-i users (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.96).20 It was proposed that this positive impact could be due to GLP1-RA reduction of cytokine-induced lung injury through interference with the NF-KB pathway or via anti-inflammatory effects.20,38,39 Further, a meta-analysis of 18 studies assessed the mortality risk of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes treated with anti-diabetes medications.21 GLP1-RA treatment was associated with reduced mortality risk (OR 0.91, p=0.02) compared to non-use and had the most significant protective effect against death, followed by SGLT2-is and metformin.
Inflammation: Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Literature has further outlined that the anti-inflammatory effects previously described have also been noted in respiratory diseases including asthma and COPD. A recent meta-analysis that included 39 RCTs of 85,755 patients with T2D or patients with obesity assessed the effects of GLP1-RAs (lixisenatide, exenatide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and albiglutide) and dual GLP-1RA/GIP (tirzepatide) on asthma.23 Investigators noted a trend of reduced asthma risk in patients who used a GLP1-RA, though statistical significance was not achieved (relative risk [RR]=0.91, 95% CI 0.68-1.24). Further studies are warranted to further elucidate the impact on asthma.
Respiratory outcomes in COPD patients have been favorable among those who used GLP1-RAs. The impact of GLP1-RAs on airway inflammation includes decreased airway hyperreactivity, mucous metaplasia, and lung IL-33 expression, all of which are associated with COPD.24,40–44 A retrospective, observational study of electronic health records (n=1,642 patients) found that unadjusted COPD exacerbation counts were significantly higher in patients with T2D who used DPP-4 inhibitors (incidence rate ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.08-2.04, p=0.02) and sulfonylureas (incidence rate ratio 2.09, 95% CI 1.62-2.69, p<0.0001) compared to those who used GLP1-RAs, including albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, and lixisenatide.24 Further, a nationwide cohort study of 8,060 patients with COPD and T2D found that GLP1-RA users had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.38-0.56), MACE (including composite of hospitalization for stroke, coronary artery disease, and heart failure) (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93), invasive mechanical ventilation (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.8), and bacterial pneumonia (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88) than non-GLP1-RA users.22 These findings may help inform treatment decisions for patients with comorbid inflammatory respiratory disorders and T2D.
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
Insulin resistance, obesity and abdominal obesity, metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular risk factors are associated with PCOS.25,45 Given the propensity to improve insulin resistance and weight loss, GLP1-RAs are a promising treatment to consider for overweight or obese patients with PCOS. A systematic review of eight randomized controlled trials found that GLP1-RAs (liraglutide or exenatide) were more effective at improving insulin sensitive and reducing body mass index and waist circumference than metformin or dapagliflozin in adults with PCOS.25 Another review also assessed eight studies of adult patients with PCOS and found that GPL1-RAs (liraglutide or exenatide) effectively reduced body weight and improved some endocrine parameters (reduced total testosterone and improved sex hormone binding globulin levels) and insulin resistance.26 The most compelling treatment for this population included a combination of GLP1-RA and metformin, which improved menstrual cyclicity, insulin sensitivity, glucose metabolism, and anthropometric measures.
Gastrointestinal
One pilot observational study found that adult patients (n=19) with newly diagnosed short bowel syndrome after surgical resection benefited from a GLP1-RA.16 Deficiencies in GLP-1, as well as GLP-2, are noted in short bowel syndrome.46 In the pilot study, liraglutide was titrated from doses varying 0.6 mg/day to 1.8 mg/day.16 After six months of treatment, the median ostomy/fecal output decreased significantly by 550 mL/day in patients treated with a GLP1-RA (versus reduction of 200 mL/day in untreated patients, p=0.04). Given this paucity of literature, further studies will add to the growing evidence for use in short bowel syndrome.
Summary and Considerations
GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RAs show early and compelling evidence in the previously described studies for several conditions beyond those currently approved for use by the FDA. Future studies, ideally RCTs, conducted on larger cohorts may lead to approvals of these conditions and should be encouraged. Additionally, the emerging data on these agents can help inform primary care clinicians, including physicians, physician associates, nurse practitioners, and clinical pharmacists, in selecting treatment and providing education for patients with T2D who present with comorbidities highlighted in this review. The American Diabetes Association advocates for interdisciplinary care in treating patients with diabetes as displayed in Table 1.28
In studies and clinical practice, the most common adverse event associated with GLP1-RA and dual GIP/GLP1-RA is gastrointestinal discomfort, which can present as mild to severe. Proper patient education can improve tolerability. For example, to prevent nausea, vomiting, and heartburn, eating smaller meals (i.e., the size of a fistful) more often, avoiding irritating foods and drinks (i.e., spicy, fatty, or greasy foods or carbonated beverages), and avoid lying down or going to bed 2-3 hours after eating. For patients using these drugs for obesity, monitoring blood pressure is essential. Weight loss often results in improved blood pressure and dyslipidemia resulting in the need for reassessment of hypertension and dyslipidemia medications. Another important consideration with GLP1-RA and GIP/GLP1-RA use is holding the medication prior to surgery or other medical procedures (i.e., colonoscopy, endoscopy). These drugs delay gastric emptying and may predispose patients to lung aspiration. Generally, short-acting GLP-1 RAs should be held the day of surgery/procedure and once-weekly GLP-1 RAs should be held one week prior.
Specific limitations are inherent in any literature review. Reported outcomes could be skewed since studies with positive outcomes may be more likely published than those without, creating an inadvertent publication and/or selection bias. Both positive and negative outcomes were provided in this review. A time lag bias may also occur to due to additional studies published during this manuscripts review process, which we attempted to mitigate by including the most up to date data at the time of submission. Since all authors are clinical pharmacist practitioners working in collaborative practices with patients with diabetes, there could also be a discipline bias.
Conclusion
This review provided evidence that GLP1-RAs and GIP/GLP1-RAs have demonstrated early benefits to several conditions beyond their current FDA approved indications. Primary care clinicians can use this information to determine treatment options for patients, particularly in those with T2D, cardiovascular disease, and/or obesity.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interests.
Corresponding Author
Candis M. Morello, PharmD, University of California San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla, CA, cmmorello{at}health.ucsd.edu
Peer Review
This manuscript was externally peer reviewed.
- Received for publication April 24, 2025.
- Accepted for publication September 8, 2025.






