Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Article CommentaryCommentary

An Academic Family Physician’s Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Experience

William Hui
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2025, 38 (6) 949-954; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240379R1
William Hui
From the Stanford University School of Medicine (WH).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In family medicine (FM), point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) usage is rising. Clinically, acute outpatient concerns often lends itself to more opportunities to use POCUS. Common scans utilized in the acute, outpatient setting include soft tissue masses, foreign body assessments, preprocedural guidance for incision and drainage and soft tissue mass excisions, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) ultrasound (US), joint effusions, right upper quadrant (RUQ) US assessments to check for gallstones, lung US for respiratory infections (especially in children), shoulder rotator cuff assessments, bladder US, and US assisted/guided procedures such as Baker’s cyst aspirations, Carpal tunnel injections, and DeQuervain tenosynovitis injections. The goal of this commentary is to share clinical scenarios that can be helpful to use POCUS in the outpatient setting. With the advent of handheld US, recent Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education FM updates to recommend residents to learn POCUS3, and nationwide efforts spreading POCUS into residencies and primary care departments; I am optimistic that this will inspire and empower primary care physicians to learn and use POCUS effectively to benefit patients where and when they need care the most.

  • Family Medicine
  • Medical Education
  • POCUS
  • Point-of-Care Systems
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Primary Health Care
  • Technology
  • Ultrasonography

Introduction

In family medicine (FM), point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) usage is rising. As of 2022, 81% of FM departments have at least one POCUS-trained faculty member.1 Although there is high interest and perceived importance of using POCUS, there are low comfort levels in performing POCUS.2 This can be due to variety of reasons, including lack of trained providers, ultrasound equipment, and funding for training.3 To address the barriers of education, there are emerging educational programs, such as STFM's FM POCUS educator's certificate course.4

Clinically, appropriate opportunities to use POCUS are more common during acute outpatient concerns than annual or preventive visits. POCUS can be used to identify soft tissue masses, aid in preprocedural planning, check for joint effusions, guide Baker’s cyst drainage, and more.

The goal of this commentary is to share clinical scenarios that can be helpful to use POCUS in the outpatient setting. To my knowledge, 1 other commentary has been written by 2 internal medicine primary care physicians.1

Clinical Utilization of POCUS

Here are selected clinical case scenarios in the outpatient setting that illustrate the transformative impact of POCUS on patient care:

Soft Tissue

  • Identification of a Soft Tissue Mass: A male patient presents with a left posterior back mass for 1 year. The soft, rubbery mass is estimated to be 4 cm in diameter, likely lipoma. Despite the examination and explanation of findings, the patient is adamant to pursue imaging and removal. POCUS allowed for accurate, quick, non-ionizing confirmation of the size and identification of a soft tissue mass. In addition, this can aid in pre-procedural planning prior to soft tissue mass removal. Based on the large size of 6 cm confirmed by POCUS, the patient was preferentially referred to dermatology, rather than in-office removal. Research in primary care has shown notable differences in size estimation between physical exams and POCUS, impacting medical decision-making2 (Figure 1).

  • Reassurance and Patient Education: In an abdominal wall abscess case, POCUS allowed the clinician to communicate findings clearly and allow the patient to visualize the pathology, showing a highly anxious patient the exact location of the cavity. POCUS is 94.6% sensitive, and 85.4% specific for identifying abscesses.5 Over subsequent visits, the clinician demonstrated how the cavity was shrinking. This immediate feedback was invaluable and not easily achievable with traditional radiology, improving patient education and safety by serving as evidence to avoid unnecessary repeat procedures. There is evidence that POCUS is well received by patients, providing reassurance and improved patient understanding and patient satisfaction6,7 (Figure 2).

  • Foreign Body: For a patient accidentally stepping on glass, POCUS revealed evidence of a foreign body, and guided removal. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for foreign body identification were 72% and 92% respectively8 (Figure 3).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Lipoma. The linear internal reflectors within a well circumscribed, oval shaped isoechoic mass is suggestive of a lipoma.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Abscess. Irregularly bordered hypoechoic to anechoic mass with internal isoechoic contents.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

Foreign body. A small hyperechoic foreign body is seen in the superficial soft tissue, highlighted by a hypoechoic halo sign surrounding it.

Musculoskeletal

  • Joint Effusions: POCUS helped assess joint effusions in patients with equivocal physical exams. By checking for joint effusions before performing arthrocentesis, unnecessary procedures have been avoided (Figure 4).

  • Posterior Knee Pain: An elderly patient presented with painful posterior left knee symptoms had a suspected Baker’s cyst. POCUS guided the needle to the cyst without risking injury to the popliteal vasculature and simultaneously ruled out a popliteal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Figure 5).

  • Carpal Tunnel: For a patient with pain and numbness in the median nerve distribution, POCUS was beneficial to visualize and measure the median nerve, accurately directed the injectate to the proper location hydro-dissecting the nerve, resulting in effective pain relief (Figure 6).

  • Achilles Tear: An elderly male playing pickleball experienced an audible pop and swelling in the posterior ankle. POCUS showed a full thickness Achilles tear, expediting workup with orthopedics for follow up (Figure 7).

  • Achilles Pain and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Deferral: Another patient expressed concern about their Achilles pain and requested an MRI. While the exam noted tenderness at the distal Achilles insertion, Thompson test was negative. Utilizing POCUS, the patient was reassured that the Achilles fibers were intact, suggesting tendinopathy rather than a tear. The patient left feeling assured and ready for physical therapy without an MRI (Figure 8).

  • Full-Thickness Muscle Tear: A patient presented after an Emergency Department (ED) evaluation for a traumatic left medial knee pain following a motorcycle accident. An X-ray was negative, but due to medial knee swelling and warmth, the provider suspected an abscess or hematoma. A bedside Ultrasound (US) revealed a near-complete medial vastus medialis tear, confirmed by MRI, leading to a more accurate treatment plan (Figure 9).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.

Knee effusion. There is a hypoechoic stripe in the middle, depicting a small to moderate knee effusion seen in the suprapatellar bursa between the patella (superficial hyperechoic bone on left) and femur (deep hyperechoic bone on right).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5.

Baker’s cyst. A hypoechoic balloon-like mass seen in the posterior medial knee, in between the semimembranosus and medial gastrocnemius muscles.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6.

Median nerve. With a linear probe in transverse position, an anechoic oval structure with honeycomb appearance is seen highlighted, at the distal transverse carpal crease of the wrist.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7.

Achilles tendon near-complete tear. Achilles tendon visualized in longitudinal axis with anechoic near-complete tear seen in the middle, with both stumps visualized to the left and right of the anechoic area.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 8.

Achilles tendinopathy. Achilles tendon seen in longitudinal axis. There is an area of Achilles hypertrophy or thickening seen to the right of the screen, as well as diffuse heterogeneity with hypoechoic areas, suggestive of tendinopathy.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 9.

Muscle tear. There is an anechoic area indicating a full thickness tear, with retractions of the muscle seen to the left and right of the screen.

DVT

  • Positive DVT: A male with a history of DVT presented with left calf pain and discoloration after recent international travel. POCUS enabled rapid treatment with initiation of Eliquis by the end of the appointment. Another case involved a male with history of cancer, initially suspected to have a calf strain but identified on POCUS to have extensive femoral and popliteal DVT, who had prompt initiation of anticoagulation treatment all in the same office visit.

  • Negative DVT: Numerous DVT rule-outs were conducted for low-risk patients per Wells Criteria, effectively eliminating the need for ED referrals, particularly before weekends when outpatient radiology services are unavailable. POCUS sensitivity and specificity with DVT diagnosis is 88% and 95% overall.9 In primary care, DVT POCUS has the potential to significantly change clinical management and curtail low-risk DVT related ED visits.

Lung

  • Ruling Out Pneumonia: During winter, pediatric patients frequently present with upper respiratory infection (URI) symptoms lasting 3-4 weeks. Utilizing lung US, patients and parents were reassured that no significant pneumonia was visible, deferring the need for a chest X-ray and avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure in a low-risk scenario. For diagnosing pneumonia in children, the sensitivity was 96% and specificity 93%.10

Abdomen

  • POCUS as a Complement to Physical Exam: An elderly female with abdominal pain and fever exhibited rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant, raising suspicion for appendicitis or diverticulitis. The specificity for diagnosing appendicitis is 97%,11 and diagnosing diverticulitis is 90%.12 POCUS increased the diagnostic confidence, revealing signs of colon inflammation, eventually leading to a Computed tomography (CT) confirming complicated cecal diverticulitis and hospitalization for IV antibiotics. (Figure 10).

  • Ruling in Urinary Retention: An elderly gentleman presented with lower urinary tract symptoms and inability to void. POCUS revealed over one liter of post-void residual urine, prompting appropriate referral for foley placement and urology consultation.

  • Ruling in Gallstones: A middle-aged female with suspected biliary colic needed a US but faced scheduling delays. POCUS for gallstones have shown high sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 93%, respectively.13 For detection of cholecystitis, sensitivity and specificity was 73% and 93%, respectively.13 Within moments of scanning, POCUS identified a large gallstone in the gallbladder neck, allowing the clinician to promptly counsel the patient on elective cholecystectomy and an expedited surgical referral (Figure 11).

  • Ruling in Hernia: An elderly female was evaluated in the ED for colicky right lower quadrant abdominal pain. A CT abdomen did not show any acute findings. On follow up, due to her colicky pain, POCUS revealed a fat-containing partially reducible inguinal hernia, suspecting this is a possible reason for her discomfort. This was not seen or commented on the CT report. Ultrasound can diagnosis inguinal hernias with a sensitivity of 86%, and a specificity of 77%,14 and has a role in stratifying clinically evolving hernias.15 A radiology ultrasound confirmed these findings. She was scheduled for an elective hernia repair (Figure 12).

Figure 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 10.

Abdominal inflammation. In the area of concern in the right lower quadrant, there was an area of bowel seen with an anechoic ring of fluid surrounding it, suggestive of inflammation, correlating to the physical examination of rebound tenderness and significant pain out of proportion to examination. On confirmatory Computed Tomography (CT), this was found to be a complicated cecal diverticulitis.

Figure 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 11.

Gallstone. There is a rounded hyperechoic mass with posterior acoustic shadowing seen, suggestive of a gallstone near the gallbladder neck. In addition, there is also isoechoic sludge seen within the gallbladder.

Figure 12.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 12.

Hernia. A hernia is seen protruding through the peritoneal defect, made more prominent with a valsava maneuver.

Obstetrics/Gynecology (OBGYN)

  • Ruling in Intrauterine Pregnancy: For a patient with a positive pregnancy test and missed menstrual period, POCUS provided an immediate diagnosis allowing for immediate counseling for next steps. Specificity is 92-100% confirming an intrauterine pregnancy when gestational sac and yolk sac or fetal pole are seen.16

  • Ectopic Pregnancy: A female patient followed up in primary care after leaving the emergency room against medical advice for vaginal bleeding. A positive urine pregnancy test prompted a POCUS which showed a gestational sac with fetal heart tones seen outside the uterus, which suggested an ectopic pregnancy. This expedited a referral to emergency and OBGYN specialists for an urgent left salpingectomy.

Cardiac

  • Pericardial Effusion: In a challenging case of a pericardial effusion of unclear etiology, POCUS allowed the clinician to assess whether the effusion was worsening throughout multiple return clinic visits. Diagnosing pericardial effusions have a sensitivity of 96%, and a specificity of 98%.17 This occurred while coordinating care with specialists, including cardiologists and rheumatologists. This approach reduced patient anxiety without requiring repeated radiation. The patient was eventually diagnosed with lupus. (Figure 13).

Figure 13.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 13.

Pericardial effusion. In this subcostal view of the heart, there is an anechoic effusion circumferentially surrounding the pericardium.

Summary

These clinical scenarios highlight ways in which POCUS can be utilized in the outpatient clinic, with some cases significantly changing the management.

With the advent of handheld US, recent Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education FM updates to recommend residents to learn POCUS3, and nationwide efforts spreading POCUS into residencies and primary care departments; I am optimistic that this will inspire and empower primary care physicians to learn and use POCUS effectively to benefit patients where and when they need care the most.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • Received for publication October 17, 2024.
  • Revision received December 13, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication January 6, 2025.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Capizzano JN,
    2. O'Dwyer M-C,
    3. Furst W,
    4. et al
    . Current state of point-of-care ultrasound use within family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:809–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ludden-Schlatter A,
    2. Kruse RL,
    3. Mahan R,
    4. Stephens L
    . Point-of-care ultrasound attitudes, barriers, and current use among family medicine residents and practicing physicians. PRiMER 2023;7:13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nathanson R,
    2. Williams JP,
    3. Gupta N,
    4. et al
    . Current use and barriers to point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a national survey of VA medical centers. Am J Med 2023;136:592–5.e2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tanner C
    , STFM. STFM announces a new family medicine pocus educator’s certificate program. Ann Fam Med 2023;21:381–2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gottlieb M,
    2. Avila J,
    3. Chottiner M,
    4. Peksa GD
    . Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of skin and soft tissue abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2020;76:67–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Balmuth EA,
    2. Luan D,
    3. Jannat-Khah D,
    4. Evans A,
    5. Wong T,
    6. Scales DA
    . Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): assessing patient satisfaction and socioemotional benefits in the hospital setting. PLoS One 2024;19:e0298665.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Andersen CA,
    2. Brodersen J,
    3. Rudbæk TR,
    4. Jensen MB
    . Patients’ experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 2021;22:116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Davis J,
    2. Czerniski B,
    3. Au A,
    4. Adhikari S,
    5. Farrell I,
    6. Fields JM
    . Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in retained soft tissue foreign bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:777–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Popat A,
    2. Harikrishnan S,
    3. Seby N,
    4. et al
    . Utilization of point-of-care ultrasound as an imaging modality in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus 2024;16(1):e52371. Published 2024 Jan 16.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pereda MA,
    2. Chavez MA,
    3. Hooper-Miele CC,
    4. et al
    . Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015;135:714–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Matthew Fields J,
    2. Davis J,
    3. Alsup C,
    4. et al
    . Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2017;24:1124–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nazerian P,
    2. Gigli C,
    3. Donnarumma E,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound integrated into clinical examination for acute diverticulitis: a prospective multicenter study. Ultraschall Med 2021;42:614–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Li K,
    3. Kou S,
    4. Wu X,
    5. Zhang Z
    . The accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in the detection of gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 2024;31:1336–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Robinson A,
    2. Light D,
    3. Kasim A,
    4. Nice C
    . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of radiology in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 2013;27:11–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Al Jalbout N,
    2. Liteplo A,
    3. Shokoohi H
    . Point-of care ultrasound in stratifying clinically evolving inguinal and femoral hernias. J Emerg Med 2022;63:257–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. McRae A,
    2. Murray H,
    3. Edmonds M
    . Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of emergency department targeted ultrasonography in the evaluation of first-trimester pelvic pain and bleeding: a systematic review. CJEM 2009;11:355–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mandavia DP,
    2. Hoffner RJ,
    3. Mahaney K,
    4. Henderson SO
    . Bedside echocardiography by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:377–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family   Medicine: 38 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 6
November-December 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Academic Family Physician’s Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Experience
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
An Academic Family Physician’s Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Experience
William Hui
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2025, 38 (6) 949-954; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240379R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Academic Family Physician’s Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Experience
William Hui
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2025, 38 (6) 949-954; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240379R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Clinical Utilization of POCUS
    • Summary
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Medicine Residency Match Is Not a “Field of Dreams”
  • The Differing Career Choice Paths of MD and DO Family Medicine Residents: A Call to Action
  • Do No Harm? Rethinking Urine Drug Screens in Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Family Medicine
  • Medical Education
  • POCUS
  • Point-of-Care Systems
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Primary Health Care
  • Technology
  • Ultrasonography

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire