Shared Decision Making in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Siegel RL,
   2. Wagle NS,
   3. Cercek A,
   4. Smith RA,
   5. Jemal A

   . Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023;73:233–54.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   Recommendation: Colorectal Cancer: Screening. United States Preventive Services Taskforce (Available at: uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org).
3. 3.↵
   1. Lee B,
   2. Lin K,
   3. Liang PS

   . Effectiveness and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022;32:215–26.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Elwyn G,
   2. Frosch D,
   3. Thomson R,
   4. et al

   . Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Schrager S,
   2. Phillips G,
   3. Burnside E

   . Shared decision making in cancer screening. Fam Pract Manag 2017;24:5–10.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Cossu G,
   2. Saba L,
   3. Minerba L,
   4. Massalchi M

   . Colorectal cancer screening: the role of psychological, social and background factors in decision-making process. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2018;14:63–9.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Lau J,
   2. Lim TZ,
   3. Jianlin Wong G,
   4. Tan KK

   . The health belief model and colorectal cancer screening in the general population: a systematic review. Prev Med Rep 2020;20:101223.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Volk RJ,
   2. Leal VB,
   3. Jacobs LE,
   4. et al

   . From guideline to practice: new shared decision-making tools for colorectal cancer screening from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:246–9.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Munn Z,
   2. Peters MDJ,
   3. Stern C,
   4. Tufanaru C,
   5. McArthur A,
   6. Aromataris E

   . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:143.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Christy SM,
    2. Rawl SM

    . Shared decision making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research. Patient Educ Couns 2013;91:310–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Peters MDJ,
    2. Marnie C,
    3. Tricco AC,
    4. et al

    . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement 2021;19:3–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Tricco AC,
    2. Lillie E,
    3. Zarin W,
    4. et al

    . PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bramer WM,
    2. Giustini D,
    3. de Jonge GB,
    4. Holland L,
    5. Bekhuis T

    . De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc 2016;104:240–3. Erratum in: J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):111.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Brenner A,
    2. Howard K,
    3. Lewis C,
    4. et al

    . Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29:507–13.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.
    1. Dolan JG,
    2. Boohaker E,
    3. Allison J,
    4. Imperiale TF

    . Patients' preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening. Med Decis Making 2013;33:59–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Dyer KE,
    2. Shires DA,
    3. Flocke SA,
    4. et al

    . Patient-reported needs following a referral for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2019;56:271–80.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 17.
    1. Flocke SA,
    2. Stange KC,
    3. Cooper GS,
    4. et al

    . Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:2168–73.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.
    1. Hawley S,
    2. Lillie S,
    3. Cooper G,
    4. Elston Lafata J

    . Managed care patients' preferences, physician recommendations, and colon cancer screening. Am J Manag Care 2014;20:555–61.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.
    1. Heidenreich S,
    2. Finney Rutten LJ,
    3. Miller-Wilson LA,
    4. Jimenez-Moreno C,
    5. Chua GN,
    6. Fisher DA

    . Colorectal cancer screening preferences among physicians and individuals at average risk: a discrete choice experiment. Cancer Med 2022;11:3156–67.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Hennelly MO,
    2. Sly JR,
    3. Villagra C,
    4. Jandorf L

    . Narrative message targets within the decision-making process to undergo screening colonoscopy among Latinos: a qualitative study. J Cancer Educ 2015;30:268–76.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Elmore JG,
    3. Fairfield KM,
    4. Gerstein BS,
    5. Levin CA,
    6. Pignone MP

    . Lack of shared decision making in cancer screening discussions: results from a national survey. Am J Prev Med 2014;47:251–9. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Elmore JG,
    3. Pignone MP,
    4. Gerstein BS,
    5. Levin CA,
    6. Fairfield KM

    . Knowledge and values for cancer screening decisions: results from a national survey. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:624–30.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Lewis CL,
    3. Pignone MP,
    4. et al

    . Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010;30:53S–64S.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Honein-AbouHaidar GN,
    2. Kastner M,
    3. Vuong V,
    4. et al

    . Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25:907–17.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Hyams T,
    2. Golden B,
    3. Sammarco J,
    4. et al

    . Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:754. Erratum in: BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 29;21(1):1026..

    OpenUrlPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Imaeda A,
    2. Bender D,
    3. Fraenkel L

    . What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:688–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Ko LK,
    2. Reuland D,
    3. Jolles M,
    4. Clay R,
    5. Pignone M

    . Cultural and linguistic adaptation of a multimedia colorectal cancer screening decision aid for Spanish-speaking Latinos. J Health Commun 2014;19:192–209.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Nagelhout E,
    2. Comarell K,
    3. Samadder NJ,
    4. Wu YP

    . Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a racially diverse population served by a safety-net clinic. J Community Health 2017;42:791–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Pignone MP,
    2. Brenner AT,
    3. Hawley S,
    4. et al

    . Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:45–50. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Redwood DG,
    2. Blake ID,
    3. Provost EM,
    4. Kisiel JB,
    5. Sacco FD,
    6. Ahlquist DA

    . Alaska Native patient and provider perspectives on the multitarget stool DNA test compared with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. J Prim Care Community Health 2019;10:2150132719884295.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Ruggieri DG,
    2. Bass SB,
    3. Rovito MJ,
    4. et al

    . Perceived colonoscopy barriers and facilitators among urban African American patients and their medical residents. J Health Commun 2013;18:372–90. .

    OpenUrlPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Schroy PC 3rd.,
    2. Emmons K,
    3. Peters E,
    4. et al

    . The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making 2011;31:93–107.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.
    1. Wortley S,
    2. Wong G,
    3. Kieu A,
    4. Howard K

    . Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments. Patient 2014;7:271–82.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Kiviniemi MT,
    2. Klasko-Foster LB,
    3. Erwin DO,
    4. Jandorf L

    . Decision-making and socioeconomic disparities in colonoscopy screening in African Americans. Health Psychol 2018 May;37:481–90.

    OpenUrlPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Schwartz PH,
    2. Imperiale TF,
    3. Perkins SM,
    4. Schmidt KK,
    5. Althouse S,
    6. Rawl SM

    . Impact of including quantitative information in a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2019;102:726–34.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Ellison J,
    2. Jandorf L,
    3. DuHamel K

    . Colonoscopy screening information preferences among urban hispanics. J Immigr Minor Health 2011;13:963–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Wunderlich T,
    2. Cooper G,
    3. Divine G,
    4. et al

    . Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 2010;80:358–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Parks PD,
    3. Weiser E,
    4. Jacobson DJ,
    5. Limburg PJ,
    6. Finney Rutten LJ

    . Barriers to utilization of three colorectal cancer screening options - data from a national survey. Prev Med Rep 2021;24:101508.

    OpenUrlPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Rogers CR,
    2. Rogers TN,
    3. Matthews P,
    4. et al

    . Psychosocial determinants of colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: understanding the role of masculine role norms, medical mistrust, and normative support. Ethn Health 2022;27:1103–22.

    OpenUrlPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Brittain K,
    2. Taylor JY,
    3. Loveland-Cherry C,
    4. Northouse L,
    5. Caldwell CH

    . Family support and colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J Nurse Pract 2012;8:522–33.

    OpenUrlPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Molokwu JC,
    2. Penaranda E,
    3. Shokar N

    . Decision-making preferences among older Hispanics participating in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. J Community Health 2017;42:1027–34.

    OpenUrlPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Bennett KF,
    2. von Wagner C,
    3. Robb KA

    . Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferences. Health Expect 2015;18:2032–41.

    OpenUrlPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Schwartz PH,
    2. O'Doherty KC,
    3. Bentley C,
    4. Schmidt KK,
    5. Burgess MM

    . Layperson views about the design and evaluation of decision aids: a public deliberation. Med Decis Making 2021;41:527–39.

    OpenUrlPubMed