A Review of 50 Years of International Literature on the External Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lindbloom EJ,
   2. Ewigman BG,
   3. Hickner JM

   . Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research. Med Care 2004;42.
2. 2.↵
   1. Thomas P,
   2. Griffiths F,
   3. Kai J,
   4. O'Dwyer A

   . Networks for research in primary health care. BMJ 2001;322:588–90.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Green LA,
   2. Dovey SM

   . Practice based primary care research networks: They work and are ready for full development and support. BMJ 2001;322:567–8.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. van Weel C,
   2. de Grauw W

   . Family practices registration networks contributed to primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:779–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. van WC,
   2. Rosser WW

   . Improving health care globally: A critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:S5–S16.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fleming DM,
   2. Norbury CA,
   3. Crombie DL

   . Annual and seasonal variation in the incidence of common diseases. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 1991;1–24.
7. 7.↵
   1. van Weel C

   . The continuous morbidity registration Nijmegen: Background and history of a Dutch general practice database. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14.
8. 8.↵
   1. Green LA,
   2. Simmons RL,
   3. Reed FM,
   4. Warren PS,
   5. Morrison JD

   . A family medicine information system: The beginning of a network for practicing and resident family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1978; 3:567–576.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Nelson EC,
   2. Kirk JW,
   3. Bise BW,
   4. et al

   . The Cooperative Information Project: Part 1: a sentinel practice network for service and research in primary care. J Fam Pract 1981;13.
10. 10.↵
    1. Nelson EC,
    2. Kirk JW,
    3. Bise BW,
    4. et al

    . The cooperative information project: Part 2: some initial clinical, quality assurance, and practice management studies. J Fam Pract 1981;13.
11. 11.↵
    1. Iverson DC,
    2. Calonge N,
    3. Miller RS,
    4. Niebauer LJ,
    5. Reed FM

    . The development and management of a primary care research network. Fam Med 1988;20:1978–87.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Hickner J

    . A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:1–10.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Van Weel C,
    2. Smith H,
    3. Beasley JW

    . Family practice research networks: experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000;49.
14. 14.↵
    1. Dania A,
    2. Nagykaldi Z,
    3. Haaranen A,
    4. et al

    . A review of 50 years of international literature on the internal environment of building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:762–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Arksey H,
    2. O'Malley L

    . Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract 2005;8.
16. 16.↵
    1. Binstock R,
    2. George L,
    3. Cutler S,
    4. Hendricks J,
    5. Schulz J

    1. Moren-Cross J,
    2. Lin N

    . Social networks and health. In: Binstock R, George L, Cutler S, Hendricks J, Schulz J, eds. Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Academic Press; 2006:111–5.
17. 17.↵
    1. Thomas P,
    2. Graffy J,
    3. Wallace P,
    4. Kirby M

    . How primary care networks can help integrate academic and service initiatives in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:235–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Brass DJ,
    2. Galaskiewicz J,
    3. Greve HR,
    4. Tsai W

    . Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad Manag J 2004;47.
19. 19.↵
    1. Braun V,
    2. Clarke V

    . Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3.
20. 20.↵
    1. Maguire M,
    2. Delahunt B

    . Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Irel J Teach Learn High Educn 2017;8.
21. 21.↵
    1. Vaismoradi M,
    2. Turunen H,
    3. Bondas T

    . Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Heal Sci 2013;15.
22. 22.↵
    American Academy of Family Physicians. Practice-based research networks in the 21st century: the pearls of research.; 1998. https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/nrn/pearlsofresearch.pdf.
23. 23.↵
    1. Fagnan LJ,
    2. Morris C,
    3. Shipman SA,
    4. Holub J,
    5. King A,
    6. Angier H

    . Characterizing a practice-based research network: Oregon rural practice-based research network (ORPRN) survey tools. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
24. 24.↵
    1. Williamson HA,
    2. Hector MG,
    3. LeFevre M,
    4. White RD

    . Establishing a rural family practice research network. Fam Med 1988;20.
25. 25.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. VanVorst RF,
    3. Main DS,
    4. Herbert C

    . Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4.
26. 26.↵
    1. Solberg LI,
    2. Cole PM,
    3. Seifert MH

    . The Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians' Research Network: a vehicle for practice-based research. Minn Med 1986;69.
27. 27.↵
    1. Pearce KA,
    2. Love MM,
    3. Barron MA,
    4. Matheny SC,
    5. Mahfoud Z

    . How and why to study the practice content of a practice-based research network. Ann Fam Med 2004;2.
28. 28.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Barton ED

    . OAFP starts practice-based resource/research network. J Okla State Med Assoc 1996;89.
29. 29.↵
    1. Sardell A

    . Clinical networks and clinician retention: the case of CDN. J Community Health 1996;21:437–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    RRNET. About RRNeT Institute for Integration of Medicine and Science. Accessed June 28, 2020. Available from: https://iims.uthscsa.edu/RRNeT/about.
31. 31.↵
    1. Dulin MF,
    2. Tapp H,
    3. Smith HA,
    4. Urquieta de Hernandez B,
    5. Furuseth OJ

    . A community based participatory approach to improving health in a Hispanic population. Implement Sci 2011;6.
32. 32.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Sears A

    . The ochin community information network: Bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patient-centered medical village. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:271–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Kuo GM,
    2. Steinbauer JR,
    3. Spann SJ

    . Conducting medication safety research projects in a primary care physician practice-based research network. J Am Pharm Assoc 2008;48.
34. 34.↵
    1. Anderko L,
    2. Lundeen S,
    3. Bartz C

    . The Midwest Nursing Centers Consortium Research Network: translating research into practice. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2006;7:101–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Serwint JR,
    2. Thoma KA,
    3. Dabrow SM

    , for the CORNET Investigatorset al. Comparing patients seen in pediatric resident continuity clinics and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey practices: A study from the Continuity Research Network. Pediatrics 2006;118:e849–e858.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Sloane PD,
    2. Callahan L,
    3. Kahwati L,
    4. Mitchell CM

    . Development of a practice-based patient cohort for primary care research. Fam Med 2006;38.
37. 37.↵
    1. Fagnan LJ

    . ORPRN “Blue Highways”. Reflections 2018;1–9.
38. 38.↵
    1. Carsley S,
    2. Borkhoff CM,
    3. Maguire JL,
    4. et al

    . Cohort profile: The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!). Int J Epidemiol 2015;44.
39. 39.↵
    1. Sills MR

    . SAFTINet overview for EDRC. presented to the Emergency Department Research Committee, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine. 6 January 2015. Published 2015. Accessed June 29, 2020. https://www.slideshare.net/MarionSills/saftinet-overview-for-edrc.
40. 40.↵
    1. Likumahuwa S,
    2. Song H,
    3. Singal R,
    4. et al

    . Building research infrastructure in community health centers: A Community Health Applied Research Network (CHARN) report. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26.
41. 41.↵
    1. McCloskey B,
    2. Grey M,
    3. Deshefy-Longhi T,
    4. Grey LJ

    . Aprn practice patterns in primary care. Nurse Pract 2003;28:39–44.

    OpenUrlPubMed
42. 42.↵
    Australian Primary Care Research Network APCReN. 2014 PHC Research Conference Highlights. Aust Prim Care Res Netw APCReN Newsl. Published online 2014. http://www.apcren.org.au/news-events/.
43. 43.↵
    1. Marley J

    . Establishing a rural research network. Med J Aust 1992;156.
44. 44.↵
    Australian Primary Care Research Network APCReN. APCReN. www.apcren.org.au.
45. 45.↵
    1. Gunn JM

    . Should Australia develop primary care research networks? Med J Aust 2002;177.
46. 46.↵
    1. Ried K,
    2. Farmer EA,
    3. Weston KM

    . Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: A strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Robertson S,
    2. Hornby C,
    3. Jones R

    . Joint working to develop R&D capacity in three rural primary care trusts. Prim health care res dev 2005;6:1–4.

    OpenUrl
48. 48.↵
    1. Comino E

    . The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia Churchill Fellowship 2002 Primary health care research (networks) in the United Kingdom. Published online 2002:1–38. http://nswcfa.churchilltrust.com.au/media/fellows/Comino_Elizabeth_2002-1.pdf.
49. 49.↵
    1. Hannay DR

    . Evaluation of a primary care research network in rural Scotland. Prim Heal Care Res Dev 2006;7.
50. 50.↵
    1. Nelson E,
    2. Conger B,
    3. Douglass R,
    4. et al

    . Functional health status levels of primary care patients. JAMA J JAMA 1983;249:3331.

    OpenUrl
51. 51.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Peterson KA

    . Primary care practice-based research networks: Working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3.
52. 52.↵
    1. Schweikardt C,
    2. Verheij RA,
    3. Donker GA,
    4. Coppieters Y

    . The historical development of the Dutch Sentinel General Practice Network from a paper-based into a digital primary care monitoring system. J Public Heal 2016;24.
53. 53.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Spofford M,
    4. et al

    . Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-based Research Network (SNW-PBRN.). J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24.
54. 54.↵
    1. Anderko L,
    2. Bartz C,
    3. Lundeen S

    . Practice-based research networks: Nursing centers and communities working collaboratively to reduce health disparities. Nurs Clin North Am 2005;40.
55. 55.↵
    1. Baldwin LM,
    2. Keppel GA,
    3. Davis A,
    4. Guirguis-Blake J,
    5. Force RW,
    6. Berg AO

    . Developing a Practice-based research network by integrating quality improvement: challenges and ingredients for success. Clin Transl Sci 2012;5:351–5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Love MM,
    2. Pearce KA,
    3. Williamson MA,
    4. Barron MA,
    5. Shelton BJ

    . Patients, practices, and relationships: challenges and lessons learned from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) CaRESS clinical trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:75–84.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. 57.↵
    1. Luijks H,
    2. van Boven K,
    3. Hartman T. O,
    4. Uijen A,
    5. van Weel C,
    6. Schers H

    . Purposeful incorporation of patient narratives in the medical record in the Netherlands. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34.
58. 58.↵
    1. Tu K,
    2. Sodhi S,
    3. Kidd MR,
    4. et al

    . The University of Toronto Family Medicine Report: caring for our diverse populations. Department of Family and Community Medicine; 2020. Accessed September 19, 2021. https://dfcm.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/university_of_toronto_family_medicine_report_-_caring_for_our_diverse_populations.pdf.
59. 59.↵
    1. Arkind J,
    2. Likumahuwa-Ackman S,
    3. Warren N,
    4. et al

    . Lessons learned from developing a patient engagement panel: an OCHIN report. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:632–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    1. Graffy J,
    2. Hines M,
    3. Fosam H,
    4. et al

    . Report. In: Report.; 2002.
61. 61.↵
    1. Stephens KA,
    2. Lin C-P,
    3. Baldwin L-M,
    4. et al

    . LC Data QUEST: a technical architecture for community federated clinical data sharing. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci proceedings AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci 2012;2012:57–62.

    OpenUrl
62. 62.↵
    1. Tyler CV,
    2. Werner JJ

    . Community-engagement strategies of the developmental disabilities practice-based research network (DD-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27.
63. 63.↵
    1. Sullivan F,
    2. Hinds A,
    3. Pitkethly M,
    4. Treweek S,
    5. Wilson P,
    6. Wyke S

    . Primary care research network progress in Scotland. Eur J Gen Pract 2014;20.
64. 64.↵
    1. Visentin G

    , on behalf of R&P Collaborative Group. R&P: the multiple meaning of a research project in general practice. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:S89–S92.

    OpenUrl
65. 65.↵
    1. Schers H,
    2. Bor H,
    3. van den Hoogen H,
    4. van Weel C

    . What went and what came? Morbidity trends in general practice from the Netherlands. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14 (Suppl 1):13–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Dulin MF

    . The Creation of PBRN to study health care delivery to a transitioning community (HS16023).; 2005.
67. 67.↵
    1. Lamont R,
    2. Fishman T,
    3. Sanders PF,
    4. Ofanoa M,
    5. Goodyear-Smith F

    . View from the canoe: Co-designing research pacific style. Ann Fam Med 2020;18:172–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
68. 68.↵
    1. Soós M,
    2. Temple-Smith M,
    3. Gunn J,
    4. Johnston-Ata'Ata K,
    5. Pirotta M

    . Establishing the Victorian primary care practice based research network. Aust Fam Physician 2010;39:.
69. 69.↵
    1. Thomas P,
    2. While A

    . Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice: the experience of the West London research network (WeLReN). J Interprof Care 2001;15.
70. 70.↵
    1. Williams RL,
    2. Shelley BM,
    3. Sussman AL

    . The marriage of community-based participatory research and practice-based research networks: can it work? A research involving outpatient settings network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22.
71. 71.↵
    1. Dulin MF,
    2. Ludden TM,
    3. Tapp H,
    4. et al

    . Geographic information systems (GIS) demonstrating primary care needs for a transitioning hispanic community. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23.
72. 72.↵
    1. Porcheret M,
    2. Hughes R,
    3. Evans D,
    4. et al

    . Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2004;11.
73. 73.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Sills MR,
    3. Graham D,
    4. et al

    . Stakeholder engagement in a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure implementation: a report from the SAFTINet practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:102–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
74. 74.↵
    1. Hayes H,
    2. Buckland S,
    3. Tarpey M

    . Briefing notes for researchers: public involvement in nhs, public health and social care research.; 2012. http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9938_INVOLVE_Briefing_Notes_WEB.pdf.
75. 75.↵
    1. Peckham S,
    2. Hutchison B

    . Developing primary care: the contribution of primary care research networks. Healthc Policy 2012;8.
76. 76.↵
    National Institute for Health Research. Patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a handbook for researchers by research design service London.; 2014. http://www.rds.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/RDS-PPI-Handbook-2014-v8-FINAL.pdf.
77. 77.↵
    1. Dovey S,
    2. Tilyard M

    . RNZCGP computer research network: an update. N Z Fam Physician 1999;26:37–9.

    OpenUrl
78. 78.↵
    1. Boydell L,
    2. Grandidier H,
    3. Rafferty C,
    4. McAteer C,
    5. Reilly P

    . General practice data retrieval: The Northern Ireland project. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:22–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
79. 79.↵
    Trent Focus Group. Trent focus. For the promotion of research and development in primary health care. Annual Report 1996–97.; 1997.
80. 80.↵
    1. Duggan A,
    2. Minkovitz CS,
    3. Chaffin M,
    4. et al

    . Creating a national home visiting research network. Pediatrics 2013;132:S82–S89.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
81. 81.↵
    1. Sayer GP,
    2. McGeechan K,
    3. Kemp A,
    4. et al

    . The general practice research network: The capabilities of an electronic patient management system for longitudinal patient data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003;12.
82. 82.↵
    1. De Clercq E,
    2. Vandenberghe H,
    3. Jonckheer P,
    4. Bastiaens H,
    5. Lafontaine MF,
    6. Van Casteren V

    . Assessment of a three-year experience with a belgian primary care data network. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002;93:163–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
83. 83.↵
    1. Ornstein SM,
    2. Jenkins RG

    . The Practice Partner Research Network: description of a novel national research network of computer-based patient records users. Carolina Heal Serv Policy Rev 1997;4:145–51.

    OpenUrl
84. 84.↵
    1. Rodnick JE

    . International Family Medicine Education: Tthe electronic medical record as the basis of a practice-based research network. Fam Med 2000;32:353–4. https://www.stfm.org/familymedicine/vol32issue5/Dolhun353.

    OpenUrl
85. 85.↵
    1. Vessey JA

    , Founding Oversight Board Members of MASNRN. Development of the Massachusetts School Nurse Research Network (MASNRN): a practice-based research network to improve the quality of school nursing practice. J Sch Nurs 2007;23:65–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
86. 86.↵
    1. Sullivan F,
    2. Butler C,
    3. Cupples M,
    4. Kinmonth AL

    . Primary care research networks in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 2007;334:1093–4.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
87. 87.↵
    1. Pace WD,
    2. West DR,
    3. Valuck RJ,
    4. Cifuentes M,
    5. Staton EW

    . Distributed Ambulatory Research in Theurapeutics Network (DARTNet): Summary Report.; 2009.
88. 88.↵
    1. Pulcini J,
    2. Sheetz A,
    3. Desisto M

    . Establishing a practice-based research network: Lessons from the massachusetts experience. J Sch Health 2008;78:172–4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
89. 89.↵
    1. Frayne SM,
    2. Carney DV,
    3. Bastian L,
    4. et al

    . The VA women's health practice-based research network: amplifying women veterans' voices in VA research. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:504–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
90. 90.↵
    ACORN. ACORN. Department of Family Medicine, VCU School of Medicine. Accessed June 28, 2020. https://familymedicine.vcu.edu/research/family-medicine-research/acorn/.
91. 91.↵
    1. Lionis C,
    2. Symvoulakis EK,
    3. Vardavas CI

    . Implementing family practice research in countries with limited resources: a stepwise model experienced in Crete, Greece. Fam Pract 2010;27:48–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
92. 92.↵
    1. Carter Y

    . Research opportunities in primary care. 1st ed. Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.
93. 93.↵
    Trent Focus Group. Trent focus. for the promotion of research and development in primary health care. Annual Report 2000-2001.; 2001.
94. 94.↵
    1. Cooke J,
    2. Owen J,
    3. Wilson A

    . Research and development at the health and social care interface in primary care: a scoping exercise in one National Health Service region. Heal Soc Care Community 2002;10.
95. 95.↵
    1. Dijkmans-Hadley B,
    2. Bonney A,
    3. Barnett SR

    . Development of an Australian practice-based research network as a community of practice. Aust J Prim Health 2015;21.
96. 96.↵
    1. Middelkoop BJ,
    2. Bohnen AM,
    3. Duisterhout JS,
    4. Pleumeekers HJ,
    5. Prins A

    . A computerized network of general practices in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1852–3.

    OpenUrlPubMed
97. 97.↵
    1. Jensen IB,
    2. Brämberg EB,
    3. Wåhlin C,
    4. et al

    . Promoting evidence-based practice for improved occupational safety and health at workplaces in Sweden. Report on a practice-based research network approach. IJERPH 2020;17:5283–15.

    OpenUrl
98. 98.↵
    1. Serwint JR

    , Continuity Clinic Special Interest Group, Ambulatory Pediatric Association. Multisite survey of pediatric residents' continuity experiences: their perceptions of the clinical and educational opportunities. Pediatrics 2001;107:E78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
99. 99.↵
    1. Fleming DM,
    2. Elliot AJ

    . Lessons from 40 years' surveillance of influenza in England and Wales. Epidemiol Infect 2008;136:866–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
100. 100.↵
     1. Smith HD,
     2. Dunleavey J

     . Wessex primary care research network: a report on two years progress. Southampt Heal J 1996;3:43–7.

     OpenUrl
101. 101.↵
     ACORN. ACORN: a PBRN project. Accessed June 28, 2020. http://www.acorn-arccim.com/pbrn/.
102. 102.↵
     1. Pitkethly M,
     2. Sullivan F

     . Networking four years of TayRen, a primary care research and development network. Prim Heal Care Res Dev 2003;4.
103. 103.↵
     1. Laurence CO,
     2. Beilby JJ,
     3. Marley JE,
     4. Newbury J,
     5. Wilkinson D,
     6. Symon B

     . Establishing a practice based primary care research network. The University Family Practice Network in South Australia. Aust Fam Physician 2001;30.
104. 104.↵
     1. Waters RL,
     2. Weston KM,
     3. Farmer E

     . Linking primary health care researchers in South Australia: a network strategy., SARNet Linking primary health care researchers in South Australia: a network 2004;13–21.
105. 105.↵
     1. Delaney BC,
     2. Peterson KA,
     3. Speedie S,
     4. Taweel A,
     5. Arvanitis TN,
     6. Richard Hobbs FD

     . Envisioning a learning health care system: the electronic primary care research network, a case study. Ann Fam Med 2012;10.
106. 106.↵
     1. Liaw ST,
     2. Taggart J,
     3. Dennis S,
     4. Yeo A

     . Data quality and fitness for purpose of routinely collected data–a general practice case study from an electronic practice-based research network (ePBRN). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011;2011.
107. 107.↵
     1. DeVoe JE,
     2. Likumahuwa S,
     3. Eiff MP,
     4. et al

     . Lessons learned and challenges ahead: Report from the OCHIN Safety Net West Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:560–4.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
108. 108.↵
     1. Gibson K,
     2. Szilagyi P,
     3. Swanger CM,
     4. et al

     . Physician perspectives on incentives to participate in practice-based research: a greater rochester practice-based research network (GR-PBRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23.
109. 109.↵
     1. Birtwhistle R,
     2. Keshavjee K,
     3. Lambert-Lanning A,
     4. et al

     . Building a pan-Canadian primary care sentinel surveillance network: initial development and moving forward. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22.
110. 110.↵
     1. Metsemakers JFM,
     2. Knottnerus JA,
     3. Van Schendel GJ,
     4. Kocken RJJ,
     5. Limonard CBG

     . Unlocking patients' records in general practice for research, medical education and quality assurance: the Registration Network Family Practices. Int J Biomed Comput 1996;42:43–50.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
111. 111.↵
     1. Slora EJ,
     2. Wasserman RC

     . PROS: a research network to enhance practice and improve child health. Pediatr Ann 2010;39:352–61.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
112. 112.↵
     1. del Torso S,
     2. van Esso D,
     3. Gerber A,
     4. et al

     . European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Setting network (EAPRASnet): a multi-national general paediatric research network for better child health. Child Care Health Dev 2010;36.
113. 113.↵
     1. Kwan BM,
     2. Graham DG,
     3. Sills MR,
     4. et al

     . Methods for the collection of patient reported outcomes in a safety net-oriented practice based research network. A SAFTINet Demonstration Project. poster presentation, AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting. June 24, 2013. Baltimore. Published 2013. Accessed June 29, 2020. https://www.slideshare.net/MarionSills/academy-health-pro-poster-final-2013-0620.
114. 114.↵
     1. Pace WD,
     2. Fox C,
     3. White T,
     4. Graham D,
     5. Schilling LM,
     6. West DR

     . The DARTNet Institute: seeking a sustainable support mechanism for electronic data enabled research networks. eGEMs (eGEMs) 2014;2:6.

     OpenUrl
115. 115.↵
     1. Pomernacki A,
     2. Carney DV,
     3. Kimerling R,
     4. et al

     . Lessons from initiating the first Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practicebased Research Network (WH-PBRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:649–57.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
116. 116.↵
     1. Metsemakers JFM,
     2. Hoppener P,
     3. Knottnerus JA,
     4. Kocken RJJ,
     5. Limonard CBG

     . Computerized health information in the Netherlands: a registration network of family practices. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42.
117. 117.↵
     1. Van Weel C,
     2. Schers H,
     3. Timmermans A

     . Health care in the Netherlands. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25 Suppl 1.
118. 118.↵
     1. Lobet MP,
     2. Stroobant A,
     3. Mertens R,
     4. et al

     . Tool for validation of the network of sentinel general practitioners in the Belgian health care system. Int J Epidemiol 1987;16:612–8.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
119. 119.↵
     1. Volmink JA,
     2. Furman SN

     . The South African Sentinel Practitioner Research Network organization, objectives, policies and methods. 1991; undefined. Published online.
120. 120.↵
     1. Truyers C,
     2. Goderis G,
     3. Dewitte H,
     4. Akker MV,
     5. Buntinx F

     . The Intego database: Background, methods and basic results of a Flemish general practice-based continuous morbidity registration project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014;14:48.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
121. 121.↵
     1. Chuan TN,
     2. Gan GL

     . Primary care research–a blueprint for action for Singapore. Asia Pac J Public Health 2001;13:49–53.

     OpenUrlPubMed
122. 122.↵
     1. Volmink J

     . SASPREN - A new development in family practice research in South Africa. South African Med J 1996;86.
123. 123.↵
     Department of Health. Research and Development Directorate. Best research for best health. introducing a new national health research strategy. Comprehensive NHS research network. London: Department of Health; Version 2; 2006. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/568772/dh_4127152_v2.pdf.
124. 124.↵
     Trent Focus Group. Trent focus. for the promotion of research and development in primary health care. Annual report 1999–2000; 1999.
125. 125.↵
     1. Dovey SM,
     2. Tilyard MW

     . The computer research network of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners: An approach to general practice research in New Zealand. Br J Gen Pract 1996;46.
126. 126.↵
     1. Okkes IM,
     2. Groen A,
     3. Oskam SK,
     4. Lamberts H

     . Advantages of long observation in episode-oriented electronic patient records in family practice. Methods Inf Med 2001;40:229–35.

     OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
127. 127.↵
     1. Selby K,
     2. Cornuz J,
     3. Senn N

     . Establishment of a representative practice-based research network (PBRN) for the monitoring of primary care in Switzerland. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28.
128. 128.↵
     1. Schilling LM,
     2. Kwan BM,
     3. Drolshagen CT,
     4. et al

     . Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) technology infrastructure for a distributed data network. eGEMs (eGEMs) 2013;1:11.

     OpenUrl
129. 129.↵
     1. Dulin MF,
     2. Tapp H,
     3. Smith HA,
     4. et al

     . A trans-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of social determinants of health in a hispanic population. BMC Public Health 2012;12.
130. 130.↵
     1. Chmiel C,
     2. Bhend H,
     3. Senn O,
     4. et al

     . The FIRE project: a milestone for research in primary care in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;141:1–7.

     OpenUrl
131. 131.↵
     1. Rizza A,
     2. Kaplan V,
     3. Senn O

     , FIRE study groupet al. Age- and gender-related prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care: the Swiss FIRE project. BMC Fam Pract 2012;13:113.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
132. 132.↵
     1. Maro JC,
     2. Platt R,
     3. Holmes JH,
     4. et al

     . Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:341

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
133. 133.↵
     1. Gill JM,
     2. Klinkman MS,
     3. Chen YX

     . Antidepressant medication use for primary care patients with and without medical comorbidities: A national Electronic Health Record (EHR) network study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:499–508.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
134. 134.↵
     1. Adams J,
     2. Peng W,
     3. Steel A,
     4. et al

     . A cross-sectional examination of the profile of chiropractors recruited to the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN): A sustainable resource for future chiropractic research. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015830.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
135. 135.↵
     1. O'Regan A,
     2. Hayes P,
     3. O'Connor R,
     4. et al

     . The University of Limerick Education and Research Network for General Practice (ULEARN-GP): practice characteristics and general practitioner perspectives. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:25.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
136. 136.↵
     1. Wasserman RC,
     2. Slora EJ,
     3. Bocian AB,
     4. et al

     . Pediatric research in office settings (PROS): A national practice-based research network to improve children's health care. Pediatrics 1998;102:1350–7.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
137. 137.↵
     1. Pirotta M,
     2. Temple-Smith M

     . Practice-based research networks. Aust Fam Physician 2017;46:793–5.

     OpenUrl
138. 138.↵
     1. Peterson KA,
     2. Fontaine P,
     3. Speedie S

     . The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:93–7.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
139. 139.↵
     1. Deshefy-Longhi T,
     2. Swartz MK,
     3. Grey M

     . Establishing a practice-based research network of advanced practice registered nurses in southern New England. Nurs Outlook 2002;50:127–31.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
140. 140.↵
     1. Rosser WW,
     2. Green L

     . Update from ASPN. Can Fam Physician 1989;35.
141. 141.↵
     1. Wasserman R,
     2. Serwint JR,
     3. Kuppermann N,
     4. Srivastava R,
     5. Dreyer B

     . The APA and the rise of pediatric generalist network research. Acad Pediatr 2011;11:195–204.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
142. 142.↵
     1. Morinis J,
     2. Maguire J,
     3. Khovratovich M,
     4. McCrindle BW,
     5. Parkin PC,
     6. Birken CS

     . Paediatric obesity research in early childhood and the primary care setting: The TARGet Kids! research network. IJERPH 2012;9:1343–54.

     OpenUrl
143. 143.↵
     1. Green LA,
     2. Wood M,
     3. Becker L,
     4. et al

     . The Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network: Purpose, methods, and policies. J Fam Pract 1984;18.
144. 144.↵
     1. LeBailly S,
     2. Ariza A,
     3. Bayldon B,
     4. Binns HJ

     . The origin and evolution of a regional pediatric practice-based research network: practical and methodological lessons from the Pediatric Practice Research Group. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2003;33.
145. 145.↵
     1. Koskela TH

     . Building a primary care research network–lessons to learn. Scand J Prim Health Care 2017;35.
146. 146.↵
     1. Nuttall J,
     2. Hood K,
     3. Verheij TJ,
     4. et al

     . Building an international network for a primary care research program: Reflections on challenges and solutions in the set-up and delivery of a prospective observational study of acute cough in 13 European countries. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:78.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
147. 147.↵
     1. Solberg LI,
     2. Mayer TR,
     3. Seifert M,
     4. Cole PM

     . The Minnesota AFP research panel: A model for collaborative practicing family physician research. Fam Med 1983;15:139–42.

     OpenUrl
148. 148.↵
     1. Beasley JW,
     2. Cox NS,
     3. Livingston BT,
     4. et al

     . Development and operation of the Wisconsin Research Network. Wis Med J 1991;90.
149. 149.↵
     1. Fleming DM

     . Weekly Returns Service of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Commun Dis Public Heal 1999;2:96–100.

     OpenUrl
150. 150.↵
     AAFP. Affiliated PBRNs–National Research Network. Accessed August 13, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/nrn/nrn/pbrns.html.
151. 151.↵
     1. Golden RE,
     2. Klap R,
     3. Carney DV,
     4. et al

     . Promoting learning health system feedback loops: experience with a VA practice-based research network card study: VA Card Study Promotes Learning Health System. Healthcare 2021;8:100484.

     OpenUrl
152. 152.↵
     1. Clothier HJ,
     2. Fielding JE,
     3. Kelly HA

     . An evaluation of the Australian Sentinel Practice Research Network (ASPREN) surveillance for influenza-like illness. Commun Dis Intell 2005;29.
153. 153.↵
     1. Lionis C,
     2. Petelos E,
     3. Papadakis S,
     4. et al

     . Towards evidence-informed integration of public health and primary health care: experiences from Crete. Public Heal Panor 2018;04:699–714.

     OpenUrl
154. 154.↵
     Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy Phase Three: 2010-2014.; 2010.
155. 155.↵
     Department of Health. Research and development for a first class service: R&D funding in the new NHS. Published 2000. Accessed May 25, 2016. www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dID=16702&Rendition=Web.
156. 156.↵
     NHS Executive. Department of Health. information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998–2005. A National Strategy for Local Implementation.; 1998.
157. 157.↵
     1. Ried K,
     2. Farmer EA,
     3. Weston KM

     . Aims and objectives for the SARNet research network. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:Additional file. https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2296-7-8/MediaObjects/12875_2005_139_MOESM1_ESM.pdf.
158. 158.↵
     The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). Program Primary Focus. Accessed January 31, 2012. http://www.zonmw.nl/en/programmes/primary-focus/programme/.
159. 159.↵
     Funding of research and research-training; stimulating practice-based research by the Netherlands Research Council on Health Research ZonMW. Accessed March 10, 2004. http://zonmw.collexis.net/default.asp?key=prog.
160. 160.↵
     1. Fontaine P,
     2. Mendenhall TJ,
     3. Peterson K,
     4. Speedie SM

     . The “Measuring Outcomes of Clinical Connectivity” (MOCC) trial: investigating data entry errors in the electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
161. 161.↵
     1. Birtwhistle RV

     . Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network: a developing resource for family medicine and public health. Can Fam Physician 2011;57.
162. 162.↵
     The Netherlands School of Primary Care Research. Netherlands School of Public Health and Care Research. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.researchschoolcare.nl/.
163. 163.↵
     National Institute for Health Research. Clinical Research Network. income distribution from NIHR CRN industry portfolio studies.; 2014. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-and-support/documents/Study-Support-Service/Early-contact-and-engagement/Costing-Templates/LCRN Guidance S12 - Income Distirbution Model Guidance v2.0.pdf.
164. 164.↵
     National Institute for Health Research. Clinical Research Network. five year strategic plan for research delivery: 2012–2017.; 2012.
165. 165.↵
     1. Leitch S

     . New Zealand needs a practice based research network. J Prim Health Care 2016;8:9.

     OpenUrl
166. 166.↵
     1. Kljakovic M,
     2. Seddon T,
     3. Reinken J,
     4. McLeod D

     . The rise and fall of a general practice information network. N Z Fam Physician. Published online 1992;73–6.
167. 167.↵
     1. van Weel C,
     2. Rosser WW

     . Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med 2004;2 Suppl 2:. In:. Vol.
168. 168.↵
     1. Evans TW

     , Department of Health. Research and Development Directorate. Best Research for best health. a new national health research strategy. 2006;6.
169. 169.↵
     1. Olsen DP,
     2. Dixon JK,
     3. Grey M,
     4. Deshefy-Longhi T,
     5. Demarest JC

     . Privacy concerns of patients and nurse practitioners in primary care–an APRNet study. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2005;17.
170. 170.↵
     1. Fagnan LJ

     . meta-network Learning and Research Center Meta-LARC. Grantome, U.S. National Institute of Health. Published 2015. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://grantome.com/grant/NIH/P30-HS021639-02.
171. 171.↵
     Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program. Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://ncats.nih.gov/ctsa.
172. 172.↵
     HIPAA. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) | CDC. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/hipaa.html.
173. 173.↵
     Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - HealthCare.gov glossary | HealthCare.gov. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act/.
174. 174.↵
     PCORI. PCORI | Our story. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.pcori.org/about-us/our-story.
175. 175.↵
     1. Metsemakers JFM

     . Unlocking patients' records in general practice for research, medical education and quality assurance: the registration network family practices. 1994;. Published online.
176. 176.↵
     1. Graham DG,
     2. Spano MS,
     3. Stewart TV,
     4. Staton EW,
     5. Meers A,
     6. Pace WD

     . Strategies for planning and launching PBRN research studies: a project of the Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
177. 177.↵
     1. Fleming DM,
     2. Crombie DL

     . The incidence of common infectious diseases: The weekly returns service of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Health Trends 1985;17.
178. 178.↵
     1. Adams J,
     2. Steel A,
     3. Chang S,
     4. Sibbritt D

     . Helping address the national research and research capacity needs of Australian chiropractic: Iitroducing the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN) project. Chiropr Man Ther 2015;23.
179. 179.↵
     1. Mehta P,
     2. Adams J,
     3. Sibbritt D,
     4. Jones T,
     5. Leaver A,
     6. Verhagen A

     . Introducing the Collaborative Australian Physiotherapy Research Initiative (CAPRI) project.; 2021. https://osf.io/rfy95/download.
180. 180.↵
     1. van der Lei J,
     2. Duisterhout JS,
     3. Westerhof HP,
     4. et al

     . The introduction of computer-based patient records in the Netherlands. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1036–41.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
181. 181.↵
     1. Culpepper L,
     2. Froom J

     . The international primary care network: Purpose, methods, and policies. Fam Med 1988;20.
182. 182.↵
     Australian Association for Academic Primary Care Inc. The APCReN Story, Two Years on. Published online 2015; 5:Issue.
183. 183.↵
     1. Boffin N,
     2. Bossuyt N,
     3. Vanthomme K,
     4. Van Casteren V

     . Readiness of the Belgian network of sentinel general practitioners to deliver electronic health record data for surveillance purposes: Results of survey study. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11:50.

     OpenUrlPubMed
184. 184.↵
     1. Laux G,
     2. Koerner T,
     3. Rosemann T,
     4. Beyer M,
     5. Gilbert K,
     6. Szecsenyi J

     . The CONTENT project: a problem-oriented, episode-based electronic patient record in primary care. Inform Prim Care 2005;13.
185. 185.↵
     1. Taggart J,
     2. Liaw ST,
     3. Dennis S,
     4. et al

     . The University of NSW electronic practice based research network: disease registers, data quality and utility. Stud Heal Technol Inform 2012;178.
186. 186.↵
     1. Slora EJ,
     2. Thoma KA,
     3. Wasserman RC,
     4. Pedlow SE,
     5. Bocian AB

     . Patient visits to a national practice-based research network: comparing pediatric research in office settings with the national ambulatory medical care survey. Pediatrics 2006;118:e228–e234.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
187. 187.↵
     1. Froom J,
     2. Culpepper L

     . Otitis media in day-care children: a report from the International Primary Care Network. J Fam Pract 1991;32.
188. 188.↵
     1. Cole AM,
     2. Stephens KA,
     3. Keppel GA,
     4. Lin CP,
     5. Baldwin LM

     . Implementation of a health data-sharing infrastructure across diverse primary care organizations. J Ambul Care Manage 2014;37:164–70.

     OpenUrl
189. 189.↵
     Primary Care MultiEthnic Network (PRIME Net). Center in Practice-Based Research and learning. 2020. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/PRIMENet.pdf.
190. 190.↵
     1. Pace WD,
     2. Cifuentes M,
     3. Valuck RJ,
     4. Staton EW,
     5. Brandt EC,
     6. West DR

     . An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:338.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
191. 191.↵
     1. Trinh L,
     2. Macartney K,
     3. McIntyre P,
     4. Chiu C,
     5. Dey A,
     6. Menzies R

     . Investigating adverse events following immunisation with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine using electronic General Practice data. Vaccine 2017;35:1524–9.

     OpenUrl
192. 192.↵
     1. de Lusignan S,
     2. van Weel C

     . The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: Opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract 2006;23.
193. 193.↵
     1. Stephenson E,
     2. O'Neill B,
     3. Gronsbell J,
     4. et al

     . Changes in family medicine visits across sociodemographic groups after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study. C Open 2021;9.
194. 194.↵
     1. Galvin S,
     2. Callan A,
     3. Cormican M,
     4. et al

     . Improving antimicrobial prescribing in Irish primary care through electronic data collection and surveillance: A feasibility study Epidemiology and research methodology in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16.
195. 195.↵
     1. Cole AM,
     2. Stephens KA,
     3. Keppel GA,
     4. Estiri H,
     5. Baldwin L-M

     . Extracting electronic health record data in a practice-based research network: lessons learned from collaborations with translational researchers. eGEMs (eGEMs) 2016;4:4.

     OpenUrl
196. 196.↵
     UTOPIAN | Department of Family & Community Medicine. About UTOPIAN. Accessed September 19, 2021. https://www.dfcm.utoronto.ca/about-utopian.
197. 197.↵
     1. Lieberman MI

     . Medical Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC). Presentation. Published 2006. https://www.amia.org/sites/amia.org/files/2006-Policy-Meeting-Medical-2006-Policy-Meeting-Quality-Improvement-Consortium.pdf.
198. 198.↵
     1. Coleman N,
     2. Halas G,
     3. Peeler W,
     4. Casaclang N,
     5. Williamson T,
     6. Katz A

     . From patient care to research: a validation study examining the factors contributing to data quality in a primary care electronic medical record database. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:11.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
199. 199.↵
     1. Peterson KA,
     2. Delaney BC,
     3. Arvanitis TN,
     4. et al

     . A model for the electronic support of practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2012;10.
200. 200.↵
     1. Kadhim-Saleh A,
     2. Green M,
     3. Williamson T,
     4. Hunter D,
     5. Birtwhistle R

     . Validation of the diagnostic algorithms for 5 chronic conditions in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN): a Kingston Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) report. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:159–67.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
201. 201.↵
     1. Williamson T,
     2. Green ME,
     3. Birtwhistle R,
     4. et al

     . Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:367–72.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
202. 202.↵
     1. Burt RS

     . Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987;92.
203. 203.↵
     1. Liu W,
     2. Sidhu A,
     3. Beacom AM,
     4. Valente TW

     . Social Network Theory. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects 2017:1–12. In:. Wiley.
204. 204.↵
     1. Darbyshire J,
     2. Sitzia J,
     3. Cameron D,
     4. et al

     . Extending the clinical research network approach to all of healthcare. Ann Oncol 2011;22.
205. 205.↵
     1. Pace WD,
     2. Fagnan LJ,
     3. West DR

     . The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) relationship: Delivering on an opportunity, challenges, and future directions. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:489–92.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
206. 206.↵
     1. Rhyne RL,
     2. Fagnan LJ

     . Practice-based research network (PBRN) engagement: 20+ years and counting. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31.
207. 207.↵
     1. Fagnan LJ,
     2. Davis M,
     3. Deyo RA,
     4. Werner JJ,
     5. Stange KC

     . Linking practice-based research networks and clinical and translational science awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad Med 2010;85:476–83.

     OpenUrlPubMed
208. 208.↵
     1. Riley-Behringer M,
     2. Davis MM,
     3. Werner JJ,
     4. Fagnan LJ,
     5. Stange KC

     . The evolving collaborative relationship between Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) and Clinical and Translational Science Awardees (CTSAs). J Clin Transl Sci 2017;1:301–9.

     OpenUrl
209. 209.↵
     1. Binienda J,
     2. Neale AV,
     3. Wallace LS

     . Future directions for practice-based research networks (PBRNs): A CERA survey. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31.
210. 210.↵
     1. Spears W,
     2. Tsoh JY,
     3. Potter MB,
     4. et al

     . Use of community engagement strategies to increase research participation in practice-based research networks (PBRNs.). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27.
211. 211.↵
     1. Tapp H,
     2. Dulin M

     . The science of primary health-care improvement: Potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med 2010;235.
212. 212.↵
     1. Curro FA,
     2. Robbins DA,
     3. Millenson ML,
     4. Chester HC,
     5. Naftolin F

     . Person-centric clinical trials: An opportunity for the good clinical practice (GCP)-practice-based research network. J Clin Pharmacol 2013;53:1091–4.

     OpenUrl
213. 213.↵
     1. Robbins DA,
     2. Curro FA,
     3. Fox CH

     . Defining patient-centricity: opportunities, challenges, and implications for clinical care and research. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2013;47:349–55.

     OpenUrl
214. 214.↵
     1. Griffiths F,
     2. Wild A,
     3. Harvey J,
     4. Fenton E

     . The productivity of primary care research networks. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50.
215. 215.↵
     1. Abbott S,
     2. Gunnell C

     . Developing R&D capacity in primary care nursing: report of a research project. Prim health care res dev 2005;6:95–100.

     OpenUrl
216. 216.↵
     1. Tasche M,
     2. Oosterberg E,
     3. Kolnaar B,
     4. Rosmalen K

     . Inventarisatie van lacunes in huisartsgeneeskundige kennis. HUWE 2001;44:709–13.

     OpenUrl
217. 217.↵
     1. Green LA,
     2. Hames CG,
     3. Nutting PA

     . Potential of practice-based research networks: Experiences from ASPN. J Fam Pract 1994;38.
218. 218.↵
     Trent Focus Group. Trent focus. for the promotion of research and development in primary health care. Annual Report 1997–1998.; 1998.
219. 219.↵
     The Folsom Group. Communities of solution: The Folsom report revisited. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:250–60.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
220. 220.↵
     1. Green LW

     . Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Family Practice 2008;25:i20–i24.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
221. 221.↵
     1. Beasley JW,
     2. Starfield B,
     3. Van Weel C,
     4. Rosser WW,
     5. Haq CL

     . Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:518–26.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
222. 222.↵
     1. Westfall JM,
     2. Roper R,
     3. Gaglioti A,
     4. Nease DE. Jr.

     . Practice-based research networks: strategic opportunities to advance implementation research for health equity. Ethn Dis 2019;29:113–8.

     OpenUrlPubMed
223. 223.↵
     1. Tapp H,
     2. White L,
     3. Steuerwald M,
     4. Dulin M

     . Use of community-based participatory research in primary care to improve healthcare outcomes and disparities in care. J Comp Eff Res 2013;2:405–19.

     OpenUrl
224. 224.↵
     1. Nease D,
     2. Greiver M

     . 2021 PBRN conference: “embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion.” Ann Fam Med 2021;19:470–1.

     OpenUrlFREE Full Text
225. 226.↵
     1. Smith H

     . The Federation of Primary Care Research Networks: a national initiative to enhance networking locally. Prim Heal Care Res Dev 2000;1:3–4.

     OpenUrl
226. 227.↵
     Practice-Based Research Networks | UK Center for Clinical and Translation Science. Accessed October 1, 2021. https://www.ccts.uky.edu/about-ccts/cores/community-engagement-and-research/practice-based-research-networks.
227. 228.↵
     TAFP - Introducing the meta-network for practice-based research. Accessed October 1, 2021. https://www.tafp.org/news/tfp/spring-2010/research-network.
228. 229.↵
     1. van Staa TP,
     2. Dyson L,
     3. McCann G,
     4. et al

     . The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials. Health Technol Assess) 2014;18:1–146.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
229. 230.↵
     1. Haggerty T,
     2. Cole AM,
     3. Xiang J,
     4. Mainous AG,
     5. Seehusen D

     . Family medicine-specific practice-based research network productivity and clinical and translational sciences award program affiliation. South Med J 2017;110.
230. 231.↵
     1. Mold JW,
     2. Lipman PD,
     3. Durako SJ

     . Coordinating centers and multi-practice-based research network (PBRN) research. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25.
231. 232.↵
     1. Lionis C,
     2. Duijker G,
     3. Angelaki A,
     4. et al

     . Practice-Based Research Network in Primary Care: A lacking story and learning points from an empirical model on Crete. In: 1st Joint Meeting of the European General Practice Research Network and European Rural and Isolated Practitioners Association 17th - 20th October 2013.; 2013.
232. 233.↵
     AHRQ. PBRN Registry | Practice-Based Research Networks | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2019. Accessed October 13, 2020. https://pbrn.ahrq.gov/pbrn-registry.
233. 234.↵
     1. Jones C

     . An environmental scan of practice-based research networks.; 2006. Accessed August 16, 2020. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/23017131/an-environmental-scan-of-practice-based-research-networks.
234. 235.↵
     Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG). Overview of underresearched areas in family medicine. 2004. Accessed March 9, 2004. http://nhg.artsennet.nl/content/resources/AMGATE_6059_104_TICH_L866838437/AMGATE_6059_104_TICH_R1196231005919511.
235. 236.↵
     1. Adams J,
     2. Steel A,
     3. Moore C,
     4. Amorin-Woods L,
     5. Sibbritt D

     . Establishing the ACORN National Practitioner Database: strategies to recruit practitioners to a national practice-based research network. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016;39:594–602.

     OpenUrlPubMed
236. 237.↵
     1. Evans TW

     . Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy. Clin Med (Lond) 2006;6:435–7.

     OpenUrl
237. 238.↵
     Australian Primary Care Research Network. APCReN, the APCReN story, two years on. Newsletter. 2015;5:Issue. Published online 2.
238. 239.↵
     National Institutes of Health - US Department of Health and Human Services. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. NIH roadmap and roadmap-affiliated initiatives. Published 2011. Accessed December 17, 2016. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/funding/grants/announcements/roadmap/.
239. 240.↵
     Archive Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. US Department of health & Social Services. Agency for healthcare research and quality: Reauthorization fact sheet. Published 1999. Accessed December 17, 2016. https://archive.ahrq.gov/about/ahrqfact.htm.
240. 241.↵
     Department of Health and Human Services. Institutional clinical and translational science award (U54): Part I overview information. Accessed September 10, 2008. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-07– 007.html.
241. 242.↵
     NIH. Workshop proceedings: inviting public participation in clinical research: Building trust through partnerships. Published 2008. Accessed September 10, 2008. ports/October_2004_COPR_ WORKSHOP_Proceedings.pdf.
242. 243.↵
     American recovery and reinvestment act of 2009. pub. L. 111-5, 123 stat. 115. Published 2009. Accessed December 15, 2016. https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/1/tex.
243. 244.↵
     1. Wallace LS,
     2. Angier H,
     3. Huguet N,
     4. et al

     . Patterns of electronic portal use among vulnerable patients in a nationwide practice-based research network: from the OCHIN Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:592–603.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
244. 245.↵
     1. DeVoe JE,
     2. Likumahuwa-Ackman SM,
     3. Angier HE,
     4. et al

     . A Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) roadmap for evaluating COVID-19 in community health centers: A report from the OCHIN PBRN. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:774–8.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
245. 246.↵
     1. Gaglioti AH,
     2. Werner JJ,
     3. Rust G,
     4. Fagnan LJ,
     5. Neale AV

     . Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) bridging the gaps between communities, funders, and policymakers. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29.
246. 247.↵
     1. Hickner J,
     2. Green LA

     . Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) in the United States: growing and still going after all these years. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:541–5.

     OpenUrlFREE Full Text
247. 248.↵
     1. Anderson S,
     2. Allen P,
     3. Peckham S,
     4. Goodwin N

     . Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst 2008;6:7.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
248. 249.↵
     1. Munn Z,
     2. Peters MDJ,
     3. Stern C,
     4. Tufanaru C,
     5. McArthur A,
     6. Aromataris E

     . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:1–7.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
249. 250.↵
     1. Temple-Smith M,
     2. Novy K,
     3. Manski-Nankervis J-A,
     4. Lau P,
     5. Sanci L

     , MACH. A Snapshot of Australian Practice Based Research Networks in Primary Care.; 2021.