Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating increased odds of elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) for food-insecure patients. Synthesis of the 5 studies resulted in a nonsignificant combined odds ratio of 1.18 [95% CI, 0.90-1.56, n = 22,746, Q(df = 4) = 5.5, I2 = 27%].
- Figure 2.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating food insecurity and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) measurement. Hedges' g, standardized mean differences with a small size correction, were calculated from the primary data of the 5 studies. Meta-analysis resulted in a nonsignificant effect: gLDL = -0.02 [95% CI, -0.28, 0.25, n = 1,143, Q(df = 4) = 17, I2 = 76%].
- Figure 3.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating increased odds of low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) for food-insecure patients. Synthesis of the 6 studies resulted in a nonsignificant combined odds ratio of ORHDL = 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98, 1.06, n = 28,557, Q(df = 5) = 2.7, I2 = 0%].
- Figure 4.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating food insecurity and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Hedges' g, standardized mean differences with a small size correction, were calculated from the primary data of the 6 studies. Meta-analysis resulted in a nonsignificant effect: gHDL = -0.01 [95% CI, -0.07, 0.04, n = 7,096, Q(df = 5) = 3.20, I2 = 0%].
- Figure 5.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating increased odds of elevated total cholesterol for food-insecure patients. Synthesis of the 6 studies resulted in a nonsignificant combined odds ratio of ORTC = 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95, 1.05, n = 28,225, Q(df = 5) = 4.3, I2 = 0%].
- Figure 6.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating food insecurity and total cholesterol levels. Hedges' g, standardized mean differences with a small size correction, were calculated from the primary data of the 5 studies. Meta-analysis resulted in a nonsignificant effect: gTC = 0.02 [95% CI, -0.20, 0.24, n = 1,614, Q(df = 4) = 13, I2 = 70%].
- Figure 7.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating increased odds of elevated triglycerides for food-insecure patients. Synthesis of the 4 studies resulted in a nonsignificant combined odds ratio of ORTG = 1.13 [95% CI, 0.80, 1.61, n = 16,107, Q(df = 3) = 3.29, I2= 10%].
- Figure 8.
Meta-analysis of adult studies investigating food insecurity and triglycerides levels. Hedges' g, standardized mean differences with a small size correction, were calculated from the primary data of the 5 studies. Meta-analysis resulted in a nonsignificant effect: gTG = 0.02 [95% CI, -0.22, 0.27, n = 958, Q(df = 4) = 10.2, I2 = 61%].
- Figure 1.
Flow chart displaying the study selection process.
- Figure 2.
Meta-analysis of adult studies (n = 9,212) investigating increased odds of self-reported dyslipidemia for food insecure patients. Synthesis of the three studies resulted in a significant combined odds ratio of 1.15 [95%CI: 1.08–1.22, n = 9212, Q (df = 2) = 2.2, I2 = 10%].
