Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
EditorialEditors' Note

The “Telehealth Divide”—Who Are the Underserved, and What Care Is Improved?

Marjorie A. Bowman, Dean A. Seehusen and Christy J. W. Ledford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 451-453; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.220131
Marjorie A. Bowman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dean A. Seehusen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christy J. W. Ledford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

After years of slow progress, the COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid adoption of telehealth and telemedicine. The transition was not uniform across demographic groups, reflecting social determinants of health. This special issue of JABFM highlights many lessons learned and reviews insights gained by patients, clinicians, and health care administrators about telehealth and telemedicine during the pandemic. The focus on research on the COVID-19 pandemic is turning increasingly toward the long-term impact of the pandemic. Reports on Medicare wellness visits, drug safety, medical abortion, and the differences in scope and location of practice by race and ethnicity of family physicians can also be found in this issue.

Telemedicine Visits and the Vulnerable/Underserved

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a dramatic expansion of telehealth and telemedicine. Patients underserved within the traditional in-person care model experience widening disparities in the telemedicine model, even when the patient is served by a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). A report from Texas—which ranks poorly in the number of primary care physicians per capita—finds provider characteristics were not associated with telemedicine visits but patient characteristics were.1 Similarly, Leung et al2 found the most vulnerable patients in their academic inner-city practice were also the least likely to attend video visits, even with documented access to broadband Internet.

Another practice successfully leveraged technology to care for vulnerable patients, sending a nurse to the home to do formal assessments and assist with a clinician video visit.3 This led to many positive outcomes, such as designation of a needed guardian. In another important report, Hall et al4 compared the experience of both FQHC clinicians and patients in 2 separate trials comparing mental health professional telephone consultation with the patient's primary care clinician to mental health clinical care assumed by the mental health provider. The results suggest positive outcomes yet differences in the merits of these 2 different strategies.

Anaya et al5 propose important policy solutions for states and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to help address structural determinants of telemedicine barriers experienced by historically marginalized, low-income, and limited English-speaking populations.

Telehealth and Telemedicine Insights

Multiple reports provide insights to telehealth and telemedicine implementation. In West Virginia, the use of telemedicine increased visit completion rates by a clinically relevant amount.6 In a report from Arizona, the time to a follow-up visit was different for telemedicine versus in-person visits.7 Another report compares the number of diagnoses managed through telemedicine and office visits.8 A post-televisit survey9 provides patient satisfaction data. The least liked feature? No surprise, perhaps—it was a copayment.

Segal et al10 and Hall et al11 provide a rich variety of perceptions on telehealth through interviews with patients, clinicians, and selected others. Separately, Fraze et al12 provide the perspectives on telehealth from administrators of health care organizations, bringing other concepts to our understanding of telehealth, including loyalty of patients. Segal and colleagues take the next step, proposing a framework for appropriate virtual care.13

Burdick et al.14 describe postadmission care (transitional care) that reduced readmissions, providing information on steps taken that created the difference and reminding providers that transitional care can include telemedicine visits. Stewart et al15 report positive outcomes with telehealth and Fitbit data in an innovative adaptation of the National Diabetes Prevention Program.

Online portals are also potentially powerful channels for telemedicine that are concurrently overused, underused, and undervalued by many. Tuan et al16 conducted a retrospective study of portal use for patients at 18 family medicine clinics over a 5-year period using an electronic access log.

COVID-19

Canada's eConsult Service proved highly helpful during the COVID-19 pandemic—primary care clinicians could submit a question to a specific specialty physician and get a quick reply.17

A sense of loneliness during the pandemic would not be unexpected, but what is the depth and breadth? Lonergan-Cullum et al provide suggestions for family physicians caring for the many patients that might be struggling with loneliness.18

Many family physicians and other providers worry about the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 on the future health of our patients. In a study of college students,19 many had asymptomatic COVID-19, while a significant minority reported persistent symptoms. Concurrently, Kansas family physicians have strongly positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, along multiple dimensions.20

This Issue's Potpourri

Family physician practices (n = 145 across 36 states) use a wide variety of tools for the annual Medicare wellness visit, as documented by Loskutova et al,21 and their use is quite varied.

After a rigorous systematic literature search, Young et al22 (sadly) found few reports that investigated interventions to improve outpatient drug safety. Less surprisingly, recognized medication lists to warn of harms substantially overestimate actual harms. Medication abortion has received much recent attention. In a qualitative study, Razona et al23 report family physician perspectives on barriers and motivations to medical abortion provision.

In this issue's policy brief, Wang et al24 report on differences in scope and location of practice by race and ethnicity of family physicians. The results may not be what is commonly presumed.

Notes

  • Conflict of interest: The authors are editors of the JABFM.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/35/3/451.full.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Adepoju O,
    2. Tran L,
    3. Agwuncha R,
    4. et al
    . Associations between patient- and provider-level factors and telemedicine use in family medicine clinics. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:457–464.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Leung PB,
    2. Nahid M,
    3. Rusli M,
    4. et al
    . Factors associated with never having had a video visit. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:634–637.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hall A,
    2. Clemings K,
    3. Factora R,
    4. Meyyazhagan S
    . How telehealth addresses the needs of vulnerable elders. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:638–639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hall JD,
    2. Danna MN,
    3. Hoeft TJ,
    4. et al
    . Patient and clinician perspectives on two telemedicine approaches for treating patients with mental health disorders in underserved areas. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:465–474.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Anaya YB-M,
    2. Bañuelos Mota A,
    3. Hernandez GD,
    4. Osorio A,
    5. Hayes-Bautista DE
    . Post-pandemic telehealth policy for primary care: an equity perspective. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:588–592.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Haggerty T,
    2. Stephens HM,
    3. Peckens SA,
    4. et al
    . Telemedicine versus in-person primary care: impact on visit completion rate in a rural Appalachian population. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:475-484.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chavez A,
    2. Pullins C,
    3. Yennie J,
    4. Singh C,
    5. Kosiorek H
    . Association of telehealth with short-interval follow-up. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:485–490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schlegel D,
    2. Heron C,
    3. Berg A,
    4. Parascando J,
    5. Silvis M
    . Diagnoses per encounter by telephone, televideo, and in-office visits. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:491–496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mohan S,
    2. Lin W,
    3. Orozco FR,
    4. Robinson J,
    5. Mahoney A
    . Patient perceptions of video visits in a fee-for-service model. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:497–506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Segal JB,
    2. Dukhanin V,
    3. Davis S
    . Telemedicine in primary care: qualitative work towards a framework for appropriate use. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:507–516.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hall TL,
    2. Connelly L,
    3. Staton EW,
    4. et al
    . Points of concordance, points of discordance: a qualitative examination of telemedicine implementation. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:517–526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fraze TK,
    2. Beidler LB,
    3. De Marchis EH,
    4. Gottlieb LM,
    5. Potter MB
    . “Beyond just a supplement”: administrators' visions for the future of virtual primary care services. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:527–536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Segal JB,
    2. Dukhanin V,
    3. Davis S,
    4. et al
    . Working framework for appropriate use of virtual care in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:507–516.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Burdick TE,
    2. Moran DS,
    3. Oliver BJ,
    4. et al
    . Transitional care management quality improvement methods that reduced readmissions in a rural, primary care system. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:537–547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Stewart JL,
    2. Hatzigeorgiou C,
    3. Davis CL,
    4. Ledford CJW
    . DPPFit: developing and testing a technology-based adaptation of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) to address prediabetes in a primary care setting. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:548–558.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tuan W-J,
    2. Mellott M,
    3. Arndt BG,
    4. Jones J,
    5. Simpson AN
    . Disparities in use of patient portals among adults in family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:559–569.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Liddy C,
    2. Singh J,
    3. Mitchell R,
    4. Guglani S,
    5. Keely E
    . How one eConsult service is addressing emerging COVID-19 questions. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:601–604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lonergan-Cullum M,
    2. Hooker SA,
    3. Levy R,
    4. Ricco J
    . A new pandemic of loneliness. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:593–596.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Forgacs D,
    3. Shen YE,
    4. et al
    . High prevalence of both previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 and persistent symptoms. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:570–578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ofei-Dodoo S,
    2. Kellerman R,
    3. Russell T
    . Family physicians' perception of the new mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. J Am Board Fam Med Med 2021;34:898–906.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Loskutova NY,
    2. Callen EF,
    3. Westfall JM
    . Standardized patient assessments at the Medicare annual wellness visit: results from the AAFP National Research Network. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:605–609.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Young RA,
    2. Fulda KG,
    3. Espinoza A,
    4. et al
    . Ambulatory medication safety in primary care: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:610–628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Razon N,
    2. Wulf S,
    3. Perez C,
    4. et al
    . Family physicians' barriers and facilitators in incorporating medication abortion. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:579–587.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wang T,
    2. Amechi C,
    3. Anderson AA,
    4. Eden AR,
    5. Bazemore A
    . Variation in scope and area of practice by family physician race and ethnicity. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:454–456.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 35 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 3
May/June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The “Telehealth Divide”—Who Are the Underserved, and What Care Is Improved?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The “Telehealth Divide”—Who Are the Underserved, and What Care Is Improved?
Marjorie A. Bowman, Dean A. Seehusen, Christy J. W. Ledford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 451-453; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.220131

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The “Telehealth Divide”—Who Are the Underserved, and What Care Is Improved?
Marjorie A. Bowman, Dean A. Seehusen, Christy J. W. Ledford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 451-453; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.220131
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Telemedicine Visits and the Vulnerable/Underserved
    • Telehealth and Telemedicine Insights
    • COVID-19
    • This Issue's Potpourri
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Physicians Can/Should Do: What? Where? And How?
  • Clinically Useful Family Medicine Research
  • Mental Health of Patients and Clinicians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Show more Editors' Note

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire