Expanding Family Medicine Scholarship to All Faculty: The Minnesota Model for Harmonizing Clinical Care, Education, and Research Missions

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Martin JC,
   2. Avant RF,
   3. Bowman MA,
   4. et al

   . The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004; Suppl1:S3–32.
2. 2.↵
   1. Zerhouni EA

   . Translational and clinical science — Time for a new vision. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1621–3.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Scherger JE,
   2. Young HF

   . The AAFP research initiative. J Fam Pr 1998;46:203–4.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Bowman M,
   2. Lucan S,
   3. Rosenthal T,
   4. Mainous AI,
   5. James P

   . Family medicine research in the United States: from the late 1960's into the future. Fam Med 2018;49:289–95.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Ewigman B,
   2. Davis A,
   3. Vansaghi T,
   4. et al

   . Building research & scholarship capacity in departments of family medicine: A new joint ADFM-NAPCRG initiative. Ann Fam Med 2016;14:82–3.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. deGruy FV,
   2. Ewigman B,
   3. DeVoe JE,
   4. et al

   . A plan for useful and timely family medicine and primary care research. Fam Med 2015;47:636–42.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hester CM,
   2. Jiang V,
   3. Bartlett-Esquilant G,
   4. et al

   . Supporting family medicine research capacity: the critical role and current contributions of US family medicine organizations. Fam Med 2019;51:120–8.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Gotler RS

   . Unfinished business: the role of research in family medicine. Ann Fam Med 2019;17:70–6.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Peek CJ

   . The 5R's: An emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world. Fam Med 2019;51:103–11.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Liaw W,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Jiang V,
    4. et al

    . The scholarly output of faculty in family medicine departments. Fam Med 2019;51:103–11.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Eder M,
    2. Pierce J

    . Innovations in faculty development: study of a research assistance unit designed to assist clinician-educators with research. South Med J 2011;104:647–50.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Kempainen RR,
    2. Mckone EF,
    3. Rubenfeld GD,
    4. Scott CS,
    5. Tonelli MR

    . Publications and extramural activities of general internal medicine and medicine subspecialty clinician – educators: a multicenter study. 2005;80:238–43.
13. 13.↵
    1. Levinson W,
    2. Rubenstein A

    . Integrating clinician–educators into academic medical centers: challenges and potential solutions. Acad Med 2000;75:906–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Peek CJ,
    2. Windenburg D

    . Harmonized Transformation Across Care, Education, and Research: What does it really mean and is it possible? In: Workshop at 45th North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) Annual Meeting. Available from: https://www.napcrg.org/conferences/annualpastmeetingarchives/. Published 2017. Accessed July 15, 2021.
15. 15.↵
    1. Ranwala D,
    2. Alberg AJ,
    3. Brady KT,
    4. Obeid JS,
    5. Davis R,
    6. Halushka PV

    . Scientific retreats with ‘speed dating’: networking to stimulate new interdisciplinary translational research collaborations and team science. J Investig Med 2017;65:382–90.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Brandon C,
    2. Jamadar D,
    3. Girish G,
    4. Dong Q,
    5. Morag Y,
    6. Mullan P

    . Peer support of a faculty “writers' circle” increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship. Acad Radiol 2015;22:534–8.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Skarupski KA,
    2. Foucher KC

    . Writing Accountability Groups (WAGs): a tool to help junior faculty members build sustainable writing habits. J Fac Dev 2018;32:47–54.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Hekelman FP,
    2. Gilchrist V,
    3. Zyzanski SJ,
    4. Glover P,
    5. Olness K

    . An educational intervention to increase faculty publication productivity. Fam Med 1995;27:255–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Roth LM,
    2. Neale AV,
    3. Kennedy K,
    4. Dehaven MJ

    . Insights from practice-based researchers to develop family medicine faculty as scholars. Fac Dev 2007;39:504–9.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Buffington ALH,
    2. Lange C,
    3. Bakker C,
    4. et al

    . The Collaborative Scholarship Intensive: A research-intensive course to improve faculty scholarship. Fam Med. 2021; May;53(5):355–58.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Liaw W,
    2. Eden A,
    3. Coffman M,
    4. Nagaraj M,
    5. Bazemore AW

    . Factors associated with successful research departments: a qualitative analysis of family medicine research bright spots. Fam Med 2019;51:87–102.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Peek CJ

    . Mission and vision for the department of family medicine and community health, University of Minnesota Medical School. Intern Rep. 2012. Unpublished.
23. 23.↵
    1. Xierali IM,
    2. Nivet MA,
    3. Syed ZA,
    4. Shakil A,
    5. Schneider FD

    . Trends in tenure status in academic family medicine, 1977-2017: implications for recruitment, retention, and the academic mission. Acad Med 2020;95:241–7.

    OpenUrl
24. 24.↵
    1. Johnston SC

    . Academic medical centers: too large for their own health? JAMA 2019;322:203–4.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Boyer EL

    . Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1990. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
26. 26.↵
    Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. Available from: http://www.brimr.org/. Published February 9, 2021. Accessed April 23, 2021.