Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Colonization and Mortality Risk Among Community Adults Aged 40-85 ============================================================================================================= * Arch G. Mainous * Benjamin J. Rooks * Peter J. Carek ## Abstract *Introduction:* The objective of this study was to assess the 11-year mortality risk of methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA) colonization in community-dwelling adults aged 40 to 85 years. *Methods:* The study analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001 to 2004 linked to the National Death Index through December 31, 2015. Our cohort of community adults aged 40 to 85 years was 6085 participants (representing 118 718 486 adults). Mortality risk from MRSA colonization was examined with an 11-year follow-up. *Results:* The 11-year mortality rates were 35.9% (95% CI, 25.4%- 46.4%) for MRSA-colonized and 17.8% (95% CI, 16.4%- 19.2%) for non-colonized participants. After adjusting for potential confounders the hazard ratio for mortality among those colonized with MRSA was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.12-2.73). *Discussion:* MRSA colonization in middle-aged and older adults in the community is associated with a significantly increased mortality risk. Considering that this effect was in the community and not in hospitalized patients, this finding of increased mortality risk is especially troubling. * Cohort Studies * Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus * Mortality * NHANES * Population Health ## Introduction Methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA) infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1 Several cohort studies have examined MRSA colonization, not an infection, on downstream mortality risk with some focusing on hospitalized or nursing home patients and others focusing on community adults.2,3 These studies have yielded different findings with only some yielding an increased mortality risk.2⇓–4 One study using a national cohort of colonized community adults as young as 18 years found no significant effect, which was likely due to the low general mortality risk of young adults.3 The mortality risk of middle-aged and older community adults colonized with MRSA is currently unclear. ## Methods We analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001 to 2004 linked to the National Death Index through December 31, 2015. The NHANES uses a stratified multistage probability sample design to be representative of the United States (US) population. These are not patients but rather individuals in the community. This 2001 to 2004 baseline NHANES included 6270 participants aged 40 to 85 years. MRSA colonization was measured by nasal swabs plated on mannitol salt agar. Those that were *S. aureus* positive isolates were tested for resistance to oxacillin (MRSA). Individuals with missing MRSA colonization or mortality follow up information were excluded from the analysis, reducing the size of our analyzed cohort to 6085 participants. As a population-based cohort with a complex survey design and appropriate weighting a population estimate representative of the noninstitutionalized US population allows the sample to represent 118 718 486 adults. The mortality status for each participant was censored at 11 years to create consistency among follow-up lengths between members of the different NHANES cohorts. Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the 11-year mortality risk between MRSA colonized and non-colonized individuals. Cox regression analyses adjusted for the potential confounders of gender, race/ethnicity, health insurance, poverty-income ratio, hospitalization in the previous 12 months, and doctor diagnosis of heart disease, diabetes, and asthma in a forced inclusion model predicting mortality between MRSA colonized and non-colonized individuals. Cox proportional hazards models were also applied to assess the 11-year mortality risk of *S. aureus* colonization. All analyses were conducted using the survey package in R 3.6.3 to account for the complex NHANES sampling design and make population estimates. ## Results Table 1 shows the characteristics of the cohort. In the US population aged 40 to 85 years, 1.5% (95% CI,1.1%- 2.0%) were MRSA colonized. The 11-year mortality rate for *S. aureus* colonization was 16.7% (95% CI, 14.5% -18.9%) and 18.6% for those not colonized (95% CI, 16.8%- 20.3%). The 11-year mortality rates were 35.9% (95% CI, 25.4%-46.4%) for MRSA-colonized and 17.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-19.2%) for non-colonized participants. Table 2 indicates that *S. aureus* colonization was not associated with mortality in an unadjusted or adjusted analysis while MRSA colonization was associated with increased mortality risk in both unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses. View this table: [Table 1.](http://www.jabfm.org/content/34/2/439/T1) Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Cohort (N = 6085; Weighted N = 118, 718 486) View this table: [Table 2.](http://www.jabfm.org/content/34/2/439/T2) Table 2. All-Cause Mortality Hazard Ratios for Methicillin-Resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* Colonization a 11-Year Period ## Discussion MRSA colonization in middle-aged and older adults in the community is associated with a significantly increased mortality risk. *S. aureus* colonization is not associated with increased mortality, which is consistent with previous research.5 Although this cohort study is based on a nationally representative population estimate of community dwellers, there are some limitations. Limitations include the lack of an ability to determine the length of colonization or whether high-risk patients were likely re-colonizers. Second, the public use data in the National Death Index lists deaths into specified categories with no category for deaths associated with infectious disease. Our observation of increased mortality risk among MRSA colonized individuals invites further investigation into the risks of MRSA colonization. Considering that MRSA colonization among adults in the community was examined rather than MRSA infection in hospitalized patients, this finding of increased mortality risk is especially troubling. It is important to emphasize that current evidence is unclear whether MRSA decolonization of colonized individuals in the community would have a positive benefit in decreasing the mortality risk. ## Notes * This article was externally peer reviewed. * *Funding:* There was no external funding for this project. * *Conflict of interest:* None. * To see this article online, please go to: [http://jabfm.org/content/34/2/439.full](http://jabfm.org/content/34/2/439.full). * Received for publication July 27, 2020. * Revision received September 15, 2020. * Accepted for publication September 15, 2020. ## References 1. 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Available at: [https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf](https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf). Accessed July 15, 2020. 2. 2.Huang SS, Hinrichsen VL, Datta R, et al. Methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* infection and hospitalization in high-risk patients in the year following detection. PLoS One 2011;6:e24340. [CrossRef](http://www.jabfm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0024340&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.jabfm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21949707&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjabfp%2F34%2F2%2F439.atom) 3. 3.Mendy A, Vieira ER, Albatineh AN, Gasana J. *Staphylococcus aureus* colonization and long-term risk for death, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2016;22:1966–9. [CrossRef](http://www.jabfm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3201/eid2211.160220&link_type=DOI) 4. 4.Chan TC, Cheng VC, Hung IF, Chan FH, Ng WC, Yuen KY. The association between methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* colonization and mortality in Chinese nursing home older adults: a 2-year prospective cohort. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:796–7. 5. 5.Schweizer ML, Bossen A, McDanel JS, Dennis LK. *Staphylococcus aureus* colonization before infection is not associated with mortality among *S. aureus*-infected patients: a meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:796–802. [CrossRef](http://www.jabfm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1086/666628&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.jabfm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22759547&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fjabfp%2F34%2F2%2F439.atom)