Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Article CommentaryCommentary

The Dilution of Family Medicine: Waning Numbers of Family Physicians Providing Pediatric Care

Tanya E. Anim
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2020, 33 (6) 828-829; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200544
Tanya E. Anim
the FSU College of Medicine Family Medicine Residency Program at Lee Health, Fort Myers, FL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Family medicine was founded as a specialty in 1969 and pediatric training was an integral part of our training since its inception.1

Family physicians continue to comprise the largest percentage of those who identify themselves as primary care physicians in the country. In 2017, 39.5% of the primary care physician workforce were family physicians, 21.3% were pediatricians, and 34.5% were general internal medicine physicians.2 This trend is unlikely to change given that 87.1% of family medicine physicians go on to practice primary care (full scope or not) compared with 12.4% of internal medicine physicians, and 36.5% of pediatricians.3

Over the years, despite the increased quality of education family physicians receive in training, more and more are narrowing their scope of practice.4 This is a clear concern as highlighted by the article by Eden et al,5 which demonstrates the continued decline of family physicians caring for pediatric patients. What has led to this change is not entirely clear, but several theories exist. One thought is that as family physicians move from (or are forced out of) maternity care, this has led to dwindling numbers of children who are delivered into our practices. As family physicians we are uniquely qualified to care for the mother, newborn, and indeed the entire family. Moms who are no longer seeing family physicians for their prenatal care are unaware that we can provide care for their newborns. Rather, they are encouraged by their materniry care provider to find their child a “pediatrician.” Although the attrition of family physicians providing maternity care has not been definitively proven in the literature to be a cause of the decline of us providing pediatric care6, it may be beneficial for our obstetrician and midwife colleagues to recommend that parents find a pediatrician or talk to their family physician about caring for their newborn. Providing patient education and “preparing for parenthood” literature reflecting this more inclusive language would also be a welcome change.

Another theory, which is linked, but distinctly different is the consideration that as less pediatric patients are seen in our practices and our training sites, residents are graduating with less comfort practicing pediatrics upon graduation. They therefore choose practices that exclude pediatrics or limit the age range of their pediatric patients, electing to see older children only.7 In one study, residents described that they needed more pediatric exposure to practice pediatrics in their practice going forward, despite being adequately trained as demonstrated by performance on examinations.8 As fewer family physicians see younger children, this potentially perpetuates the view of the public that family physician do not or should not care for young children. In addition, there are fewer examples for medical students to see family physicians practicing full-scope family medicine, which may lead to less medical students choosing family medicine. Some may instead elect to choose a career in either pediatrics or internal medicine where they may feel they have more options—to either stay generalists in their fields, or have the option to subspecialize later if they so choose. Some may also choose pediatrics and internal medicine combined residency programs, rather than family medicine for that same reason.

Legislative and cost issues are certainly a consideration as contributory factors for the decline, as well. Many practices choose not to care for children due to the low reimbursement rates for caring for pediatric patents, a great proportion of which are on Medicaid, which has been a longstanding issue.9

Accepting pediatric Medicaid patients may also be cost prohibitive for many family physicians due to the need to carry vaccines, which is a significant portion of the reason for pediatric clinic visits. The reimbursement rates for the vaccines and the administration of those vaccines, coupled with a lack of adequate pediatric volume to substantiate the cost, is a deterrent to stocking vaccines10 for many family medicine practices. Without providing this crucial service, parents are more apt to take their children to practices already with a higher volume of pediatric care. Some may link this issue to the low salary family physicians receive relative to other specialties and the high cost of medical education, but this has not panned out in some studies as a major factor.11

The primary care specialties ought to work together to create a shared vision to address the needs of the primary care workforce, including the need for family physicians to continue to provide pediatric care. The challenge presently is that such cooperation may threaten a loss of identity of each specialty.3 I personally, am concerned that a continued decline in our scope of care may lead to our specialty appearing to be simply outpatient internal medicine—lacking our distinct focus on broad spectrum, comprehensive care for all ages. Of particular concern is the effect this continued trend will have on rural communities, which may lack pediatricians7 leaving many children without adequate care if not cared for by family physicians.

An in-depth look at how to fix these issues is beyond the scope of this commentary. But from personal experience I can tell you that what I do know is that continuing to practice the full scope of the profession is extremely satisfying. In fact, maintaining a broad scope of practice is associated with greater job satisfaction among family physicians and decreases burnout.12 As a family medicine educator, I sincerely hope that we strive to continue to keep pediatric care a central and significant portionof our training. I also hope that we continue to serve in areas where we are needed most, for the most vulnerable populations.

Notes

  • See Related Article on Page 830.

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • Funding: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/33/6/828.full.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Carek PJ,
    2. Anim T,
    3. Conry C,
    4. et al
    . Residency training in family medicine: a history of innovation and program support. Fam Med 2017;49:275–81.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Petterson SM,
    2. Klink K,
    3. Meyers D,
    4. Bazemore A
    . The state of primary care in the United States: a chartbook of facts and statistics. 2018. Available from: https://www.graham-center.org/content/dam/rgc/documents/publications-reports/reports/PrimaryCareChartbook.pdf.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Carney PA,
    2. Thayer EK,
    3. Green LA,
    4. et al
    . Conditions influencing collaboration among the primary care disciplines as they prepare the future primary care physician workforce. Fam Med 2020;52:398–407.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Weidner AKH,
    2. Chen FM
    . Changes in preparation and practice patterns among new family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2019;01:46–8.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Eden AR,
    2. Morgan ZJ,
    3. Jetty A,
    4. Peterson LE
    . Proportion of family physicians caring for children is declining. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:830–831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cohen D,
    2. Coco A
    . Trends in well-child visits to family physicians by children younger than 2 years of age. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:245–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wasserman RC,
    2. Varni SE,
    3. Hollander MC,
    4. Harder VS
    . Change in site of children's primary care: a longitudinal population-based analysis. Ann Fam Med 2019;09:390–5.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Page C,
    2. Carlough MC,
    3. Lam Y,
    4. Steiner J
    . Reinvigorating pediatric care in an academic family medicine practice. Fam Med Feb 2014;46:120–3.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Perloff JD,
    2. Kletke P,
    3. Fossett JW
    . Which physicians limit their Medicaid participation, and why. Health Serv Res 1995;30:7–26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Campos-Outcalt D,
    2. Jeffcott-Pera M,
    3. Carter-Smith P,
    4. Schoof BK,
    5. Young HF
    . Vaccines provided by family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:507–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Alavi M,
    2. Ho T,
    3. Stisher C,
    4. et al
    . Factors that influence student choice in family medicine—A national focus group. Fam Med 2019;02:143–8.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Weidner AKH,
    2. Phillips RL,
    3. Fang B,
    4. Peterson LE
    . Burnout and scope of practice in new family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2018;05:200–5.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 6
November-December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Dilution of Family Medicine: Waning Numbers of Family Physicians Providing Pediatric Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Dilution of Family Medicine: Waning Numbers of Family Physicians Providing Pediatric Care
Tanya E. Anim
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2020, 33 (6) 828-829; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200544

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Dilution of Family Medicine: Waning Numbers of Family Physicians Providing Pediatric Care
Tanya E. Anim
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2020, 33 (6) 828-829; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200544
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Proportion of Family Physicians Caring for Children is Declining
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The FDA Initiative to Assure Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Clinical Trials
  • Diversifying the Federal Family Medicine Physician Workforce
  • The ACGME’s New Paid Family and Medical Leave Policy: Just the Beginning
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire