Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

When Physicians Say No: Predictors of Request Denial and Subsequent Patient Satisfaction

Elizabeth M. Magnan, Peter Franks, Anthony Jerant, Richard L. Kravitz and Joshua J. Fenton
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2020, 33 (1) 51-58; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190202
Elizabeth M. Magnan
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine (EMM, PF, AJ, JJF), the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research (EMM, PF, AJ, RLK, JJF), and the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (RLK), University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Franks
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine (EMM, PF, AJ, JJF), the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research (EMM, PF, AJ, RLK, JJF), and the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (RLK), University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Jerant
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine (EMM, PF, AJ, JJF), the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research (EMM, PF, AJ, RLK, JJF), and the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (RLK), University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Kravitz
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine (EMM, PF, AJ, JJF), the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research (EMM, PF, AJ, RLK, JJF), and the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (RLK), University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua J. Fenton
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine (EMM, PF, AJ, JJF), the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research (EMM, PF, AJ, RLK, JJF), and the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (RLK), University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient Characteristics by Whether a Request was Denied for Visits with a Patient Request (n = 867 Visits)

    All Visits with One or More RequestsPatients Who Did Not Report a DenialPatients Who Reported One or More DenialsP-Value
    n867685182
    Age, mean (SD)46.4 (15.8)46.7 (16.0)45.2 (14.8).25
    Male gender267 (30.8%)215 (31.4%)52 (28.6%).46
    Race/ethnicity
        White399 (46.0%)312 (45.5%)87 (47.8%).74
        Hispanic208 (24.0%)164 (23.9%)44 (24.2%)
        Black104 (12.0%)86 (12.6%)18 (9.9%)
        Asian53 (6.1%)39 (5.7%)14 (7.7%)
        Other/multiple races75 (8.7%)60 (8.9%)15 (8.2%)
        Decline to state28 (3.2%)24 (3.5%)4 (2.2%)
    Education level
        HS/GED or less170 (19.6%)134 (19.6%)36 (19.7%).33
        Some college315 (36.3%)249 (36.4%)66 (36.3%)
        College grad184 (21.2%)137 (20.0%)47 (25.8%)
        >College198 (22.8%)165 (24.1%)33 (18.1%)
    Marital status
        Married or domestic partnership361 (41.6%)287 (41.9%)74 (40.7%).40
        Divorced125 (14.4%)98 (14.3%)27 (14.8%)
        Unmarried couple86 (9.9%)75 (10.9%)11 (6.0%)
        Never married207 (23.9%)158 (23.1%)49 (26.9%)
        Separated30 (3.5%)22 (3.2%)8 (4.4%)
        Widowed58 (6.7%)45 (6.6%)13 (7.7%)
    Saw usual physician (self-reported)442 (51.0%)365 (53.3%)77 (42.3%).008
    Patient saw faculty physician211 (24.3%)176 (25.7%)35 (19.2%).07
    Self-reported physical health good or better663 (76.5%)534 (78.0%)129 (70.9%).04
    Mental Health index, mean (SD)72.5 (19.0)73.2 (18.9)69.9 (56.0, 84.0).04
    Symptom burden
        Low240 (27.7%)203 (29.6%)37 (20.3%)<.001
        Mid222 (25.6%)192 (28.0%)30 (16.5%)
        High405 (46.7%)290 (42.3%)115 (63.2%)
    Medical skepticism, mean (SD)3.0 (0.66)3.0 (0.65)3.1 (0.70).06
    Life satisfaction, mean (SD)25.1 (6.50)25.1 (6.5)25.1 (6.3).99
    • SD, standard deviations; HS/GED, High School/General Educational Development.

    • Saw usual doctor: patient answered on survey that they saw the usual doctor they see for medical care (patient self-report of usual doctor).

    • Mental Health index: higher is better self-reported mental health (range, 4 to 100).

    • Symptom burden: higher is great symptom burden.

    • Medical skepticism: higher value is more skeptical (range, 1 to 5).

    • Life satisfaction: higher value is more satisfied (range, 5 to 35).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Predictors of Physician Denial of One or More Patient Requests Among All Visits with a Request (n = 867)

    Patients Who Reported ≥1 Requests Denied
    aOR (95% CI)P-Value
    Age1.00 (0.99, 1.01).92
    Male gender (female = reference)1.00 (0.68, 1.49).99
    Race/ethnicity
        Whitereference
        Hispanic0.74 (0.47, 1.18).21
        Black0.64 (0.35, 1.17).15
        Asian1.37 (0.67, 2.81).38
        Other/multiple races0.74 (0.38, 1.49).38
        Decline to state0.59 (0.19, 1.83).36
    Education level
        HS/GED or lessreference
        Some college1.12 (0.68, 1.82).66
        College grad1.38 (0.80, 2.37).25
        >College0.74 (0.41, 1.32).30
    Marital status
        Married or partnershipreference
        Divorced0.93 (0.54, 1.60).80
        Member of unmarried couple0.44 (0.19, 1.02).06
        Never married0.99 (0.53, 1.87).99
        Separated1.33 (0.50, 3.54).56
        Widowed1.23 (0.55, 2.77).61
    Saw usual physician (self-reported)0.61 (0.42, 0.88).009
    Patient saw faculty physician0.72 (0.44, 1.16).18
    Self-reported physical health good or better0.75 (0.48, 1.17).21
    Mental Health index0.99 (0.98, 1.00).18
    Symptom burden
        Lowreference
        Mid0.84 (0.49, 1.44).53
        High2.21 (1.38, 3.55).001
    Medical skepticism1.35 (1.03, 1.78).03
    Life satisfaction1.03 (0.99, 1.07).06
    • aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HS/GED, High School/General Educational Development.

    • Saw usual doctor: patient answered on survey that they saw the usual doctor they see for medical care (patient self-report of usual doctor).

    • Mental Health index: higher is better self-reported mental health (range, 4 to 100).

    • Symptom Burden: higher is great symptom burden.

    • Medical Skepticism: higher value is more skeptical (range, 1 to 5).

    • Life Satisfaction: higher value is more satisfied (range, 5 to 35).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Predictors of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients who Had at Least one Request Denied During the Visit (n = 182)

    Adjusted Change in Percentile Rank in Visit Satisfaction (95% CI)P-Value
    Age (per year)0.2 (−0.1, 0.6).14
    Male gender (female = reference)2.1 (−6.8, 10.9).65
    Race/ethnicity
        Whitereference
        Hispanic0.1 (−9.8, 10.0).98
        Black−0.6 (−14.4, 13.1).93
        Asian5.2 (−9.8, 20.3).50
        Other/multiple races3.1 (−11.3, 17.5).67
        Decline to state−19.1 (−46.4, −8.1).17
    Education level
        HS/GED or lessreference
        Some college−1.5 (−12.4, 9.3).78
        College grad−9.7 (−21.8, 2.5).12
        >College−15.4 (−29.2, −1.7).028
    Marital status
        Married or partnership (reference)reference
        Divorced8.6 (−20.3, 3.2).16
        Member of unmarried couple−16.8 (−36.1, 2.5).09
        Never married0.6 (−12.7, 13.8).93
        Separated−15.6 (−37.0, 5.9).16
        Widowed−8.0 (−26.4, 10.4).40
    Saw usual physician (self-reported)12.4 (3.5, 21.2).006
    Patient saw faculty physician11.7 (0.7, 22.7).036
    Self-reported physical health good or better3.8 (−6.5, 14.1).45
    Mental Health index (per point increase)0.1 (−0.1, 0.3).43
    Symptom burden
        Low (reference)reference
        Mid−1.8 (−14.4, 10.9).78
        High1.4 (−9.5, 12.4).80
    Medical skepticism (per point increase)−6.9 (−12.7, −1.1).02
    Life satisfaction (per point increase)1.0 (0.2, 1.8).03
    • CI, confidence interval; HS/GED, High School/General Educational Development.

    • Saw usual doctor: patient answered on survey that they saw the usual doctor they see for medical care (patient self-report of usual doctor).

    • Mental Health index: higher is better self-reported mental health (range, 4 to 100).

    • Symptom Burden: higher is great symptom burden.

    • Medical Skepticism: higher value is more skeptical (range, 1 to 5).

    • Life Satisfaction: higher value is more satisfied (range, 5 to 35).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 1
January-February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
When Physicians Say No: Predictors of Request Denial and Subsequent Patient Satisfaction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
When Physicians Say No: Predictors of Request Denial and Subsequent Patient Satisfaction
Elizabeth M. Magnan, Peter Franks, Anthony Jerant, Richard L. Kravitz, Joshua J. Fenton
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2020, 33 (1) 51-58; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190202

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
When Physicians Say No: Predictors of Request Denial and Subsequent Patient Satisfaction
Elizabeth M. Magnan, Peter Franks, Anthony Jerant, Richard L. Kravitz, Joshua J. Fenton
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2020, 33 (1) 51-58; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190202
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family Medicine and the "New" Opioid Epidemic
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Is the Availability of Immediate Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Associated with a Decrease in Rapid Repeat Pregnancy?
  • Menstrual Equity: A Survey Study with ZIP-Code Level Analysis
  • Comparison of the Performance of Three Health Related Social Needs Screening Tools
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Outpatients
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Regression Analysis
  • Self Report

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2026 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire