Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Clinician Experiences with Screening for Social Needs in Primary Care

Sebastian T. Tong, Winston R. Liaw, Paulette Lail Kashiri, James Pecsok, Julia Rozman, Andrew W. Bazemore and Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2018, 31 (3) 351-363; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170419
Sebastian T. Tong
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Winston R. Liaw
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paulette Lail Kashiri
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Pecsok
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Rozman
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew W. Bazemore
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex H. Krist
From Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (STT, PLK, JP, JR, AWB, AHK); The Robert Graham Center, Washington D.C. (WRL, AWB), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (WRL).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient Responses to Social Needs Survey (n = 123)

    DomainDescriptor of Positive ScreenPercentage with Positive ScreenPercentage Asking for Help
    Physical activityLess than 150 minutes of strenuous exercise per week53.01.6
    DentalLast dental appointment ≥1 year ago25.21.6
    Alcohol useAUDIT-C* score ≥3 in women or ≥4 in men14.60.8
    Overall healthSelf-rated health as “fair” or “poor”†13.00.0
    Tobacco useCurrent use of cigarettes12.20.8
    FinancesLack of medical insurance, concern for losing medical insurance, or problems paying for medications, clinic visits or supplies11.40.0
    WorkCurrently unemployed, receiving disability, or other government assistance11.40.0
    LearningProblems with understanding, remembering, seeing, hearing, and English literacy10.60.8
    Mental healthPHQ-2‡ score ≥310.60.8
    FoodInsufficient food and lack of money to buy more7.31.6
    DrugsAny use of illicit drugs or prescription drugs for nonmedical purposes7.30.0
    TransportationProblems with access to transportation4.90.8
    HousingCurrently homeless or living in shelter; currently at risk of losing housing; or concern that will lose housing in next 6 months4.10.8
    EducationDid not complete high school2.41.6
    SafetyFeeling unsafe in neighborhood or concern that spouse/partner might hurt them2.42.4
    Social connectionsLimited interaction with family, friends, and neighbors1.60.8
    Overall with at least one domain86.23.3
    Overall with at least one domain with physical activity excluded70.73.3
    • Note: see Appendix A for full social needs survey.

    • ↵* AUDIT-C is a 3-item validated alcohol screening tool that helps identify persons with hazardous drinking or active alcohol use disorders.

    • ↵† options for health ranking including Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor.

    • ↵‡ PHQ-2, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2, is a validated depression screening tool, which inquires about frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past 2 weeks.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Clinician Diary Responses About Using the Social Needs Survey (n = 123)

    Positive Response (%)Neutral (%)Negative Response (%)
    Information from social needs survey helped during encounter33.964.41.7
    Knowing patient lives in “cold spot” helped during the encounter33.363.33.3
    Social needs survey helped change care*22.5N/A77.5
    Social needs survey helped me know patient better52.540.86.7
    • Note: see Appendix B for clinician diary response prompts.

    • ↵* for this question, clinicians were not given a neutral response option.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Themes from Clinician Perspectives Identified in Learning Collaboratives and Clinician Diaries

    ThemesFindingsExample Quotations
    The act of assessing social needs is difficult and resource intensiveScreening is less beneficial for patients that you know well“Some of the folks I have known for 20 plus years, so there wasn't a lot that could surprise me.”
    Patients may be hesitant to share needs“The patient was very reluctant to complete the survey. He did not report any social needs for any topic and did not ask for help with any topics. However, I actually suspect that the patient has a number of social needs. Talking about the responses made me think he had a number of needs but was embarrassed to mention them.”
    “I think there's a lot of pride too. Like I had one patient that looked at the survey and he figured out pretty quick what it was and then he just didn't want to do it.”
    Patients who need help do not come in for visits“It's important to mention that the people who really need it may not be the ones who are actually coming in.”
    The information is overwhelming for physicians“And I think it does get a bit overwhelming to think about having that burden. I mean as a family practitioner, we already do so much in terms of looking at the whole person, but it just adds another dimension but I don't know how well, right now, we are equipped to deal with.”
    “We're doing too many things. We have too much to do. We have too little time.”
    Few resources exist to help patients with social needsProviders want to address social needs but lack agency with respect to addressing social needs“Our resources as a practice are limited because we can't be paying for rides for patients. We can't be, you know, doing some of these things. So really we have to think about what we really want to accomplish with this.”
    Clinicians are not aware of community resources“One problem is we don't know what resources are even in our community, most of us.”
    “There's so much that's out there that I never stumble upon until like I have one patient who has this one resource that I end up using. It would be helpful just to know what all is there, you know?”
    Practices lack adequate support to address social needs“It doesn't do you much good in a system to identify issues or problems if the system doesn't have any way to address them.”
    Screening for social needs did not seem to help with social service delivery, but it did help clinicians to know their patients and seems to change clinician-patient interactionsMay change how clinician interacts with patient“The patient had a new diagnosis of diabetes and told me she did not go to the diabetes education classes because they were $250 per class. With the survey, my reaction was more understanding and I was less inclined to assume she did not care about her health.”
    “[My patient] had a mammogram ordered from wellness visit last year but never had it done. Knowing she was from a resource poor area, I took extra time asking her about barriers that would prohibit her from getting this done this year.”
    May increase clinician awareness“It's a reminder that our patients, in filling out these surveys and learning more about them, that our patients have lives outside of just the medicine that we give them.”
    May not change practice“I don't think that other than maybe a little bit of insight making me think about those community factors more than I would if I hadn't had the survey to look at […] I haven't changed anything.”
    Screening for social needs can cause harms“Does it make a difference that I'm actually surveying these people? Am I doing this for naught? And I guess that would be another…what's the outcome going to do? Because I always want to do good. I took an oath to do no harm.”
    More evidence is needed about how to collect social needs, how to help address social needs, and the impact on healthSome clinicians questioned if health care system is the right place to address social needs“For at least social needs, I would think the doctor is a small little isolated part that could be addressed by a bigger system […] it seems like there's probably a better structure to gather the data to identify what the needs are and to actually address the needs that is probably not the doctor's office.”
    “We're not asking the right questions. It makes me think well, gosh, what would be the right questions to ask to identify things that the doctor might be able to help with.”
    More evidence is needed about whether addressing social needs improves health outcomes“I think the bottom line is: Does it improve social or health outcome? I mean that's what we want to know the answer to. Is investing your time and doing these things, does it pay off? Does it actually help the patient? It would be nice to see data that shows that it does.”
    Clinicians have ideas about how to address social needs better“Maybe a print-out of the basic resources in there that we could just easily pick up.”
    “What about group sessions that we would hold here for people with similar county, in the same county, and similar issues and we could talk to them all at one time? I mean some people may be embarrassed by this but then also they could support each other.”
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 31 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 31, Issue 3
May-June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinician Experiences with Screening for Social Needs in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinician Experiences with Screening for Social Needs in Primary Care
Sebastian T. Tong, Winston R. Liaw, Paulette Lail Kashiri, James Pecsok, Julia Rozman, Andrew W. Bazemore, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2018, 31 (3) 351-363; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170419

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinician Experiences with Screening for Social Needs in Primary Care
Sebastian T. Tong, Winston R. Liaw, Paulette Lail Kashiri, James Pecsok, Julia Rozman, Andrew W. Bazemore, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2018, 31 (3) 351-363; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170419
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix A: Social Needs Survey
    • Appendix B: Postencounter Clinician Diary Entry Questions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Information Technology in Screening and Identifying Unmet Social Needs: A Scoping Review
  • Assessing Patient Readiness for Hospital Discharge, Discharge Communication, and Transitional Care Management
  • Associations Between Patient/Caregiver Trust in Clinicians and Experiences of Healthcare-Based Discrimination
  • Integration of social determinants of health information within the primary care electronic health record: a systematic review of patient perspectives and experiences
  • Family Medicine Team Perspectives on Screening for Health-Related Social Needs
  • Screening for Poverty And Related Social determinants to improve Knowledge of and links to resources (SPARK): development and cognitive testing of a tool for primary care
  • Patient-Reported Social Risks and Clinician Decision Making: Results of a Clinician Survey in Primary Care Community Health Centers
  • Primary care physicians perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study
  • Emergence of Gun Violence as a Patient Priority
  • Better Together: A Descriptive Analysis of a Medical-Legal Partnership in Western North Carolina
  • Emergence of Gun Violence as a Patient Priority
  • Mise en {oelig}uvre dinterventions sociales en soins de sante primaires
  • Implementing social interventions in primary care
  • Addressing Social Determinants While Social Distancing: The Development of an Evidence-Based Social Needs Screening for a Telehealth Setting
  • Patient Interest in Receiving Assistance with Self-Reported Social Risks
  • Provider Impacts of Socioeconomic Risk Screening and Referral Programs: A Scoping Review
  • La prescription sociale: Appel a laction
  • Social prescribing: A call to action
  • If social determinants of health are so important, shouldnt we ask patients about them?
  • Integrating Community and Clinical Data to Assess Patient Risks with A Population Health Assessment Engine (PHATE)
  • When and How Do We Need Permission to Help Patients Address Social Risk?
  • Do Patients Want Help Addressing Social Risks?
  • Capacity to Address Social Needs Affects Primary Care Clinician Burnout
  • Utilizing PHATE: A Population Health-Mapping Tool to Identify Areas of Food Insecurity
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles of 2018
  • Geographic Characteristics of Loneliness in Primary Care
  • Advancing the Science of Implementation in Primary Health Care
  • Living in "Cold Spot" Communities Is Associated with Poor Health and Health Quality
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Needs Assessment
  • Primary Health Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Virginia

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire