The Diagnostic Value of the Patient’s Reason for Encounter for Diagnosing Cancer in Primary Care

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lamberts H,
   2. Oskam SK,
   3. Okkes IM

   . The clinical relationship between symptoms and the final diagnosis in general practice, determined by means of posterior probabilities calculated on the basis of the Transition Project. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 2005;149:2566–72.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Hamilton W

   . Cancer diagnosis in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:121–128.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Mulka O

   . NICE suspected cancer guidelines. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:580–581.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Lyratzopoulos G,
   2. Wardle J,
   3. Rubin G

   . Rethinking diagnostic delay in cancer: How difficult is the diagnosis? BMJ 2014;349:g7400.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Jones R,
   2. Rubin G,
   3. Hungin P

   . Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? BMJ 2001;322:1555–1556.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Ford AC,
   2. Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ,
   3. Rodgers CC,
   4. et al

   . Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2008;57:1545–1553.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Astin M,
   2. Griffin T,
   3. Neal RD,
   4. et al

   . The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61(586):e231–e243.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   Kanker.nl. Symptomen van kanker. Available from: https://www.kanker.nl/bibliotheek/artikelen/794-symptomen-van-kanker. Accessed June 29, 2015.
9. 9.↵
   Cancer Research UK. Key signs and symptoms of cancer. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-symptoms, Accessed June 29, 2015.
10. 10.↵
    1. Bentzen N

    . Family medicine research: implications for Wonca. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(Suppl 2):S45–S49.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Jones R,
    2. Latinovic R,
    3. Charlton J,
    4. Gulliford MC

    . Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: Cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2007;334:1040.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Okkes IM,
    2. Oskam SK,
    3. Lamberts H

    1. Okkes I,
    2. Oskam S,
    3. Van Boven K,
    4. et al

    . EFP. Episodes of care in Dutch Family Practice. Epidemiological data based on the routine use of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) in the Transition Project of the Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam (1985–2003). In: Okkes IM, Oskam SK, Lamberts H. ICPC in the Amsterdam Transition Project. CD-Rom Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Department of Family Medicine, 2005.
13. 13.↵
    1. Van Weel C

    . The Continuous Morbidity Registration Nijmegen: Background and history of a Dutch general practice database. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14(Suppl 1):5–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lamberts H,
    2. Hofmans-Okkes I

    . Episode of care: A core concept in family practice. J Fam Pract 1996;42:161–167.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    WONCA International Classification Committee. International Classification for Primary Care, Second Edition (ICPC-2). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.
16. 16.↵
    1. van der Linden MW,
    2. Westert GP,
    3. Bakker de D,
    4. et al

    . Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: klachten en aandoeningen in de bevolking en in de huisartspraktijk. Utrecht, The Netherlands: NIVEL, 2004.
17. 17.↵
    1. Barton MB,
    2. Elmore JG,
    3. Fletcher SW

    . Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: Frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:651–657.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Parker C,
    2. Hippisley-Cox J,
    3. Coupland C,
    4. et al

    . Rectal and postmenopausal bleeding: Consultation and referral of patients with and without severe mental health problems. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:371–376.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Soler JK,
    2. Okkes I,
    3. Oskam S,
    4. et al

    . An international comparative family medicine study of the Transition Project data from the Netherlands, Malta and Serbia. Is family medicine an international discipline? Comparing incidence and prevalence rates of reasons for encounter and diagnostic titles of episodes of care across populations. Fam Pract 2012;29:283–298.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Banks J,
    2. Hollinghurst S,
    3. Bigwood L,
    4. et al

    . Preferences for cancer investigation: A vignette-based study of primary-care attendees. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:232–240.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science