Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Prioritization of Patients for Comprehensive Medication Review By a Clinical Pharmacist in Family Medicine

Joseph P. Vande Griend, Joseph J. Saseen, Debra Bislip, Caroline Emsermann, Colleen Conry and Wilson D. Pace
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2015, 28 (3) 418-424; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140303
Joseph P. Vande Griend
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora (JPVG, JJS), and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (JPVG, JJS, DB, CE, CC, WDP).
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph J. Saseen
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora (JPVG, JJS), and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (JPVG, JJS, DB, CE, CC, WDP).
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Bislip
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora (JPVG, JJS), and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (JPVG, JJS, DB, CE, CC, WDP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Emsermann
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora (JPVG, JJS), and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (JPVG, JJS, DB, CE, CC, WDP).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colleen Conry
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora (JPVG, JJS), and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (JPVG, JJS, DB, CE, CC, WDP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson D. Pace
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora (JPVG, JJS), and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (JPVG, JJS, DB, CE, CC, WDP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. The Clinical Pharmacy Priority (CP2) Score Algorithm
    CriteriaScore
    Age (years)
        <651
        65–752
        >753
    Diagnosis (code)
        Diabetes mellitus (250.X)2
        Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (491.X, 492.X, 496.X)1
        Hypertension (401.X to 405.X inclusive)2
        Cardiovascular disease (410.X-414.X inclusive, 429.2, 434.0, 434.00, 434.01,435.8, 435.9, 436, 437.0, 437, 434.9x, 435, 437.1, 440.0, 441.3, 443, 440.8, 440.9, 441.4, 443.89, 443.9)2
        Heart failure (428.X)1
        Depression (311.x, 296.2x, 296.3x)1
    Estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min1
    Hemoglobin A1c
        >7.9%1
        >8.9%2
    BP
        Last BP >140/90 mmHg and last 3 averaged >140/90 mmHg1
        Last BP >160/100 mmHg and last 3 average >160/100 mmHg2
    Active items on medication list
        <30
        3–51
        6–92
        >94
    • BP, blood pressure.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Clinical Pharmacy Priority (CP2) Scoring Criteria Among Those Receiving and Not Receiving a Medication Recommendation
    Recommendation (n = 101)No Recommendation (n = 1006)P Value
    Age (years)<.0001
        <6540.6%76.8%
        65–7538.6%17.4%
        >7520.8%5.8%
    Diagnosis
        COPD7.9%3.6%.0332
        Diabetes48.5%6.4%<.0001
        Hypertension84.2%27.1%<.0001
        Vascular disease26.7%5.4%<.0001
        Heart failure5%1%.001
        Depression22.8%14.7%.0326
    eGFR <45 mL/min9.9%2.5%<.0001
    Hemoglobin A1c >7.9%11.9%0.9%<.0001
    Stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension*19.8%5.6%<.0001
    Items on medication list<.0001
        <32%34.2%
        3–59.9%25.7%
        6–925.7%21%
        ≥961.4%19.1%
    • ↵* Stage 1 hypertension = blood pressure 140–159/90–99 mmHg; stage 2 hypertension = blood pressure ≥160/100 mmHg.

    • COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Clinical Pharmacy Priority (CP2) Score Levels and Medication Recommendation Rate
    CP2 ScorePatient Appointments (n)Medication Recommendation Rate (%)
    Level 1
        02900
        11780.6
        21200.8
    Level 2
        3734.1
        4918.8
        5759.3
        65819
        76113.1
    Level 3
        85628.6
        94537.8
        101838.9
    Level 4
        111553.3
        121457.1
        13825
        14366.7
        152100
    • View popup
    Table 4. Drug Therapy Problems Identified and the Most Common Medication Recommendations (n = 223)
    Drug Therapy Problem (n)Most Common Medication Recommendation (n)
    Needs additional therapy (118)Vaccine (62)
    HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (31)
    Blood pressure–lowering agent (6)
    Antidiabetic agent (4)
    Unnecessary drug (31)ER niacin or ezetimibe not needed (10)
    Triglyceride lowering not needed (7)
    Wrong dose (24)Blood pressure drug dose too high/low (17)
    Diabetes drug dose too high/low (3)
    Cost (13)Brand switched to different generic (8)
    Potentially inappropriate drug (10)Unsafe in patient ≥65 years old (10)
    Duplicate therapy (7)Aspirin/clopidogrel when not indicated (2)
    Laboratory test needed (6)Vitamin D (2)
    Wrong drug (5)Five different drugs identified (5)
    Adverse drug reaction (4)Four different reactions identified (4)
    Drug interaction (4)Simvastatin interaction (4)
    Other (1)Nonadherence (1)
    • ER, extended release.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue 3
May-June 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prioritization of Patients for Comprehensive Medication Review By a Clinical Pharmacist in Family Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prioritization of Patients for Comprehensive Medication Review By a Clinical Pharmacist in Family Medicine
Joseph P. Vande Griend, Joseph J. Saseen, Debra Bislip, Caroline Emsermann, Colleen Conry, Wilson D. Pace
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2015, 28 (3) 418-424; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140303

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prioritization of Patients for Comprehensive Medication Review By a Clinical Pharmacist in Family Medicine
Joseph P. Vande Griend, Joseph J. Saseen, Debra Bislip, Caroline Emsermann, Colleen Conry, Wilson D. Pace
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2015, 28 (3) 418-424; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140303
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Initial study of clinical pharmacy work prioritization tools
  • Implementation of a prioritized scoring tool to improve time to pharmacist intervention
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Family Practice
  • Health Care Rationing
  • Medication Therapy Management

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire