Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
  • Log out
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Brief ReportPolicy Brief

Fewer Family Physicians Are in Solo Practices

Lars E. Peterson, Elizabeth Baxley, Carlos Roberto Jaén and Robert L. Phillips
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2015, 28 (1) 11-12; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140217
Lars E. Peterson
the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky (LEP, RLP); the Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (EB); the Departments of Family & Community Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio (CRJ); and the Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH) Center, San Antonio, TX (CRJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Baxley
the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky (LEP, RLP); the Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (EB); the Departments of Family & Community Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio (CRJ); and the Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH) Center, San Antonio, TX (CRJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Roberto Jaén
the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky (LEP, RLP); the Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (EB); the Departments of Family & Community Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio (CRJ); and the Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH) Center, San Antonio, TX (CRJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Phillips
the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky (LEP, RLP); the Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (EB); the Departments of Family & Community Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio (CRJ); and the Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH) Center, San Antonio, TX (CRJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Over the past 20 years there has been a statistically significant trend toward fewer family physicians identifying as being in solo practice. Further study to determine the reasons for this decline and its impact on access to care will be critical because rural areas are more dependent on solo practitioners.

  • Health Care Systems
  • Health Policy
  • Rural Health

A current common perception in medicine is that physician practices are rapidly integrating with larger health care systems and that solo practices are vanishing. Little has been published on the subject; however, 2 recent studies suggest that about 18% all physicians and primary care physicians are in solo (physician) practices.1,2 Our objective was to examine changes in family physicians reporting being in solo practice from 1993 to 2013.

We used practice organization data provided by family physicians as part of their application for the American Board of Family Medicine's recertification examinations in 1993, 1998, 2003, 2008, and 2013. We used descriptive statistics to calculate the percentage of family physicians reporting solo practice in each year and tested for trend using Cochran-Armitage tests. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the American Academy of Family Physicians Institutional Review Board.

Numbers of family physicians in each cohort ranged from 6,252 in 1998 to 10,063 in 2013 (Figure 1). The percentage reporting solo practice was 13.9% in 1993, stayed nearly constant around 16% from 1998 to 2008, then decreased significantly to 11.0% in 2013 (P < .01).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Percentage of family physicians recertifying with the American Board of Family Medicine who reported working in a solo practice in 1992 to 2013.

There may be several explanations for the trend of declining solo practice. For example, physicians in solo practices may lack resources to undergo necessary practice transformation, and merging with larger practices or networks may provide such resources.3 Other research suggests that solo physicians experience more environmental and individual barriers to the adoption of innovation.4,5 Regional extension centers were established in part for this very reason: to provide resources and facilitation to small and solo practices to speed the adoption of electronic health records. The Primary Care Extension Program was authorized by the Affordable Care Act for similar reasons but with broader transformation support. Despite the Primary Care Extension Program not being funded, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has funded related demonstrations in several states. In addition, Vermont and North Carolina have created for small practices shared resources that they could not afford independently, such as mental health providers, social workers, and chronic care mangers.

Is the observed trend important? Similar trends in other countries raise concerns about threats to continuity and its value.6 It may also threaten access to care in rural and remote areas, where solo practices are more common.7 With recent evidence indicating that small practices (1 or 2 physicians) have fewer preventable hospital admissions8 and a systematic review finding little evidence that small practices have worse quality,9 studying this trend will be important to determine its underpinning reasons and its impact on access to and quality of care. If solo family physicians are an endangered species, we need to understand what it means and why it is happening because once they are gone, they will be difficult to revive.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflict of interest: Drs. Peterson and Phillips are both employees of the American Board of Family Medicine.

  • See Related Commentary on Page 7.

  • Received for publication July 30, 2014.
  • Revision received September 15, 2014.
  • Accepted for publication September 22, 2014.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kane CK,
    2. Emmons DW
    . New data on physician practice arrangements: private practice remains strong despite shifts toward hospital employment. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2013. Available from: http://www.nmms.org/sites/default/files/images/2013_9_23_ama_survey_prp-physician-practice-arrangements.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2014.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Phillips RL Jr.,
    2. Klink K,
    3. Petterson SM,
    4. Kojima N,
    5. Bazemore AW
    . The continued importance of small practices in the primary care landscape. Am Fam Physician 2014;90:Online.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Scholle SH,
    2. Asche SE,
    3. Morton S,
    4. Solberg LI,
    5. Tirodkar MA,
    6. Jaen CR
    . Support and strategies for change among small patient-centered medical home practices. Ann Fam Med 2013;11(Suppl 1):S6–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Scott SD,
    2. Plotnikoff RC,
    3. Karunamuni N,
    4. Bize R,
    5. Rodgers W
    . Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK). Implement Sci 2008;3:41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Burt CW,
    2. Sisk JE
    . Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1334–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Knight JC,
    2. Dowden JJ,
    3. Worrall GJ,
    4. Gadag VG,
    5. Murphy MM
    . Does higher continuity of family physician care reduce hospitalizations in elderly people with diabetes? Popul Health Manag 2009;12:81–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schulte B,
    2. Mannino D,
    3. Royal K,
    4. Brown S,
    5. Peterson L,
    6. Puffer J
    . Community size and organization of practice predict family physician recertification success. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:383–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Casalino LP,
    2. Pesko MF,
    3. Ryan AM,
    4. et al
    . Small primary care physician practices have low rates of preventable hospital admissions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:1680–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ng CW,
    2. Ng KP
    . Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2013;63:e604–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue 1
January-February 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fewer Family Physicians Are in Solo Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Fewer Family Physicians Are in Solo Practices
Lars E. Peterson, Elizabeth Baxley, Carlos Roberto Jaén, Robert L. Phillips
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 28 (1) 11-12; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140217

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fewer Family Physicians Are in Solo Practices
Lars E. Peterson, Elizabeth Baxley, Carlos Roberto Jaén, Robert L. Phillips
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 28 (1) 11-12; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140217
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Solo Practitioners Remain Important Contributors to Primary Care
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Proportion of Family Physicians in Solo and Small Practices is on the Decline
  • Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated healthcare delivery systems: a scoping review protocol
  • Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices
  • Solo and Small Practices: A Vital, Diverse Part of Primary Care
  • Solo Practitioners Remain Important Contributors to Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Female Family Physicians Are More Racially Diverse Than Their Male Counterparts in Federal Sites
  • Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
  • Family Physician Racial Identity: An Analysis of “Other” Race Selection and Implications for Future Data Collection
Show more Policy Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Health Care Systems
  • Health Policy
  • Rural Health

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire