Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Research ArticleAbout Practice-Based Research Networks

Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Are Promising Laboratories for Conducting Dissemination and Implementation Research

John Heintzman, Rachel Gold, Alexander Krist, Jay Crosson, Sonja Likumahuwa and Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2014, 27 (6) 759-762; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140092
John Heintzman
the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (JH, SL, JED); the Kaiser Center for Health Research (RG); Virginia Commonwealth University (AK); and Mathematica Policy Research (JC).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Gold
the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (JH, SL, JED); the Kaiser Center for Health Research (RG); Virginia Commonwealth University (AK); and Mathematica Policy Research (JC).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Krist
the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (JH, SL, JED); the Kaiser Center for Health Research (RG); Virginia Commonwealth University (AK); and Mathematica Policy Research (JC).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay Crosson
the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (JH, SL, JED); the Kaiser Center for Health Research (RG); Virginia Commonwealth University (AK); and Mathematica Policy Research (JC).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonja Likumahuwa
the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (JH, SL, JED); the Kaiser Center for Health Research (RG); Virginia Commonwealth University (AK); and Mathematica Policy Research (JC).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer E. DeVoe
the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (JH, SL, JED); the Kaiser Center for Health Research (RG); Virginia Commonwealth University (AK); and Mathematica Policy Research (JC).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Vinson C,
    3. Chambers D,
    4. Khoury MJ,
    5. Kaplan RM,
    6. Hunter C
    . National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 2012;102:1274–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Collins FS
    . Research agenda. Opportunities for research and NIH. Science 2010;327:36–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Dissemination and implementation research in health (R01). Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2012. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-10-038.html. Accessed September 16, 2014.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Teal R,
    2. Bergmire DM,
    3. Johnston M,
    4. Weiner BJ
    . Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study. Implement Sci 2012;7:41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. van Tulder MW,
    2. Croft PR,
    3. van Splunteren P,
    4. et al
    . Disseminating and implementing the results of back pain research in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:E121–7.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Grimshaw JM,
    2. Shirran L,
    3. Thomas R,
    4. et al
    . Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39(8 Suppl 2):II2–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Damschroder LJ,
    2. Aron DC,
    3. Keith RE,
    4. Kirsh SR,
    5. Alexander JA,
    6. Lowery JC
    . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Titler MG,
    2. Wilson DS,
    3. Resnick B,
    4. Shever LL
    . Dissemination and implementation: INQRI's potential impact. Med Care 2013;51(4 Suppl 2):S41–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Young DM,
    3. MacGregor K,
    4. Holtrop JS
    . Practice-based research in primary care: facilitator of, or barrier to, practice improvement? Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 2):S28–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Fryer GE Jr.,
    3. Yawn BP,
    4. Lanier D,
    5. Dovey SM
    . The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med 2001;344:2021–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Calmbach WL,
    2. Ryan JG,
    3. Baldwin LM,
    4. Knox L
    . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs): meeting the challenges of the future. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:572–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Heintzman J,
    2. Likumahuwa S,
    3. Nelson C,
    4. et al
    . “Not a kidney or a lung”: research challenges in a network of safety net clinics. Fam Med Feb 2014;46:105–11.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bertram S,
    2. Graham D,
    3. Kurland M,
    4. Pace W,
    5. Madison S,
    6. Yawn BP
    . Communication is the key to success in pragmatic clinical trials in practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:571–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rebchook GM,
    2. Kegeles SM,
    3. Huebner D,
    4. Team TR
    . Translating research into practice: the dissemination and initial implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program. AIDS Educ Prev 2006;18(4 Suppl A):119–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dudl RJ,
    2. Wang MC,
    3. Wong M,
    4. Bellows J
    . Preventing myocardial infarction and stroke with a simplified bundle of cardioprotective medications. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e88–94.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Practice-based research networks (PBRNs). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research; 2014. Available from: http://pbrn.ahrq.gov/. Accessed March 10, 2014.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Peterson KA,
    2. Lipman PD,
    3. Lange CJ,
    4. Cohen RA,
    5. Durako S
    . Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:565–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Accelerating the dissemination and implementation of PCOR findings into primary care practice (R18). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-HS-14-008.html. Accessed September 16, 2014.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fransen GAJ,
    2. van Marrewijk CJ,
    3. Mujakovic S,
    4. et al
    . Pragmatic trials in primary care. Methodological challenges and solutions demonstrated by the DIAMOND-study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Godwin M,
    2. Ruhland L,
    3. Casson I,
    4. et al
    . Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Using pragmatic clinical trials to test the effectiveness of patient-centered medical home models in real-world settings. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research; 2013.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Hames CG,
    3. Nutting PA Sr.
    . Potential of practice-based research networks: experiences from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. J Fam Pract 1994;38:400–6.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Vollmer WM,
    3. Petrik A,
    4. et al
    . Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer 2014;14:55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Levy BT,
    2. Hartz A,
    3. Woodworth G,
    4. Xu Y,
    5. Sinift S
    . Interventions to improving osteoporosis screening: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:360–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Glenn BA,
    3. Glasgow RE,
    4. et al
    . Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project. Implement Sci 2013;8:73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Daniels EC,
    2. Bacon J,
    3. Denisio S,
    4. et al
    . Translation squared: improving asthma care for high-disparity populations through a safety net practice-based research network. J Asthma 2005;42:499–505.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Sanchez J,
    3. Petrik A,
    4. Kapka T,
    5. Devoe J,
    6. Green B
    . Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ 2014;29:86–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Tabak RG,
    2. Khoong EC,
    3. Chambers DA,
    4. Brownson RC
    . Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(3):337–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Re-Aim. Resources and tools. Blacksburg (VA): Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech; 2014. Available from: http://www.re-aim.org/resources_and_tools/index.html. Accessed September 16, 2014.
  30. 30.↵
    The North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute. Dissemination and implementation theories and frameworks. Available from: http://tracs.unc.edu/index.php/d-iportal/theories-and-frameworks. Accessed June 14, 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 27 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 27, Issue 6
November-December 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Are Promising Laboratories for Conducting Dissemination and Implementation Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Are Promising Laboratories for Conducting Dissemination and Implementation Research
John Heintzman, Rachel Gold, Alexander Krist, Jay Crosson, Sonja Likumahuwa, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2014, 27 (6) 759-762; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140092

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Are Promising Laboratories for Conducting Dissemination and Implementation Research
John Heintzman, Rachel Gold, Alexander Krist, Jay Crosson, Sonja Likumahuwa, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2014, 27 (6) 759-762; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140092
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • D&I Research Needs “Real-World” Laboratories
    • PBRNs: A Promising Setting for D&I
    • Pragmatic Trials: A Strategic PBRN Strength
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Importance of Primary Care Research in Understanding Health Inequities in the United States
  • Adapting Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments to Fit Context for Practice-Based Research (PBR)
  • Dissemination and Implementation Science in Primary Care Research and Practice: Contributions and Opportunities
  • Implementation of Technology-based Patient Engagement Strategies within Practice-based Research Networks
  • Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) in the Era of Integrated Delivery Systems
  • Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Participating in Practice-based Research (PBR): A Report from the Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN)
  • Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs)
  • Health Information Technology Needs Help from Primary Care Researchers
  • Practice-based Research Networks at the Crossroads of Research Translation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Bridging the Gaps between Communities, Funders, and Policymakers
  • Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report
  • Lessons from Initiating the First Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practice-based Research Network (WH-PBRN) Study
Show more About Practice-Based Research Networks

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Dissemination and Implementation Science
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Practice-Based Research
  • Pragmatic Trials
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire