Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
  • Log out
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Brief ReportPolicy Brief

A Small Percentage of Family Physicians Report Time Devoted to Research

Jennifer R. Voorhees, Imam M. Xierali, Andrew W. Bazemore, Robert L. Phillips, Carlos R. Jaén and James C. Puffer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2013, 26 (1) 7-8; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120125
Jennifer R. Voorhees
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JRV); Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Washington, DC (IMX); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (AWB, RLP); and the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (CRJ, JCP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Imam M. Xierali
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JRV); Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Washington, DC (IMX); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (AWB, RLP); and the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (CRJ, JCP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew W. Bazemore
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JRV); Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Washington, DC (IMX); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (AWB, RLP); and the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (CRJ, JCP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Phillips Jr.
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JRV); Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Washington, DC (IMX); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (AWB, RLP); and the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (CRJ, JCP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos R. Jaén
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JRV); Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Washington, DC (IMX); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (AWB, RLP); and the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (CRJ, JCP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Puffer
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JRV); Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Washington, DC (IMX); the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (AWB, RLP); and the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (CRJ, JCP).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Despite calls by family medicine organizations to build research capacity within the discipline, few family physicians report research activity. Policy that supports efforts in family medicine research and increases awareness of opportunities for primary care research in the practice setting is essential for family medicine to expand its scholarly foundations.

For decades, family medicine professional organizations have called for increasing the discipline's capacity for research and scholarly work.1,2 There is widespread recognition of the need for relevant research in the primary care setting to improve patient and population outcomes, and family physicians are uniquely poised to conduct such research because they provide the largest volume of health care of any single specialty (nearly 250 million patient visits annually).3 Despite this acute awareness and need, research remains a particular challenge to the profession, and family physicians are minimally involved with the National Institutes Health compared with other specialties.4,5

Of American Board of Family Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination candidates from 2007 to 2009 (n = 28,505), 4.9% reported spending any time on research, with 3.9% spending ≤10% of their time, 0.7% spending >10% but <50%, and 0.3% spending >50% of their time on research (Figure 1). Urban family physicians were more likely to do research compared with rural physicians (5.4% vs 2.8%, respectively). Men were more likely to report any research activity (5.3% vs 4.3%), but women who performed research were more likely than men to report devoting >10% of their time (27% vs 18%). Thirty-one percent of full-time faculty and 8% of part-time faculty members participated in research, compared with 2.5% of nonfaculty members. Participation was relatively equal across ages.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Percentage of family physicians reporting time devoted to research in 2007–2009.

The effort to promote translation of research into primary care requires more family physicians to be trained as researchers and translators. Family medicine organizations should renew support to build research capacity and push family physicians to incorporate scholarly activity into their practice behavior through targeted continuing medical education/maintenance of certification activities and through assistance with federally mandated quality improvement initiatives. Research advocates and governmental organizations, particularly the National Institutes of Health, should increase the funds available to support a primary care research agenda to enable broader participation of family physicians dedicating sufficient time to important research endeavors.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: Support was provided by the American Board of Family Medicine, which contracts annually for health policy/health services research conducted by the Robert Graham Center for studies related to maintenance of certification and quality.

  • Conflict of interest: none declared.

  • The paper was submitted for publication while Dr. Xierali was at the American Academy of Family Physicians. He is currently Manager for Public Health and Diversity Data Initiatives at the Association of American Medical Colleges.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dickinson WP,
    2. Stange KC,
    3. Ebell MH,
    4. Ewigman BG,
    5. Green LA
    . Involving all family physicians and family medicine faculty members in the use and generation of new knowledge. Fam Med 2000;32:480–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    What does it mean to build research capacity? Fam Med 2002;34:678–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hsiao CJ,
    2. Cherry DK,
    3. Beatty PC,
    4. Rechtsteiner EA
    . National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Report 2010;(27):1–32.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lucan SC,
    2. Phillips RL Jr.,
    3. Bazemore AW
    . Off the roadmap? Family medicine's grant funding and committee representation at NIH. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:534–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ley TJ,
    2. Rosenberg LE
    . The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. JAMA 2005;294:1343–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 26 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 26, Issue 1
January-February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Small Percentage of Family Physicians Report Time Devoted to Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Small Percentage of Family Physicians Report Time Devoted to Research
Jennifer R. Voorhees, Imam M. Xierali, Andrew W. Bazemore, Robert L. Phillips, Carlos R. Jaén, James C. Puffer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 26 (1) 7-8; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120125

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Small Percentage of Family Physicians Report Time Devoted to Research
Jennifer R. Voorhees, Imam M. Xierali, Andrew W. Bazemore, Robert L. Phillips, Carlos R. Jaén, James C. Puffer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 26 (1) 7-8; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120125
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Getting started in research, redefined: five questions for clinically focused physicians in family medicine
  • Building research culture and capacity in academic family medicine departments: Insights from a simulation workshop
  • Unfinished Business: The Role of Research in Family Medicine
  • The Impact of Debt on Young Family Physicians: Unanswered Questions with Critical Implications
  • Uncloaking Family Medicine Research: So Much To Know, So Little Time . . .
  • Researching Together and Improving Practice Outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Female Family Physicians Are More Racially Diverse Than Their Male Counterparts in Federal Sites
  • Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
  • Family Physician Racial Identity: An Analysis of “Other” Race Selection and Implications for Future Data Collection
Show more Policy Brief

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire