Abstract
The Office of the National Coordinator and recent federal policy have dramatically expanded incentives for adoption and “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHRs). However, little reliable information regarding adoption rates in primary care, and some concern exists about lagging adoption rates beyond large group practices.1
Reported EHR adoption rates among family physicians—the largest and most widely distributed group of primary care providers—vary widely. We used a unique census survey that captured self-reported use of EHRs among this critical cohort, and had a 100% response rate among family medicine diplomats. Specifically, we used data from diplomates who were applying for the maintenance of certification (MOC) examination (part III, cognitive assessment) during the years 2006 through 2009 (n = 8263, n = 9507, n = 9692, and n = 7941, respectively). We stratified the data along the 2003 Rural Urban Continuum Codes to determine whether there would be variation with increasing rurality.
The rate of EHR adoption among family physicians rose significantly between 2006 (37%) and 2009 (55%) (Figure 1). The 4-year (2006–2009) pooled adoption rate across the rural to urban continuum revealed a slight but statistically insignificant decrease in adoption with increasing rurality, consistent with evidence that rural family physicians are keeping up with urban peers in MOC.2 However, significant variation at the state level was apparent.
A majority of board-certified family physicians in the United States now use EHRs. The most rural of family physicians lag slightly behind the national adoption frequency, but 4-year trends suggest similar rates of uptake. Though board-certified family physicians may differ from those who do not maintain certification, understanding uptake among this cohort is critical because MOC and the adoption of health information technology both are essential elements of quality improvement in primary care. Although further monitoring of adoption trends is important, the mounting challenge will not be adoption but the sufficiency of EHRs to help family physicians take better care of their patients.
Notes
This article was externally peer reviewed.
Funding: none.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
- Received for publication January 6, 2011.
- Revision received January 26, 2011.
- Accepted for publication January 26, 2011.