Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of hepatitis antibodies and liver enzymes with impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed diabetes in adults.
Methods: We analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004, a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized US population. Among adults (aged ≥20 years of age) who were not problem drinkers, we examined hepatitis B and C antibodies and the liver enzymes aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and γglutamyl transaminase (GGT) with impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed diabetes (unweighted, n = 5234; weighted, n = 172,626,805). Logistic regression models were computed controlling for major risk factors that drive diabetes screening, including age, gender, race, diagnosed hypertension, diagnosed hypercholesterolemia, and obesity.
Results: In unadjusted analyses 51% of individuals with undiagnosed diabetes have elevated GGT versus 20% of individuals without diabetes or impaired fasting glucose (P = .01). Similarly, 43% of individuals with undiagnosed diabetes have elevated ALT versus 23% of individuals without diabetes or impaired fasting glucose (P = .01). AST and Hepatitis C antibodies were not associated with undiagnosed diabetes. In adjusted analyses, elevated GGT (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.44–3.20) and ALT (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.06–3.20) are associated with undiagnosed diabetes. Similarly, in adjusted analyses, elevated GGT (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00–1.53) and ALT (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.15–1.79) are associated with impaired fasting glucose. Hepatitis antibodies, reporting a current liver problem, or AST were associated with having undiagnosed diabetes in adjusted analyses.
Conclusions: Liver function is associated with undiagnosed diabetes and impaired fasting glucose and may justify further investigation as a risk stratification variable for undiagnosed diabetes or impaired fasting glucose.
Insulin resistance can be thought of as being composed of hepatic and extrahepatic components that play a role in impaired fasting glucose.1 Consequently, hepatic problems affect insulin resistance. Hepatitis is associated with insulin resistance.2 Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with insulin resistance, and clearance of HCV improves insulin resistance.3 This evidence would suggest that hepatitis and impaired liver function may be associated with the development of diabetes.
Some limited data on the relationship between liver enzymes and diabetes has suggested that elevated liver enzymes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and γglutamyl transaminase (GGT) are associated with the development of diabetes.4–8 Other data has suggested that the relationship between liver enzymes and diabetes may be modified by the presence of inflammation, with C-reactive protein (CRP) playing a predictive role with liver enzymes and diabetes.9
Because of the asymptomatic nature of type 2 diabetes, between one third and a half of individuals with diabetes are undiagnosed.10 The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes for adults in the United States has been estimated at 2.4%, representing 4.9 million adults and nearly 30% of all diabetes in the United States in 1999 to 2000.11 A significant proportion of people (25%) with undiagnosed diabetes have signs of nephropathy, suggesting that undiagnosed diabetes is not a benign condition.12 Consequently, different risk factors for undiagnosed diabetes have been identified as ways to guide screening strategies.13–16 The American Diabetes Association recommends screening men and women ≥45 years of age for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes.17 The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for diabetes among adults if they have the risk factor of hypertension.18 Diabetes UK recommends screening of white people >40 years of age and people from black, Asian, and minority ethnic groups >25 years of age with one or more major risk factors.19
There is little evidence as to whether the presence of hepatitis antibodies and elevated liver enzymes is associated with either current impaired fasting glucose or undiagnosed diabetes. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of hepatitis antibodies and liver enzymes with impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed diabetes. We hypothesized that elevated liver enzymes will be associated with the presence of impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed diabetes.
Methods
The data for this study were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2004, a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized US population. The NHANES design includes an oversampling of minorities and an ability to make population estimates. More information on the methodology of the NHANES 1999 to 2004, including laboratory assessment, can be found at the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) website.20 This study included fasting participants ≥20 years old who were not problem drinkers of alcohol. Problem drinking was defined as >14 drinks per week for men or >7 drinks per week for women. We excluded binge drinkers, defined as ≥5 drinks during 1 day per week.21
Variables
Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose
Diagnosed diabetes was defined as self-report of a doctor's diagnosis of diabetes. Undiagnosed diabetes was defined as patients reporting that they had not been diagnosed by a doctor with diabetes but who had fasting plasma glucose of ≥126 mg/dL. Impaired fasting glucose was defined as patients not diagnosed with diabetes who had fasting plasma glucose of 100 to 125 mg/dL. Those not diagnosed with diabetes who had fasting plasma glucose <100 mg/dL were classified as normal.16
Hepatitis Antibodies and Liver Function
Hepatitis B core antibody and hepatitis C antibody (confirmed) were classified as positive or negative. The Ortho HBc Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Test System is a qualitative ELISA for the detection of total antibody to anti-HBc in human serum or plasma. The Chiron RIBA 3.0 Strip Immunoblot Assay (SIA; Chiron Corporation, Inc., Emeryville, CA) is an in vitro qualitative enzyme immunoassay for the detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in human serum or plasma. The SIA was used to confirm hepatitis C identified using an anti-hepatitis C virus screening ELISA. CRP was classified as low (<0.3 mg/dL) or elevated (≥0.3 mg/dL).22 After previous research relating liver enzymes to the development of diabetes, liver enzymes were classified as low (below the fourth quartile) or high (fourth quartile). ALT ≥27.78 u/L was classified as elevated; AST ≥25.51 u/L was classified as elevated; and GGT ≥29.48 u/L was classified as elevated.4–6 We also evaluated patients based on their answers to the questions, Has a doctor or health professional ever told you that you have a liver condition? and Do you still have a liver condition?
Control Variables
In addition to age and gender, the control variable of self-reported race/ethnicity was created out of a question about the person's race and an additional question about Hispanic ethnicity. Race/ethnicity was classified as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and other. Body mass index was calculated as kg/m2 from height and weight measured during the NHANES physical examination and was analyzed as a continuous variable. Because hypercholesterolemia and hypertension are risk factors that drive screening for diabetes we felt that it was important to control for previously diagnosed hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. Previous diagnosis would allow health care providers to be aware of the condition. High cholesterol was defined as the self-report of a doctor having told the participant he or she had high cholesterol. Those who had not been tested were considered to have not been diagnosed with high cholesterol. Hypertension was defined as the self-report of a doctor ever having told the participant he or she had high blood pressure or hypertension.
Analysis
Because this survey is based on a complex sampling design that makes it representative of the noninstitutionalized US population, we are able to make nationally representative estimates. We used SUDAAN software (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) to account for the weighting and complex sampling design.
We evaluated bivariate relationships between hepatitis antibodies, CRP, and liver enzymes with diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and normal participants using χ2 analysis. Because biomarkers may be affected by treatment regimens once an individual has been diagnosed with diabetes, we conducted additional analyses focusing on individuals with undiagnosed disease. We conducted adjusted logistic regressions, excluding patients with diagnosed diabetes and predicting undiagnosed impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed diabetes alone. Control variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, previous diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia, and previous diagnosis of hypertension.
Finally, we examined whether the association between liver enzymes and impaired fasting glucose or undiagnosed diabetes was affected by elevated CRP. We created variables with 4 categories: 1) elevated liver enzyme, elevated CRP; 2) low liver enzyme, elevated CRP; 3) elevated liver enzyme, low CRP; and 4) low liver enzyme, low CRP. The combination of GGT, AST, and ATL with CRP were used in 3 separate logistic regressions to predict undiagnosed diabetes or impaired fasting glucose, adjusted for the previously identified control variables. In the analyses of this study we assumed a level of P < .05 to represent statistical significance.
Results
The characteristics of the population are presented in Table 1. A substantial proportion of the sample had elevated liver enzymes and a much smaller proportion, as might be expected, had positive antibodies for hepatitis B or C. Table 2 shows that, when liver enzymes are crossed with diabetes status, an increased proportion of individuals with undiagnosed diabetes have elevated GGT and ALT.
In adjusted logistic regressions, hepatitis antibodies are not significantly associated with either undiagnosed diabetes or the more broadly defined category including undiagnosed diabetes and the prediabetic state of impaired fasting glucose (Table 3). Elevated GGT and ALT, but not AST, are associated with undiagnosed diabetes as well as impaired fasting glucose. People who report currently having a doctor-diagnosed liver condition were not associated with undiagnosed diabetes (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.10–9.70) or impaired fasting glucose (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.43–2.40).
Table 4 presents the results of the adjusted logistic regressions that include liver enzymes combined with CRP. As with the single variable analyses, in the combined variable analysis there is no relationship between undiagnosed diabetes and AST. Neither ALT nor GGT seems to indicate an interaction between liver enzymes and CRP and the likelihood of having undiagnosed diabetes. The results for impaired fasting glucose did seem to suggest that having elevated GGT and elevated CRP increased the likelihood of having impaired fasting glucose.
Discussion
The results of this study add to our knowledge of current markers that are associated with the presence of undetected diabetes. Hepatitis B was associated with diabetes in unadjusted analyses, but when other risk factors for undiagnosed diabetes were accounted for this marker was no longer significant. However, both elevated ALT and GGT were independently associated with a significantly greater likelihood of having undiagnosed diabetes and impaired fasting glucose. Previous research has suggested that elevated ALT and GGT are associated with the development of diabetes.4–8 This suggests that not only is liver function associated with the development of diabetes but it also seems to be a risk factor for currently having undiagnosed diabetes.
The finding that AST was not significantly associated may be because, although ALT is found primarily in the liver, AST is found not only in the liver but also in cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, kidneys, brain, pancreas, lungs, leukocytes, and erythrocytes (in decreasing order of concentration). Thus, it may not be as specific a marker of the liver injury that is associated with diabetes and impaired fasting glucose.
One implication of these findings for clinical practice is that undiagnosed diabetes should be considered as a possibility in instances of elevated ALT or GGT. A finding of elevated liver enzymes may act for clinicians as a cue to consider an investigation of the possibility of undiagnosed diabetes or impaired fasting glucose, even in the absence of other common risk factors. These results suggest that not only is liver function a risk factor for the development of diabetes—it is also a marker that clinicians should consider for increased suspicion of undetected diabetes.
Several limitations to this study should be noted. First, although this study used a strategy for identifying undiagnosed diabetes that has been previously used in the NHANES for population-based estimates, it is not consistent with the recommendations for a clinical diagnosis of diabetes because of the one-time assessment.11,12 Second, the NHANES provides estimates for majority of individuals in the United States but it is limited to noninstitutionalized individuals in the United States, and thus the relationship between liver enzymes and undiagnosed diabetes may not hold for prisoners or other institutionalized individuals. Several variables are based on self-reports by the patients (eg, previous diagnosis by a doctor of diabetes, high cholesterol, or hypertension). Although the National Center for Health Statistics has for many years uses a cognitive laboratory to evaluate and validate items regarding receipt of health services and health behaviors, there is a possibility of response bias in these questions.23
The results presented here suggest that elevated liver tests, especially of ALT and GGT, indicate that clinicians might want to investigate whether or not a patient has undiagnosed diabetes. Liver function as a risk stratification variable for undetected diabetes or impaired fasting glucose may be worth further investigation.
Notes
This article was externally peer reviewed.
Funding: This project was supported in part by grant 1 P30AG021677 from the National Institute on Aging and by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
See Related Commentary on Page 487.
- Received for publication February 21, 2008.
- Revision received May 20, 2008.
- Accepted for publication May 21, 2008.