Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value?

References

1. ↵
   HEDIS Benchmarks [homepage on the internet]. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance [cited 10 May 2006]. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org.
2. ↵
   Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr., Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262: 925–30.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 743–50.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   AQA [homepage on the internet]. The Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance; ©2005 [cited 2006 May 10]. Available from http://www.ambulatoryqualityalliance.org.
5. ↵
   AQA Workgroup Membership. The Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance; c2005 [cited 10 May 2006]. Available from: http://www.ambulatoryqualityalliance.org/files/AQAWorkgroupMembershipLists.doc.
6. ↵
   AQA releases ambulatory quality measures. Med Health 2005; 59: 3–4.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   Resolution No. 302 (Kentucky A) [cited 20 Sept 2006]. Available from: http://www.aafp.org.
8. ↵
   Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The General Health Policy Model: An integrated approach. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. New York: Raven Press; 1996. p. 309.
9. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1988; 30: 473–83.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring functioning and well-being: the medical outcomes study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 1992.
11. Nelson E, Wasson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 55S–63S.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. Parkerson GR, Gehlbach SH, Wagner EH, James SA, Clapp NE, Muhlbaier LH. The Duke-UNC Health Profile: An adult health status instrument for primary care. Med Care 1981; 19: 806–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Soc Health Illness 1980; 2: 232–46.

    OpenUrl
14. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Gilson BJ, Morris JR. The Sickness Impact Profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6: 393–415.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
15. Jette AM, Davies AR, Cleary PD, et al. The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 143–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. New York: World Health Organization; 1947.
17. ↵
    Weber DO. The dark side of P4P. Physician Exec 2005; 31: 20–5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. ↵
    Williams TR. Practical design and implementation considerations in pay-for-performance programs. Am J Man Care 2006; 12: 77–80.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Mirsky RS. Physician buy-in is essential for pay for performance. Physician Exec 2005; 31: 16–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    Idler EL, Kasl S. Health perceptions and survival: do global evaluations of health status really predict mortality? J Gerontol 1991; 46: S55–S65.

    OpenUrlAbstract
21. ↵
    Steiger B. Poll finds physicians very wary of pay-for-performance programs. Physician Exec 2005; 31: 6–11.

    OpenUrlPubMed