Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value?

Paul L. Dassow
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2007, 20 (1) 1-8; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060082
Paul L. Dassow
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    HEDIS Benchmarks [homepage on the internet]. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance [cited 10 May 2006]. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org.
  2. ↵
    Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr., Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262: 925–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 743–50.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    AQA [homepage on the internet]. The Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance; ©2005 [cited 2006 May 10]. Available from http://www.ambulatoryqualityalliance.org.
  5. ↵
    AQA Workgroup Membership. The Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance; c2005 [cited 10 May 2006]. Available from: http://www.ambulatoryqualityalliance.org/files/AQAWorkgroupMembershipLists.doc.
  6. ↵
    AQA releases ambulatory quality measures. Med Health 2005; 59: 3–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Resolution No. 302 (Kentucky A) [cited 20 Sept 2006]. Available from: http://www.aafp.org.
  8. ↵
    Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The General Health Policy Model: An integrated approach. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. New York: Raven Press; 1996. p. 309.
  9. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1988; 30: 473–83.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring functioning and well-being: the medical outcomes study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 1992.
  11. Nelson E, Wasson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 55S–63S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. Parkerson GR, Gehlbach SH, Wagner EH, James SA, Clapp NE, Muhlbaier LH. The Duke-UNC Health Profile: An adult health status instrument for primary care. Med Care 1981; 19: 806–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Soc Health Illness 1980; 2: 232–46.
    OpenUrl
  14. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Gilson BJ, Morris JR. The Sickness Impact Profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6: 393–415.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. Jette AM, Davies AR, Cleary PD, et al. The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 143–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. New York: World Health Organization; 1947.
  17. ↵
    Weber DO. The dark side of P4P. Physician Exec 2005; 31: 20–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Williams TR. Practical design and implementation considerations in pay-for-performance programs. Am J Man Care 2006; 12: 77–80.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Mirsky RS. Physician buy-in is essential for pay for performance. Physician Exec 2005; 31: 16–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Idler EL, Kasl S. Health perceptions and survival: do global evaluations of health status really predict mortality? J Gerontol 1991; 46: S55–S65.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Steiger B. Poll finds physicians very wary of pay-for-performance programs. Physician Exec 2005; 31: 6–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 1
January-February 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value?
Paul L. Dassow
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 20 (1) 1-8; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value?
Paul L. Dassow
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 20 (1) 1-8; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060082
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix A
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles in 2009
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire