Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Correspondence

Russell G. Robertson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice September 2003, 16 (5) 466-467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.16.5.466
Russell G. Robertson
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: I recently completed the fourth examination en route to what I hope will be the maintenance of my board certification as a family physician. In doing so, I remain convinced of the wisdom of the founders of our specialty in setting this requirement, which differentiates us from most other specialties, as one key pillar in cementing the credibility of family medicine in the minds of our fellow physicians and the patients we serve. At the same time, I have real questions about the content of the examination, its practical application to day-to-day practice, and the methods by which it is administered.

I think that members of our specialty may be missing some opportunities that may be available through the examination that would enhance the quality of medicine that we practice and strengthen our role/image in the eyes of the public at large. The greatest opportunity the examination offers is the chance to standardize the knowledge base of family physicians. There is ample information available regarding the core content of family medicine from a conceptual perspective.1 Why not use the examination to underscore this in an effort to foster some degree of uniformity in the specialty? As some of the information from the Future of Family Medicine project clearly indicates, the public does not have a clear or consistent concept of who we are or what we do.2 I suggest that the ABFP in concert with the AAFP refine and publish specific information deemed central to the role of the practicing family physician and make this information available well in advance of the exam, with the expectation that this material will be essential for review.

A second opportunity is to use the exam to diminish the vulnerability of family physicians to malpractice litigation. By surveying malpractice cases with family physicians as defendants, trends could be identified that could then be translated into published case reviews made available on an annual basis that would also be incorporated into the exam via test questions. We would be providing immediate assistance to family physicians in practice and taking careful steps to insure the public that their confidence in us is not misplaced.

A third opportunity is related to highlighting the implementation of new practice guidelines. These are being continually developed; currently, they are the responsibility of individual practitioners to find and implement on their own. Although it is technically feasible to remain current on an individual basis, the value that the Board would add by prioritizing and collating these and subsequently making them available to family physicians would be substantial. This would be further emphasized by their inclusion as content material suitable for testing on the recertification exam.

Instead, the exam as it is now constructed is essentially a National Boards part IV. It is an attempt to encompass the totality of medicine in a 1-day exam that by definition will exclude large amounts of material of real clinical significance. One of the most common questions fielded by the ABFP is “How can I prepare for the certification or re-certification examination?” The Board responds, “The answer is complex; there is no straightforward or simple way to answer it.”3 The authors of this article further expand on the answer, indicating that the best way to prepare is to be “actively involved in the full breadth of family practice,” defined as reading appropriate educational materials and attending CME meetings and hospital conferences.1 The article further expands on the methods for assembling the questions.

In my opinion, it is of no value to memorize information that is immediately available from one’s personal digital assistant, yet many of the test questions require this information. In my attempts to prepare for each recertification examination and to stay as current as I can with the literature, I have taken what I believe were well-run board review courses. Despite the content and organization of these courses, their real relevance to the exam was limited at best and offered very little new information. I also wonder how many examinees look beyond their scores with the intent to sort through the questions answered incorrectly and consider their applicability to clinical practice.

I support of the Board’s progress in moving toward computer-based administration that will diminish the need for what I believe is excessive supervision for written examinees. I also hope that the architects of future exams might consider ways to increase the relevance of the exam such that it might be a key factor in underscoring the essential nature of family medicine and the unique approach of family physicians as health care providers.

References

  1. ↵
    Recommended curriculum guidelines for Family Practice residents. Leawood, KS: American Academy of Family Physicians, 2000.
  2. ↵
    Future of Family Medicine Task Project. Available at: URL: http://www.futurefamilymed.org.
  3. ↵
    Anonymous. Preparing for the certification and recertification examination. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000; 13: 155–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 16 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 16, Issue 5
1 Sep 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correspondence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
19 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Correspondence
Russell G. Robertson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Sep 2003, 16 (5) 466-467; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.5.466

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Correspondence
Russell G. Robertson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Sep 2003, 16 (5) 466-467; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.5.466
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire