Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube

Cervical Cancer Screening: Preparing for the Era of Self-Collection

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Lisa F. Soltani, MD MPH; Ilana Addis, MD, MPH, MBA; Paul Lin, MS; Neil Kamdar, MA; Marie Claire O'Dwyer, MB, Bch, BAO, MPH; Alisa P. Young, MD; Diane M. Harper, MD, MPH, MS

Corresponding Author: Diane M. Harper, MD, MPH, MS; Departments of Family Medicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan

Email: harperdi@med.umich.edu

DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2025.250040R1

Keywords: Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer, Family Medicine, Gynecology, Internal Medicine, Medical Education, Obstetrics, Population Health, Practice Management, Preventive Care, Primary Health Care, Public Health, Women's Health, Workforce

Dates: Submitted: 01-29-2025; Revised: 04-07-2025; Accepted: 05-12-2025

Status: In production. 

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening (CCS) is shifting from in-office to self-screening. The primary aim of this study is to define a baseline distribution of in-office CCS providers by specialty and the race/ethnicity and age of those screened.

METHODS: We extracted electronic health record data (Truveta- multiple health systems in 34 states) of individuals eligible for CCS aged 21-65, documented between January 1, 2017-December 31, 2022. Those with a hysterectomy before 2017, had any gynecological cancer at any time, or had evidence of CCS after the hysterectomy, except if there was a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3) disease were excluded. We reported the total number of CCS and colposcopies per eligible patient and the specialty of the performing clinician (medical taxonomy).

RESULTS: Among the 2,439,331 individuals included in the study, the average age was 42.9 (SD 11.7). There were 3,412,148 CCSs linked with one of three provider specialties: obstetrics & gynecology (OG), family medicine (FM), and general internal medicine (GIM). OG provided less than half of all CCS, dropping to 31.6% of those 50-65. While only 70.5% (1,718,914) of the population received at least one CCS during the study, the mean CCS per patient was 2.6 (SD 2.7). The rate of colposcopy after a CCS was 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Family and Internal Medicine clinicians provide the majority of CCS in the US (61.9 %), particularly for people aged 50-65 (68.4%), when cervical cancer risk is the highest.

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire