Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Primary Care: Evidence-based Practice

J. F. Pagel
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2007, 20 (4) 392-398; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.04.060201
J. F. Pagel
MS, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This paper presents data evidence supporting the value of diagnosing and treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in reducing morbidity and mortality, improving comorbid disease processes, and improving patient quality of life. These data are derived from a PubMed-based meta-analysis of recent cost effectiveness, standards of practice, and epidemiological studies of OSA, which are ranked using a hierarchical strength of recommendation taxonomy. Cost and health care utilization data have been calculated for OSA and hypersomnolence as well as for diagnostic testing. Strong evidence (which is indicated by a strength of recommendation rating of “A”) exists for the association of adult OSA with obesity, daytime sleepiness, hypertension, and motor vehicular accidents. Strong evidence also exists for requiring full-night or split-night attended polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis and treatment of adult OSA and for patients with systolic or diastolic heart failure not responding to optimal medical management. Good evidence (B) exists for the association of adult OSA with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cerebral vascular accidents, metabolic syndrome, and increased mortality. Good evidence also exists to indicate that the nonattended PSG can be used to diagnose sleep breathing disorders, that autotitration systems can be used to titrate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, and that the multiple sleep latency test can be used in the assessment of daytime sleepiness.

This year the field of sleep medicine becomes a fully accredited American Medical Association subspecialty and an area of potential subspecialization for family physicians interested in a Certificate of Added Qualification (CAQ) in sleep medicine. The field of sleep medicine has shown remarkable growth in the last decades. The number of board-certified sleep physicians have grown from <500 to >3000 in the last 15 years. Yet the overwhelming majority of people who suffer from disorders of sleep and wakefulness are undiagnosed and untreated. The field is relatively new, with few physicians having expertise or training in the area because sleep medicine is not regularly taught in medical schools or in physician training programs. Many practicing physicians complete training without a clear understanding of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the most physiologically disruptive and dangerous of the sleep-related diseases (Table 1).1 Most patients with sleep disturbance receive their medical care in the primary care setting. Life stressors, concomitant illness, and family and social structure can precipitate sleep complaints. The primary care physician often has a more complete knowledge of these factors than the polysomnographic-oriented sub-specialist. This paper presents evidence data documenting the importance of the diagnosis and treatment of OSA in reducing morbidity and mortality, improving comorbid disease processes, and improving patient quality of life in the primary care setting. These data are derived from a PubMed-based meta-analysis of recent cost effectiveness, standards of practice, and epidemiologic studies of OSA, which are ranked using a hierarchical strength of recommendation taxonomy (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Diagnostic Criteria for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Evidence-based Medicine Ratings Based on Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy2

OSA—The Clinical Spectrum

Each of us spend a third of our lives asleep. Dysfunctions in this basic state lead to declines in quality of life, diminished waking performance, more frequent illness, and increases in both morbidity and mortality. In the medical care setting, sleep disorders are common. Although 30% of the general population report symptoms of sleep disruption, >50% of primary care patients have sleep complaints.3 Despite the high prevalence of sleep disorders in the population and primary care setting, sleep complains are often underaddressed by physicians.

OSA occurs secondary to the obstruction of the airway during sleep, resulting in continued breathing effort with diminished airflow. OSA occurs at a high frequency in the primary care clinic population. It is one of the most physiologic disruptive and dangerous of sleep-related diagnoses, affecting 1 of every 5 adults in some populations.4 As many as 18 million Americans suffer from sleep apnea. It is more common among men and those who snore, are overweight, have high blood pressure, or have physical abnormalities in their upper airways.4,5 General population studies suggest that snoring and daytime sleepiness are present in at least 4.1% of people over 40 years of age, with associated apnea diagnosed and treated in only 0.6% of this population.6

A large multicenter trial called the Sleep Heart Health Study has been designed to study the prospective effects of OSA on a large population included in previously developed cardiovascular studies (6440 men and women over 40 years of age).5 Cross-section analysis data from this study has emphasized the significant contribution of OSA to pulmonary, cardiac, endocrine, and cognitive disease.7–10 Prospective data from this study will address these factors as well as the morbidity, comorbidity, and mortality associated with OSA that have been demonstrated in multiple retrospective studies.

Of the sleep disorders, OSA is the best studied from a cost-effect, epidemiologic, and evidence-based perspective. The associated morbidity, mortality, comorbidities, and quality of life effects are well researched and described. Adult OSA has a long-term and clear association with obesity and daytime cognitive impairment that includes daytime sleepiness.5,7,11 Daytime sleepiness has been shown to lead to an increase in motor vehicular accidents in untreated OSA patients. OSA severity correlates in part with the number of respiratory events per hour. This is generally reported as the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), which includes the total of the number of apneas (events of breathing cessation >10 seconds) and hypopneas (>30% decline in breathing effort coupled with >4% SaO2 desaturation and/or arousal) per hour. Subjects with an AHI >10 have a 6.3-fold increased risk of having a traffic accident compared with 152 case-matched control with AHI <10.12 Patients with moderate to severe OSA (AHI >34) have a 15-fold increased risk of having a motor vehicle accident.13 Recent epidemiologic studies that have cross-matched sleep apnea evaluation with long-term prospective cardiovascular risk studies have served to point out the consistent and strong association between OSA and essential hypertension. Odds of hypertension increases with increasing severity of apnea in a graded dose–response fashion with an odds ratio of 1.27 for hypertension in the group with AHI >30 versus the nonapnic group with an AHI of <5.10,14,15 Research supports the association between OSA and increased mortality, congestive heart failure (both right and left sided), myocardial infarction, and cerebral vascular accidents.16,17 Cross-sectional analysis data from the Sleep Heart Health Study demonstrated the following relative odds ratios for OSA patients: congestive heart failure (2.38), stroke (1.58), and coronary heart disease (1.27).8 Evidence is increasingly clear for the association of adult OSA with diabetes and metabolic syndrome.9,18 Cardiac arrhythmias (bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia) are often seen in polysomnography (PSG) studies of OSA patients; however, the clinical significance and OSA association of these arrhythmias has yet to be fully studied19 (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Evidence-based Associations of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

The pathophysiology and clinical presentation of pediatric OSA differs from that of adult OSA. In pediatric patients, OSA is most clearly associated with poor school performance. In first-graders performing at the bottom 10% percent of grade level, >20% have OSA. Furthermore, the grades of all children who had surgery (tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy) improved, whereas the grades of children who did not have surgery showed no change.20 Studies also support the association of pediatric OSA with failure to thrive, enuresis, and learning disability.22 Studies have been contradictory in addressing the association of pediatric OSA with obesity and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, with strong associations occurring in specific patient populations and not in other clinically defined settings21 (Table 3).

OSA Cost and Health Care Use

The costs of untreated sleep apnea have been addressed in several studies. In 238 consecutive OSA patients studied in 1999, the mean annual medical cost was $2720 greater per patient before diagnosis compared with age-, body mass index-, and gender-matched controls.23 Patients with OSA use health care resources at higher rates than control subjects for years before diagnosis.24 For the 10 years before diagnosis, physician claims for patients eventually diagnosed with OSA are twice ($3972 per patient) that of age-matched controls ($1969 per patient).25 Of all comorbid diagnoses, significantly increased health care use is found for cardiovascular disease and hypertension in OSA patients.19 There was a rise in health care costs each year before diagnosis, with initial data suggesting that after diagnosis, yearly claims were halved. By the time patients were finally diagnosed with sleep apnea, they had already been heavy users of health services for several years.26 In Canada, hospital stays are 1.27 days per patient per year 1 year before OSA diagnosis and 0.53 days per patient per year 1 year after diagnosis. These differences were only seen in those patients adhering to treatment with no difference between patients and controls for nonadherers.27 In pediatric OSA, there are also suggestions for increased health care use with a 226% increase in health care use 1 year before evaluation, more hospital days, more drug use, and more visits to ER, with the severity of OSA correlating directly to total annual cost independent of age.28

Effectiveness of CPAP Therapy for OSA

A meta-analysis of applicable studies demonstrated that consistent evidence exists showing that treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy leads to significant improvement in daytime sleepiness and quality of life measures as well as reduced diastolic and systolic blood pressure.29 In OSA patients, there is reduced hospitalization with cardiovascular and pulmonary disease in OSA patients on nasal CPAP treatment.27,29 CPAP treatment reduces the need for acute hospital admission due to cardiovascular and pulmonary disease in patients with OSA. For the 2 years before and 2 years after CPAP use in CPAP users, 413 hospital days were used before treatment and 54 hospital days were used after treatment. In OSA CPAP nonusers, 137 hospital days were used before treatment and 188 hospital days were used after treatment. This reduction of concomitant health care consumption should be taken into consideration when assessing the cost-benefit evaluation of CPAP therapy.

Hypersomnia

In our modern, fast-paced world, an adequate level of alertness is required for well-being and performance. In a year 2000 United States national survey, 32% of respondents reported daytime sleepiness despite adequate sleep the preceding night.30 This diagnostic category includes a group of diagnoses sharing the primary characteristic of inducing significant daytime sleepiness. These diagnoses have significant affects on waking performance and therefore morbidity and mortality. The National Health and Safety Administration in 1999 estimated that 1.5% of 100,000 police-reported crashes and 4% of all traffic crash fatalities involved drowsiness and fatigue as principal causes. Beyond the personal and social loss associated with these accidents, the National Health and Safety Administration in 1994 estimated cost at $83,000 per fatality, resulting in a total cost of $12.5 billion, with 85% of this cost being from workplace loss and loss of productivity.31

Diagnostic Evaluation of OSA

To diagnosis and manage OSA, sleep physicians routinely use diagnostic tests that require the sleep laboratory for evaluation of the patient. The sleep-related breathing disorders generally require PSG for evaluation. PSG is the recording of multiple physiologic signals during sleep. The standard PSG recording montage includes channels of electroencephalography, electrooculography, and chin electromyography that are required for sleep staging as well as recordings of respiratory effort, airflow, pulse oximetry, snoring, sleep position, electrocardiogram, leg electromyography, and video monitoring. Additional channels are sometimes used including end-tidal or transcutaneous CO2 and additional electroencephalography channels if potential nocturnal seizure disorders are being evaluated. In evaluating the sleep-related breathing disorders, a split-night protocol is often used in which a therapeutic treatment or “titration” portion of the PSG is added after at least 120 minutes of diagnostic sleep time. During the titration, CPAP, Bi-PAP, and oxygen are used in an attempt to eliminate or reduce respiratory events and restore normal sleep. The PSG report is scored by a sleep technologist and interpreted by a sleep medicine physician. The PSG interpretation that the patient receives should include data regarding sleep architecture, respiratory parameters, periodic limb movements, a description of any parasomnia or seizure activity, electrocardiogram abnormalities, and the results of and appropriate setting of any titration attempted during the night of study.

Daytime sleepiness is generally evaluated via multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT) that includes 4 to 5 opportunities to nap in the sleep laboratory after a full night PSG under standard conditions with electroencephalography, electrooculography, and electromyography monitored so that sleep and rapid eye movement sleep onset can be determined. MSLT reports should include average or mean latency to sleep and the number of sleep onset rapid-eye-movement sleep periods recorded (a diagnostic criterion for narcolepsy). The maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) is similar to the MSLT; however, for this procedure, the patient attempts to maintain wakefulness while monitored for appropriate testing periods to assess the patients ability to maintain wakefulness during the day.

Sleep laboratory testing can be expensive, and alternative approaches have been attempted. At this point, however, in-laboratory, full PSG with respiratory titration as required is the most cost-effective approach to evaluation of sleep disorders when required (Table 4). Limited PSGs include fewer recording channels and cannot determine whether the patient is actually asleep during the recording. Full home PSGs are a potential alternative, however, incomplete recordings are obtained in 20% of studies and titration cannot be attempted in the night of study.35,36 Auto-titrating PAP systems have minimal diagnostic capacity and can report inappropriate settings for misdiagnosed patients, for patients with central apneas, and for those with nasal congestion or mouth leaks on CPAP therapy.37 Polysomnographic testing provides a wealth of useful information for the primary care physician involved in the treatment of the patient's sleep disorder. The primary care physician able to understand the data and interpretation from a high-quality PSG will find much information useful in patient care.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Evidence-based Criteria for Sleep Testing for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

SUMMARY

The evidence basis is excellent in supporting the importance the diagnosis and treatment of OSA in adults. Although data exists documenting appropriate approaches to pediatric apnea and hypersomnolence, a greater number of larger and better-designed studies are needed to support both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches (Table 5). The diagnosis and treatment of OSA should be considered as part of the management of diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure—core aspects of primary care medicine. Sleep laboratory testing can be used as an objective insight into the patient's pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, endocrine, cognitive, and psychiatric status. The family physician with training in sleep and an understanding of appropriately used testing procedures can use current evidence based knowledge in the field to provide high-quality sleep medicine in a primary care setting.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Summary of Evidence Based on Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: The author owns $10,000 in ResMed and Respironics stocks. The author serves on the Sleepworks Medical Advisory Board.

  • Received for publication November 20, 2006.
  • Revision received February 19, 2007.
  • Accepted for publication March 7, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual. 2nd ed. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2005. p. 51–5.
  2. ↵
    Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004; 69: 549–57.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    National Institutes of Health State of the Science Conference Statement. Bethesda, MD; 2005 Aug 18.
  4. ↵
    Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165(9): 1217–39.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Young T, Shahar E, Nieto F, et al. Predictors of sleep-disordered breathing in community-dwelling adults: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162(8): 893–900.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Kapur V, Strohl K, Redline S, Iber C, Oconnor G, Nieto J. Underdiagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome in U.S. Communities. Sleep Breath 2002; 6(2): 49–54.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Quan S, Wright R, Baldwin C, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and neurocognitive function in the Sleep Heart Health Study. Sleep Med 2006; 7(6): 498–507.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Shahar E, Whitney C, Redline S, et al. Sleep disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: cross sectional results of the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163(1): 19–25.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Punjabi N, Shahar E, Redine S, Gottlieb D, Givelber R, Resnick H. Sleep-disordered breathing, glucose intolerance and insulin resistance: the Sleep Hearth Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160: 521–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Nieto F, Young T, Lind B, et al. Association of sleep disordered breathing, sleep apnea and hypertension in a large community based study. JAMA 2000; 238: 1829–36.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Gami AS, Caples SM, Somers VK. Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003; 32(4): 869–94.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    Teran-Santos J, Jimenez-Gomez A, Cordero-Guevara J. The association between sleep apnea and the risk of traffic accidents. Cooperative Group Burgos-Santander. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 Suppl 11: 847–51.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Horstmann S, Hess C, Bassetti C, Gugger M, Mathis J. Sleepiness-related accidents in sleep apnea patients. Sleep 2000; 23(3): 383–9.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Richert A, Ansarin K, and Baran AS. Sleep apnea and hypertension: pathophysiologic mechanisms. Semin Nephrol 2002; 22(1): 71–7.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Smith R, Ronald J, Delaive K, Walld R, Manfreda J, Kryger M. What are obstructive sleep apnea patients being treated for prior to this diagnosis? Chest 2002; 121: 164–172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Wolk R, Shamsuzzaman AS, Somers VK. Obesity, sleep apnea, and hypertension. Hypertension 2003; 42(6): 1067–74.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Kenchaiah S, Narula J, Vasan RS. Risk factors for heart failure. Med Clin North Am 2004; 88(5): 1145–72.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Vgontzas AN, Bixler EO, and Chrousos GP. Metabolic disturbances in obesity versus sleep apnea: the importance of visceral obesity and insulin resistance. J Intern Med 2003; 254(1): 32–44.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Verrier R, Josephson M. Cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death during sleep. In: Lee-Chiong T, editor. Sleep: a comprehensive handbook. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss; 2006. p. 727–32.
  20. ↵
    Gozal D. Sleep-disordered breathing and school performance in children. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 616–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Pagel JF, Snyder S, Dawson D. Obstructive sleep apnea in sleepy pediatric psychiatry clinic patients: polysomnographic and clinical correlates. Sleep Breath 2004; 8(3): 125–31.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Chervin R, Archbold K, Panachi P, Pituch K. Sleep problems seldom addressed at two general pediatric clinics. Pediatrics 2001; 107(6): 1375–80.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Kapur V, Blough DK, Sandblom RE, et al. The medical cost of undiagnosed sleep apnea. Sleep 1999; 22 Suppl 6: 749.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Banno K, Manfreda J, Walld R, Delaivie K, Kryger M. Healthcare utilization in women with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome two years after diagnosis and treatment. Sleep 2006; 29(10): 1307–11.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Ronald J, Delaive K, Roos L, Manfreda J, Bahammam A, Kryger M. Health care utilization in the 10 years prior to diagnosis in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients. Sleep 1999; 22(2): 225–235.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Bahammam A, Delaive K, Ronald J, Manfreda J, Roos L, Kryger MH. Health care utilization in males with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome two years after diagnosis and treatment. Sleep 1999; 22 Suppl 6: 740–7.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Peker Y, Hedner J, Johansson A, Bende M. Reduced hospitalization with cardiovascular and pulmonary disease in obstructive sleep apnea patients on nasal CPAP treatment. Sleep 1997; 20: 645–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Tarasiuk A, Simon T, Tal A, Reuveni H. Adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome reduces health care utilization. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 68–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Giles T, Lasserson T, Smith B, White J, Wright J, Cates C. Continous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006(1); CD001106.
  30. ↵
    Albarrak M, Banno K, Sabbagh A, Delaivie K, Walld R, Manfreda J, Kryger M. Utilization of healthcare resources in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 5 year follow-up study in men using C-pap. Sleep 2005; 28(10): 1306–11.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    National Sleep Foundation. Sleepiness in America: a national survey of US adults. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization; 1997.
  32. Chesson AL, Ferber RA, Fry JM, et al. The indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Sleep 1997; 20: 423–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. Chesson A, Ferber R, Fry J, et al. Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Polysomnography Task Force, American Sleep Disorders Association Standards of Practice Committee. Sleep 1997; 20(6): 406–22.
    OpenUrl
  34. Kushida CA, Littner MR, Hirshkowitz M, et al. Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep 2006; 29(3): 375–80.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    Ferber R, Millman R, Coppola M, et al. Portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. ASDA standards of practice. Sleep 1994; 17(4): 378–9.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Thorpy M, Chesson A, Ferber R, et al. Practice parameters for the use of portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep 1994; 17(4): 372–7.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Littner M, Hirshkowitz M, Davila D, et al. Practice parameters for the use of auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure devices for titrating pressures and treating adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine report. Sleep 2002; 25(2): 143–7.
    OpenUrl
  38. Littner MR, Kushida C, Wise M, et al. Practice parameters for clinical use of the multiple sleep latency test and the maintenance of wakefulness test. Sleep 2005; 28(1): 113–21.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 4
July-August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Primary Care: Evidence-based Practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Primary Care: Evidence-based Practice
J. F. Pagel
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2007, 20 (4) 392-398; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.04.060201

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Primary Care: Evidence-based Practice
J. F. Pagel
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2007, 20 (4) 392-398; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.04.060201
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • OSA—The Clinical Spectrum
    • OSA Cost and Health Care Use
    • Effectiveness of CPAP Therapy for OSA
    • Hypersomnia
    • Diagnostic Evaluation of OSA
    • SUMMARY
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Social consequences of sleep disordered breathing on patients and their partners: a controlled national study
  • Identification by Primary Care Clinicians of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A practice-based research network (PBRN) study
  • Nurse-led care was non-inferior to physician-directed care in symptomatic moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire