Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

ABFM Journal Club's Focus on Critical Appraisal of Full Research Articles Is Misplaced

Kenneth W. Lin, Henry C. Barry, Mark H. Ebell, Roland Grad, Allen F. Shaughnessy, Jay Siwek and David C. Slawson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2021, 34 (2) 452-453; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200520
Kenneth W. Lin
Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, 2245 East 1700 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, and
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Kenneth.Lin@georgetown.edu
Henry C. Barry
Department of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark H. Ebell
University of Georgia College of Public Health
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Grad
McGill University, Department of Family Medicine
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen F. Shaughnessy
Tufts University
PharmD, MMedEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay Siwek
Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Slawson
Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: We read with interest the commentary by Drs. Quan and Newton describing the plan of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) to develop a Journal Club as an optional continuing certification activity.1 They propose to have a national committee select 100 high-quality, potentially practice-changing research articles relevant to family medicine each year and to require Journal Club participants to read the full text of an article and correctly answer 4 multiple-choice questions to earn credit.

Having collectively taught thousands of medical and graduate students how to critically appraise the medical literature, we nonetheless think that it is unrealistic to expect most busy clinicians to learn or even want to learn how to critically appraise full research articles to inform their clinical practices. Rather than trying to stay current by evaluating individual studies, family physicians should pursue Information Mastery,2,3 which emphasizes selecting good sources of preappraised patient-oriented evidence that matters (POEMs) for foraging (keeping up with new information) and hunting (quickly accessing information at the point of care) purposes.4

Although the authors suggest that having Journal Club participants read full research articles will improve shared decision making and personalized care, we are not aware of any empiric evidence or data from the other Boards to support this assumption.5 In fact, this approach could create inappropriate expectations and become counterproductive. We and others have found that attempting to teach critical appraisal skills to clinicians results in them concluding (correctly) that it is too time-consuming and difficult to do in the rush of everyday life; instead, they often revert back to relying on questionable information from easily accessible sources (eg, pharmaceutical companies) and “key opinion leaders” with financial conflicts of interest.6

As proposed, the ABFM Journal Club will likely self-select a small group of family physicians who are interested and/or have extra time for this intensive activity but will have a minimal impact on the critical thinking and information management skills of the specialty as a whole.

Why can't there be 2 options? There could be a “deep dive” option for those who want to learn to critically evaluate articles as well as a more inclusive option for those who prefer summaries of preappraised POEMs with key take-home points. Several of us have been writing approximately 250 POEMs per year and publishing many of them in family medicine journals for the past 20 years.7 In a research study, Canadian family physicians who were given access to an electronic knowledge resource including POEMs reported that their searches resulted in health benefits for their patients.8 So, if the Board's goal is to enhance skills that actually improve practice outcomes, they could adopt a similar approach of providing physicians ongoing access to preappraised evidence and teaching information mastery. This proven model is more user friendly than one that tries to teach critical appraisal of individual studies, an approach that we think falls short in terms of relevance and the work involved.2

We agree with Drs. Quan and Newton that family medicine can and should lead the way to better patient care with better information. We disagree, however, that focusing on the appraisal of original research is the best or singular path to realize that goal.

Notes

  • Conflicts of interest: HCB, MHE, DCS, and AFS are paid as editorial consultants by Wiley-Blackwell to write the POEMs. MHE and KWL are paid by Wiley-Blackwell to edit the Essential Evidence Plus medical reference. HCB, MHE, DCS, AFS, and RG have all participated in research projects that evaluate the inter-rater reliability and impact of POEMs on practice.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/34/2/452.full.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Quan MA,
    2. Newton WP
    . Helping family physicians keep up to date: a next step in the pursuit of mastery. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:S24–S27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Slawson DC,
    2. Shaughnessy AF,
    3. Bennett JH
    . Becoming a medical information master: feeling good about not knowing everything. J Fam Pract 1994;38:505–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sokol RG,
    2. Slawson DC,
    3. Shaughnessy AF
    . Teaching evidence-based medicine application: transformative concepts of information mastery that foster evidence-informed decision-making. BMJ Evid Based Med 2019;24:149–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Slawson DC,
    2. Shaughnessy AF
    . Teaching evidence-based medicine: should we be teaching information management instead? Acad Med 2005;80:685–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Harris J,
    2. Kearley K,
    3. Heneghan C,
    4. et al
    . Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16. Med Teach 2011;33:9–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jung J,
    2. Fugh-Berman A
    . Marketing messages in continuing medical education (CME) on binge-eating disorder (BED). J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:240–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Barry HC,
    3. Shaughnessy AF,
    4. Slawson DC,
    5. Kulkarni N,
    6. Speer L
    . Top 20 POEMs of the past 20 years: a survey of practice-changing research for family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2018;16:436–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pluye P,
    2. Grad RM,
    3. Johnson-Lafleur J,
    4. et al
    . Number needed to benefit from information (NNBI): proposal from a mixed methods research study with practicing family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:559–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 34 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 34, Issue 2
March/April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ABFM Journal Club's Focus on Critical Appraisal of Full Research Articles Is Misplaced
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
ABFM Journal Club's Focus on Critical Appraisal of Full Research Articles Is Misplaced
Kenneth W. Lin, Henry C. Barry, Mark H. Ebell, Roland Grad, Allen F. Shaughnessy, Jay Siwek, David C. Slawson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2021, 34 (2) 452-453; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200520

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
ABFM Journal Club's Focus on Critical Appraisal of Full Research Articles Is Misplaced
Kenneth W. Lin, Henry C. Barry, Mark H. Ebell, Roland Grad, Allen F. Shaughnessy, Jay Siwek, David C. Slawson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2021, 34 (2) 452-453; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200520
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire