Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
EditorialEditors' Note

Keeping Patients at the Center of Family Medicine Scholarship

Dean A. Seehusen, Marjorie A. Bowman and Christy J. W. Ledford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2021, 34 (2) 249-250; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.210013
Dean A. Seehusen
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marjorie A. Bowman
MD, MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christy J. W. Ledford
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In addition to the collection of veterans' health articles, this edition of the journal contains a wide range of family medicine research reports, commentaries, clinical reviews, and scholarly observations. These articles clearly exemplify a key strength of family medicine scholarship: the focus is on our patients. Two articles look at modern care of patients with venous thromboembolic disease—the first on acute management and the second on long-term care. Two other articles explore the role of pharmacists in an interdisciplinary team. A clever use of big databases provides a thought-provoking answer about the long-term health of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Three articles give us possible glimpses into the future of family medicine, exploring a potential payment reform model, suggesting an alternative approach to cancer screening guideline development, and considering how family physicians remain relevant in the technology-laden medical world of tomorrow.

A strength of family medicine scholarship is its focus on patients and their needs. Although the range of scholarship in this issue of the journal is broad, and the topics span the range of medical practice, the common aim is improved patient care.

Venous thromboembolic disease is commonly seen by family physicians. Cuomo et al1 provide a detailed overview of the processes and procedures of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT). The PERT concept is almost a decade old now, and this review summarizes the typical workflow of these teams. For an institution considering creating its own PERT, this article serves as an exemplar. In a complementary clinical review, Fernandez et al2 provide an update on the long-term care of patients with a history of venous thromboembolism.

Pharmacists are increasingly recognized as part of the primary care interdisciplinary team. Funk et al3 make a strong argument that pharmacists contribute to Starfield's4 4 Cs through chronic care management programs. Should pharmacists also be providing vaccines to patients? A survey of more than 600 family physicians and internists showed that most embrace the role of pharmacists providing adults with needed vaccinations but most also have serious concerns about how this is implemented in practice.5

Calls for primary care payment reform have been intensifying for years. In a thoughtful and insightful article, Gold et al6 offer concrete suggestions for a way forward. Their analysis, based on existing data, is well worth the read. Shaughnessy et al7 envision a future in which family physicians continue to be highly relevant for patients by working collaboratively with emerging technology, increasing interconnectedness, and using big data. Not surprisingly, the authors suggest that keeping individual patients, along with their individual life situations, as the focal point of medical decisions will be instrumental to the specialty's future.

It is easy to oversimplify the case for cancer screening. However, we all know that every action in medicine has potential risks. Bradley et al8 present a compelling argument for evaluating the pros and cons of screening in a more balanced manner and focusing on the perspective of patients. Could citizen juries enrich the process of creating cancer screening guidelines?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become common in community dwelling populations. Is colonization with MRSA associated with long-term health effects? By linking National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and National Death Index data, Mainous et al9 answer this question for middle-aged and older adults. Their findings raise questions about the management of MRSA colonization.

Two articles explore the evolution of the day-to-day practice of family medicine. The national trend toward consolidation of medical practices has been associated with a steady decline in the number of family physicians working in small and solo practices, even in rural areas. Jetty et al10 report details of this trend from 2014 to 2018. How has the breakdown of office visits to family physicians changed throughout the past 35 years? What proportion of visits are for acute concerns? Chronic disease management? Preventive services? Bensken et al11 studied this breakdown and were surprised by what they found.

Rajaee and Patel12 explored US adults' hospital experiences with chaplains. Their findings suggest increasing such services in American hospitals could benefit patients. Group visits have the advantage of normalizing clinical conditions for patients and allowing providers to present important information in a standardized format. Kogan et al13 report on providers' perspectives on using group visits to address advanced care planning in a population of patients with heart failure.

Margarita Burn is not as fun, or as rare, as it may sound. Understanding the pathophysiology of this rash can help family physicians make the diagnosis.14 Davis15 shares a personal story to remind us that to be there for our patients, we also need to care for ourselves.

Notes

  • Conflicts of interest: The authors are editors of the JABFM.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/34/2/249.full.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cuomo JR,
    2. Arora V,
    3. Wilkins T
    . Management of acute pulmonary embolism with a pulmonary embolism response team. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:402–408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fernandes TM,
    2. Kanwar M,
    3. White RH
    . Management of patients with venous thromboembolism after the initial treatment period. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:409–419.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Funk KA,
    2. Sorge LA,
    3. Bazemore AW,
    4. Sorensen TD,
    5. Roth MT,
    6. Carroll JK
    . How comprehensive medication management contributes to foundational elements of primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:420–423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Starfield B
    . Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
  5. 5.↵
    1. MacBrayne CE,
    2. Hurley LP,
    3. O'Leary ST,
    4. et al
    . Primary care physicians' perspective on pharmacists delivering vaccines to adults. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:392–397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gold SB,
    2. Green LA,
    3. Westfall JM
    . Heeding the call for urgent primary care payment reform: what do we know about how to get started? J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:424–429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Shaughnessy AF,
    2. Slawson DC,
    3. Duggan AP
    . “Alexa, can you be my family medicine doctor?” The future of family medicine in the coming techno-world. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:430–434.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bradley SH,
    2. Thompson MJ,
    3. Nicholson BD
    . Ensuring informed decision-making for cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:435–438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mainous AG,
    2. Rooks BJ,
    3. Carek PJ
    . Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and mortality risk among community adults aged 40–85. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:439–441.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jetty A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Jabbarpour Y
    . Proportion of family physicians in solo and small practices is on the decline. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:266–267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bensken WP,
    2. Dong W,
    3. Gullett H,
    4. Etz RS,
    5. Stange KC
    . Changing reasons for visiting primary care over a 35-year period. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:442–448.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rajaee G,
    2. Patel MR
    . Awareness and preferences for health care chaplaincy services among U.S. adults. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:368–374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kogan AC,
    2. Kraus K,
    3. Olsen B,
    4. Bandini JI,
    5. Ahluwalia SC
    . Clinician perspectives on group visits for advance care planning among caregivers and older adult patients with heart failure. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:375–386.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Maniam G,
    2. Light KM,
    3. Wilson J
    . Margarita burn: recognition and treatment of phytophotodermatitis. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:398–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Davis JW
    . Medicine in mind, healing at heart: big data and its limits in compassionate care. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:449–451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 34 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 34, Issue 2
March/April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Keeping Patients at the Center of Family Medicine Scholarship
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Keeping Patients at the Center of Family Medicine Scholarship
Dean A. Seehusen, Marjorie A. Bowman, Christy J. W. Ledford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2021, 34 (2) 249-250; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.210013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Keeping Patients at the Center of Family Medicine Scholarship
Dean A. Seehusen, Marjorie A. Bowman, Christy J. W. Ledford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2021, 34 (2) 249-250; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.210013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Research on the Social Context of Medicine and the Modern Family Physician
  • Improving Health Through Family Medicine: New Opportunities, Missed Opportunities
  • Clinically Relevant Family Medicine Research: Board Certification Updates
Show more Editors' Note

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire