Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleResearch Letter

Perspectives on Dermoscopy in the Primary Care Setting

Natalie M. Williams, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Elizabeth Seiverling, Richard Usatine, Darren Tsang and Natalia Jaimes
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2020, 33 (6) 1022-1024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200238
Natalie M. Williams
From the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashfaq A. Marghoob
From the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Seiverling
From the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Usatine
From the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren Tsang
From the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia Jaimes
From the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: Dermoscopy is a noninvasive, in vivo imaging technique that allows for the visualization of subsurface skin structures. In recent years, several education interventions have incorporated dermoscopy in the primary care setting to improve skin cancer detection. We aim to describe the perspectives, attitudes, and interest of primary care physicians (PCPs) regarding dermoscopy.

Methods: PCPs associated with academic institutions completed an anonymous survey emailed to faculty and resident listservs. The survey consisted of 23 questions related to dermoscopy.

Results: A total of 156 PCPs completed the questionnaire. Few PCPs reported having access to a dermatoscope (16%), using it regularly (9%), or having received training (15%). The most common reasons for not using a dermatoscope were the lack of access to the device (85%), followed by the lack of training (76%). However, the majority view dermoscopy as a valuable tool in primary care and are interested in receiving training (87%), particularly with a hands-on approach.

Conclusion: Our sample of PCPs in the United States showed that although few use dermoscopy, most perceive it as a useful tool, particularly family medicine physicians. The main reported barriers preventing its use included the lack of training and poor access to dermatoscopes. The vast majority of PCPs in our sample want to be trained in dermoscopy, thereby providing an opportunity for educational initiatives that take into account the barriers and preferred learning strategies.

  • Dermoscopy
  • Family Physicians
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Primary Health Care
  • Skin Cancer
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Introduction

Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a critical role in health care. PCPs encounter a variety of dermatologic diseases, including skin cancer. As skin cancer continues to be a public health problem, PCPs are imperative to early detection. Several educational interventions provided to PCPs aim to improve skin cancer detection by incorporating dermoscopy.

Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that allows for the visualization of subsurface skin structures. Studies have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer when used by PCPs.1 In addition, mastery-learning courses in dermoscopy can improve diagnostic accuracy and increase physician confidence. As only 8% of PCPs in the United States use dermoscopy,2 there is opportunity to increase and promote its practice. However, before embarking on dermoscopy training initiatives, it is important to understand the views of PCPs in learning and implementing this tool.

Methods

In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, academic PCPs (family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics) associated with the University of Miami and Tufts University completed an anonymous survey emailed to faculty and resident listservs. Summary statistics and comparative analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software 9.4 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC). Categorical variables were analyzed using a Pearson’s χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test. All tests were 2-tailed and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Overall, 156 PCPs completed the questionnaire (Table 1). Over half of the respondents were residents. Of the participants, 16% reported having access to a dermatoscope, with only 9% regularly using it. Compared with residents, attendings were more likely to have access to a dermatoscope (27% vs 6%, P = .0008) and to use it in their clinical practice (17% vs 1%, P = .0004). A minority of respondents (15%) had received prior training in dermoscopy, which was significantly associated with both dermatoscope access and use (P < .0001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Participant Demographics and Career Information

Although the response rate was low (156/506, 31%), most PCPs view dermoscopy as a valuable tool in primary care, with 76% rating it as at least moderately important (Table 2). The most common reason for not using dermoscopy was the lack of access (85%), followed by lack of training (76%). The majority were interested in receiving dermoscopy training and supported the implementation of courses into their respective residencies. Family medicine physicians were significantly more likely to perceive dermoscopy as valuable (P < .002), use dermoscopy (P = .0008), receive training (P = .0008), and express interest in training (P = .0364) compared with other specialties.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Participant Perspectives Regarding Dermoscopy

When questioned regarding preferred methods of dermoscopy education, the most popular choice was hands-on training (41%) followed by self study (25%) using a textbook or application. Participants suggested an average of 4- to 6-hour courses spanned over 2 to 3 days for hands-on or in-person trainings. For online videos, respondents recommended a 2- to 3-hour course spanned over 3 to 4 sessions.

Discussion

Although not many PCPs use dermoscopy, most perceive it as a useful tool, particularly family medicine physicians. The main barriers preventing its use include the lack of training and access to dermatoscopes. The cost of these devices, which range between $300 and $1500, was not commonly reported as a barrier to their implementation in practice. PCPs would prefer hands-on training, which aligns with the preferences of dermatology residents.3 Since clinical trainings may not be feasible for all PCPs, it is important to note that there are several online resources for the identification of skin cancer (that is, https://dermoscopedia.org/, Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm [TADA]4). Studies evaluating TADA, which offers novice dermoscopists a starting point when approaching lesions of concern, were previously published in this journal.5

The major limitation of the study is the low response rate, which may be an indirect representation of the lack of interest but is not unexpected with an anonymous survey sent to the listserv of busy physicians. However, understanding the barriers and preferred learning strategies provides valuable information to guide educational initiatives and increase dermoscopy use among PCPs.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/33/6/1022.full.

  • Received for publication May 18, 2020.
  • Revision received June 24, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication July 8, 2020.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Secker LJ,
    2. Buis PA,
    3. Bergman W,
    4. Kukutsch NA
    . Effect of a dermoscopy training course on the accuracy of primary care physicians in diagnosing pigmented lesions. Acta Derm Venereol 2017;97:263–5.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Morris JB,
    2. Alfonso SV,
    3. Hernandez N,
    4. Fernández MI
    . Examining the factors associated with past and present dermoscopy use among family physicians. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017;7:63–70.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chen YA,
    2. Rill J,
    3. Seiverling EV
    . Analysis of dermoscopy teaching modalities in United States dermatology residency programs. Dermatol Pract Concept 2017;7:38–43.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jaimes N,
    2. Marghoob AA
    . Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;82:1551–2.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Seiverling EV,
    2. Ahrns HT,
    3. Greene A,
    4. et al
    . Teaching benign skin lesions as a strategy to improve the Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:96–102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 6
November-December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perspectives on Dermoscopy in the Primary Care Setting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Perspectives on Dermoscopy in the Primary Care Setting
Natalie M. Williams, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Elizabeth Seiverling, Richard Usatine, Darren Tsang, Natalia Jaimes
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2020, 33 (6) 1022-1024; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200238

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Perspectives on Dermoscopy in the Primary Care Setting
Natalie M. Williams, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Elizabeth Seiverling, Richard Usatine, Darren Tsang, Natalia Jaimes
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2020, 33 (6) 1022-1024; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200238
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Must-Read Family Medicine Research--Glucosamine/Chondroitin Supplements and Mortality, Telomere Length and the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Reducing Opioid Use, and More
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing of Certification Stage Completion Associated with Subsequent Certification Exam Outcomes Among Board-Certified Family Physicians
  • Interpersonal Continuity of Care May Help Delay Progression to Type 2 Diabetes
  • Impact of Point of Care Hemoglobin A1c Testing on Time to Therapeutic Intervention
Show more Research Letter

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Dermoscopy
  • Family Physicians
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Primary Health Care
  • Skin Cancer
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire