Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Re: New Allopathic Medical Schools Train Fewer Family Physicians than Older Ones

Daniel M. Avery and Richard H. Streiffer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2020, 33 (1) 154-155; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190343
Daniel M. Avery Jr
Department of Community Medicine & Population Health, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: davery@ua.edu
Richard H. Streiffer
Department of Family, Internal and Rural Medicine, College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: Despite years of recommendations for correcting the shortage of primary care physicians, the struggle to coax students into primary care remains.1,2 Creation of new medical schools has not been the answer, as reported by Beachler et al.3 Drowos4 wisely calls on leaders to consider why certain medical schools “are successful at recruiting medical students into family medicine…”; We think we know—it is more about mission and culture than strategy.

The University of Alabama's College of Community Health Sciences (CCHS) has provided clinical year medical education as the Tuscaloosa Regional Campus (TRC) of the University of Alabama School of Medicine (UASOM) since 1972. Founding Dean, William R. Willard, MD, of the “Willard Report,”5 shaped the College in response to a desperate call for family physicians, infusing a deeply held sense of mission from which we have not strayed.

Many medical schools report optimistic though misleading data on its graduates' match into primary care,6 failing to adjust for the attrition of up to 80% of residents into subspecialties, particularly in internal medicine and pediatrics.7 What distinguishes our data are that we have been able to track all 850 UASOM graduates who trained at the TRC over 4 decades to verify their practice location and specialty.

Some 440 graduates (52%) who trained at the TRC between 1974 and 2015 matched into primary care fields. Of these, 345 (47%) practiced primary care for a “retention in primary care” rate of 78%. Retention was highest for those who trained in Family Medicine (98%), followed by Pediatrics (71%), Internal Medicine (62%), then Internal Medicine/Pediatrics (36%). This is the highest retention rate for the 3 campuses of UASOM, which trained students during this time frame (Birmingham rate, 45%; Huntsville rate, 52%). Of note, retention rates for General Internal Medicine (TRC, 62%; Birmingham, 29%; Huntsville, 24%), and for General Pediatrics (TRC, 71%; Birmingham, 59%; Huntsville, 52%), suggests a broad effect that is not specialty specific.

The authors have experienced this sense of mission over our own 40 years of personal history with CCHS. The majority of CCHS deans have been primary care physicians; graduate medical education at CCHS is limited to Family Medicine; research is focused on community and rural issues and prematriculation, rural and minority pipeline programs emphasize primary care and service to rural communities. Learners have the breadth, role, ability and collaborative style of the generalist reinforced as they work with all CCHS faculty of all specialties.

The late management sage, Peter Drucker, is said to have articulated that culture eats strategy for breakfast. Forty years of data from one of the country's older regional campuses supports that notion.

Notes

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/33/1/157.full.

  • The above letter was referred to the authors of the article in question, who declined to respond.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rabinowitz HK,
    2. Diamond JJ,
    3. Markham FW,
    4. Paynter NP
    . Critical factors for designing programs to increase the supply and retention of rural primary care physicians. JAMA 2001;286:1041–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Council on Graduate Medical Education. Advancing primary care, twentieth report, advancing primary care, Rockville, MD, December, 2010. Available from: https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/bhpradvosoty/cogme/Reports/twentiethreport.pdf. Accessed on March 17, 2017.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Beachler B,
    2. Jabbarpour Y,
    3. Kamerow DB,
    4. et al
    . New allopathic medical schools train fewer family physicians than older ones. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:653–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Drowos J
    . New allopathic medical schools and family physicians. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:651–2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    American Medical Association. Ad hoc committee on education for family practice. Meeting the challenge for family practice; report. American Medical Association; 1966.
  6. 6.↵
    The “dean's lie” about medical school primary care production. Monday, April 4, 2011. Available from: https://futureoffamilymedicine.blogspot.com/2011/04/deans-lie-about-medical-school-primary.html. Accessed September 12, 2019.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Inglehart JK
    . Health reform, primary care, and graduate medical education. N Engl J Med 2013;363:584–90.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 1
January-February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Re: New Allopathic Medical Schools Train Fewer Family Physicians than Older Ones
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Re: New Allopathic Medical Schools Train Fewer Family Physicians than Older Ones
Daniel M. Avery, Richard H. Streiffer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2020, 33 (1) 154-155; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190343

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Re: New Allopathic Medical Schools Train Fewer Family Physicians than Older Ones
Daniel M. Avery, Richard H. Streiffer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2020, 33 (1) 154-155; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190343
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire