Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

The Numbers Quandary in Family Medicine Obstetrics

Anne Worth
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2018, 31 (1) 167-168; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170378
Anne Worth
Riverside Methodist Hospital Family Medicine Residency Columbus, OH
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anne.worth@ohiohealth.com
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: The article “Intention Versus Reality: Family Medicine Residency Graduates' Intention to Practice Obstetrics” by Barreto et al1 illustrates the decline of obstetrics in family medicine. The accompanying editorial by Rayburn2 mentions a key barrier to this scope of practice: the lack of standardized pedagogy and supporting research to ensure quality care provided by family medicine obstetric physicians. The question becomes not only whether a sufficient number of family medicine physicians practice obstetrics, but whether our training and standards are rigorous enough to deliver quality care in the face of rising maternal morbidity and mortality.3

Regrettably, obstetric training in family medicine is inconsistently measured and inconsistently required. Several studies have concluded that family medicine physicians can deliver quality care, comparable to that provided by obstetricians, but unfortunately these studies are outdated, based in other countries, or limited to a few regional medical centers.4⇓⇓–7 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recently lowered the number of deliveries that family medicine graduates have to complete in order to graduate from residency. The number of babies that family physicians deliver declines throughout the course of their careers, as does the percentage of physicians who choose to recertify.1,8 Fellowship programs vary widely regarding curriculum and graduation requirements.9 If obstetric practice is to survive in family medicine, we must consider the forces driving these decisions as we move forward.

Family medicine physicians who provide obstetric care offer a valuable service, especially in underserved rural areas of the United States. To align our outcomes with our intentions, however, we are faced with the option of adopting standardized and studied practices or abandoning obstetrics all together. The resolve of family medicine physicians to continue obstetric practice could be strengthened with specialized tracks in residency programs followed by standardized fellowships with consistent requirements. Rigorous studies of the outcomes of deliveries by family medicine physicians would permit self-evaluation and improvements in training. Insistence on quality and robust preparation must supersede concerns about the numbers of family physicians practicing obstetrics. The number of family medicine obstetricians may continue to decrease, but let them be the few and the proud rather than the many and the untested—our patients deserve nothing less.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks to Jennifer Middleton MD, MPH, FAAFP, for providing feedback on and editing this manuscript.

Notes

  • The above letter was referred to the author of the article in question, who offers the following reply.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barreto TW,
    2. Eden AR,
    3. Petterson S,
    4. Bazemore AW,
    5. Peterson LE
    . Intention versus reality: fam med residency graduates' intention to practice obstetrics. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:405–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rayburn W
    . Who will deliver the babies? Identifying and addressing barriers. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:402–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html. Accessed September 5, 2017.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Deutchman ME,
    2. Sills D,
    3. Connor PD
    . Perinatal outcomes: a comparison between family physicians and obstetricians. J Am Board Fam Med 1995;8:440–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Avery DM Jr.,
    2. Graettinger KR,
    3. Waits S,
    4. Parton JM
    . Comparison of delivery procedure rates among obstetrician-gynecologist and family physicians practicing obstetrics. Am J Clin Med 2014;10:16–20.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Avery DM Jr.,
    2. Waits S,
    3. Parton JM
    . Comparison of delivery-related complications among obstetrician-gynecologists and family physicians practicing obstetrics. Am J Clin Med 2014;10:21–5.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Aubrey-Bassler K,
    2. Cullen RM,
    3. Simms A,
    4. et al
    . Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable. CMAJ 2015;187:1125–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rayburn WF,
    2. Petterson SM,
    3. Phillips RL
    . Trends in family physicians performing deliveries, 2003–2010. Birth 2014;41:26–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Peterson LE,
    2. Blackburn B,
    3. Phillips RL Jr.,
    4. Puffer JC
    . Structure and characteristics of family medicine maternity care fellowships. Fam Med 2014;46:354–9.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 31 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 31, Issue 1
January-February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Numbers Quandary in Family Medicine Obstetrics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Numbers Quandary in Family Medicine Obstetrics
Anne Worth
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2018, 31 (1) 167-168; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170378

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Numbers Quandary in Family Medicine Obstetrics
Anne Worth
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2018, 31 (1) 167-168; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170378
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Re: The Numbers Quandary in Family Medicine Obstetrics
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire