Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Re: Family Physicians' Knowledge of Commonly Overused Treatments and Tests

Kieran Walsh
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2015, 28 (1) 161-162; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140275
Kieran Walsh
BMJ Learning London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kmwalsh@bmj.com
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: Maurer et al1 outlined the results of a simple yet elegant study that shows family physicians' knowledge of commonly overused treatments and tests. At first glance, the article seems to demonstrate important gaps in knowledge; however, a detailed reading of the article gives cause for doubt.

Maurer et al1 and the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine should be lauded for publishing the actual multiple choice questions used in the study in the appendix of the article. Unfortunately, all the questions leave room for improvement. The second question offers the learner a binary choice: yes or no. Someone with no medical knowledge would have a 50% chance of getting this question correct. The test-wise candidate—who knows that he or she is undergoing an assessment to test his or her ability to “choose wisely”—might also feel prompted to give the answer that the examiner expects, and might thus choose the option with the least number of treatments or tests. The remaining questions ask the candidate to choose the most appropriate scenario for the question. Once again, this is less than optimal as it doesn't simulate clinical reality. Questions should ideally mimic clinical practice—hardly ever in clinical primary care medicine do 4 patients in a row present in relation to a possible Papanicolaou test (as in question 3). The other questions contain similar issues. These problems might seem minor; however, they may create questions that are not as valid and reliable as they should be. The art and science of constructing test questions has advanced over many years, and ignoring the advances that have been made seems a shortcoming.2

The good news is that the core content of the questions is likely to be sound and that judicious editing will make them valid and reliable. The questions could then be used in a variety of contexts outside the framework of the study. The questions, or questions like them, could be used efficiently and at low cost in formative or summative assessments, E-learning resources, or simply in promotional campaigns aiming to encourage wiser choices among physicians.3 Increasingly, the single best answer to such questions might be no investigation, no drug treatment, and no surgery.

Notes

  • The above letter was referred to the author of the article in question, who offers the following reply.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Maurer D,
    2. Stephens M,
    3. Reamy B,
    4. Crownover B,
    5. Crawford P,
    6. Chang T
    . Family physicians' knowledge of commonly overused treatments and tests. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:699–703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Case S,
    2. Swanson D
    . Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2002.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Walsh K
    1. Sandars J
    . Cost-effective e-learning in medical education. In: Walsh K, ed. Cost-effectiveness in medical education. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Publishing; 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue 1
January-February 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Re: Family Physicians' Knowledge of Commonly Overused Treatments and Tests
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Re: Family Physicians' Knowledge of Commonly Overused Treatments and Tests
Kieran Walsh
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 28 (1) 161-162; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140275

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Re: Family Physicians' Knowledge of Commonly Overused Treatments and Tests
Kieran Walsh
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 28 (1) 161-162; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140275
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire