Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleArticle

Reflecting on 40 Years of Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine: Where Should the Future Lead Us? Reaction to the Paper by Perry A. Pugno, MD, MPH

Nikitas J. Zervanos
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2010, 23 (Supplement) S28-S29; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.S1.090294
Nikitas J. Zervanos
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I wish to applaud Perry for a well-thought out vision for the future of family medicine education.1 However, with all due respect, I am going to disagree on his proposal for a 4-year curriculum.

Although I retired from the directorship of our residency in 2002 and feel a bit out of the academic loop, I have emeritus status and still serve my patients in my 40-year-old, predominantly Greek-American practice and precept at our rural-based family practice center. As the currents of change swoop around me, I may be missing a beat or two, but I hope my argument will remain on target.

Let me begin by reflecting just a bit on our history. I have observed the future unfold as I witnessed the metamorphosis of general practice into family medicine. Remember, the shortage of physicians, especially in primary care, was a driving force for the creation of the new specialty. In 1960 we had fewer than 8000 allopathic and osteopathic school graduates, and <10% of our medical students were choosing general practice as a career. In 1965, with the enactment of the Social Security Act Title XVIII (Medicare) and Social Security Act Title XIX (Medicaid) entitlement programs, the demand for medical and health care services escalated. In the meantime, many communities were without their general practitioner, and the need for primary care physicians reached a crisis.

After the establishment of our specialty in 1969 came new Title VII primary care initiatives, which facilitated the growth of family medicine and incentivized internal medicine and pediatrics to create primary care tracts as well as educational institutions to train new health practitioners. However, the demand for traditional specialists also intensified.

Although it has been 40 years since our specialty took root, the reasons for its inception and the arguments for why family medicine is so important have not changed. There was general agreement that we needed no less than 25% of the growing number of new graduates in family medicine. We then changed that to no less than 50% in primary care, to include family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, and even obstetrics and gynecology. Today, with >22,000 allopathic and osteopathic graduates, the family practice number should be exceeding 5,000 new trainees. We have never met our targets.

Times have changed and we have changed, and the need for more of us has grown. Few of us are in a solo practice (many more are in a group practice); more of us are employed and work fewer hours; many no longer practice fee for service; more of us want fixed hours of employment with more time available to be devoted to recreational and family activities; and more of us just want to work part time. In the meantime, lifestyles have improved and incomes have escalated and the new model of family medicine promises a more cost-effective patient-centered medical home.

Essentially, our specialty advocates first contact and personalized, continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive health care. Yet, as Perry points out, because of competing curriculum requirements, residents’ time in the family practice center is curtailed and continuity is compromised. Expanding residency training to 4 years would allow more concentrated time in the family practice center and facilitate the continuity experience while enhancing teaching and scholarly opportunities.

However, I don’t think this is necessary or even desirable for the following reasons:

  1. Residents maintain continuity with a sufficient number of their patients during 3 years.

  2. The “team” concept within the patient-centered medical home is already in place and adds another level of continuity.

  3. The integration of the electronic medical record has enhanced the coordination of preventive medical services.

  4. Certificates of added qualifications in Geriatrics, Adolescent Medicine, Sports Medicine, Sleep Medicine, or Hospice and Palliative Medicine already add a fourth year and opportunities for customized education.

  5. A certificate of added qualification in Maternity Care should be created and the requirements in obstetrics and gynecology should be revised to accommodate those residents who choose to deliver or not to deliver babies.

  6. Teaching does occur and scholarly activity is required. I suggest it begin in the middle of the first year and completed by the middle of the third year.

  7. Experience tells me that residents are ready to enter practice by the time they complete a 3-year residency.

  8. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, 4 years of residency training not only increases the cost of graduate medical education but it delays by one more year a needed family physician entering community practice, and hence accentuates the physician shortage.

Seven years have lapsed since I stepped down after 33 years as a program director, but I hope that does not make me a “fuddy-duddy” and that you will consider my apology to retain the 3-year residency as apropos.

Acknowledgments

I want to thank Jim Puffer, Larry Green, and the Board of Family Medicine for the opportunity to share my thoughts with you.

Notes

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflict of interest: none declared.

Reference

  1. ↵
    Pugno PA. One giant leap for family medicine: preparing the 21st-century physician to practice patient-centered, high-performance family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23(Suppl): S23–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (Supplement)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue Supplement
March-April 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reflecting on 40 Years of Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine: Where Should the Future Lead Us? Reaction to the Paper by Perry A. Pugno, MD, MPH
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Reflecting on 40 Years of Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine: Where Should the Future Lead Us? Reaction to the Paper by Perry A. Pugno, MD, MPH
Nikitas J. Zervanos
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2010, 23 (Supplement) S28-S29; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.S1.090294

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reflecting on 40 Years of Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine: Where Should the Future Lead Us? Reaction to the Paper by Perry A. Pugno, MD, MPH
Nikitas J. Zervanos
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2010, 23 (Supplement) S28-S29; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.S1.090294
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Reference
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family Medicine at 40 Years of Age: The Journey to Transformation Continues
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Transforming Family Medicine Research: Strategic Planning, Summits, and a Special Issue
  • Every Day I Write the Book: Transforming EHR Data from Daily Practice into New Knowledge
  • The Role of PhDs in Family Medicine Research
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire