|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
From the Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Eric M. Matheson, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 295 Calhoun Street, Charleston, SC 29425 (E-mail: matheson{at}musc.edu)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: An analysis was performed of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II Mortality Cohort.
Results: Controlling for age, gender, race, alcohol use, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, and body mass index, patients with positive allergy skin testing had a hazard ratio for stroke mortality of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.01–2.40) versus those without positive allergy testing. Patients with both positive allergy testing and an atopic respiratory condition had a hazard ratio for stroke mortality of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.13–4.73).
Conclusions: Individuals with both positive allergy skin testing and an atopic respiratory condition have more than a 2-fold increased risk of fatal stroke. This novel risk factor has substantial implications for a large segment of the population not previously considered at risk.
In an effort to expand the understanding of stroke risk factors, researchers have investigated the link between stroke and a number of chronic diseases. One promising area of investigation has been research examining the relationship between atopic respiratory conditions and stroke. Asthma, a disease strongly tied to atopy, was associated with a 50% increase in combined fatal and nonfatal stroke risk.4 Building on the notion that atopy may be a risk factor for stroke, we found that a history of physician-diagnosed hay fever was associated with more than a 70% increase in combined fatal and nonfatal stroke risk.5 Because hay fever may have some misclassification as an indicator of atopic sensitivity, it is unclear whether the relationship between atopic respiratory conditions and stroke exists with a more systematic measure of atopy such as allergy skin testing. To clarify this issue, we examined the risk of stroke mortality in patients with positive allergy skin testing in a nationally representative cohort. We then subdivided the group of patients with positive allergy skin testing into those with a history of atopic respiratory conditions (hay fever and/or asthma) and those without atopic respiratory conditions.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NHANES II Mortality Study was a prospective cohort study comprising 9252 adults between the ages of 30 and 75 and done at the time of the original NHANES II study.7 Deaths were captured by linking information from the National Death Index to matching personal identifiers in the NHANES II. Based on previous studies, more than 90% of all deaths can be identified by using this method.8,9 In our study, we followed patients 45 years of age and older from 1976 through December 31, 1992 (Table 1). We did not include patients younger than 45 years of age because the pathophysiology of strokes in that population differs significantly from those older than age 45. In individuals
45 years of age, 42.7% of all strokes are either subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhages, whereas in individuals >45 years of age these comprise only 15.7% of strokes.10
|
Allergy Testing
For the purposes of our analysis, all patients who reported a history of positive allergy skin testing were included in the group with positive allergy skin testing. Those who did not report a history of positive allergy skin testing underwent allergy skin testing and were included in the positive allergy skin testing group if they had a positive allergy response to one or more of the tested allergens. Allergy testing was performed using a traditional "skin prick test" administered in a sterile fashion with a 25 gauge, 3/8-inch needle. The allergens tested included Alternaria (a common fungus), Bermuda grass, cat, dog, house dust, mixed long and short ragweed, oak, and perennial rye grass. Histamine served as the control. After administration of the allergens, readings for wheal and flare reactions were made at 10 minutes and again at 20 minutes.11 For the purposes of our analysis, we considered a test positive if a wheal and flare reaction occurred or if a flare reaction of greater than 5 mm developed with any of the allergens tested.
Stroke Mortality
Stroke mortality was determined using death certificates through the National Death Index. We used the International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision codes 430 to 438 for stroke mortality.
Control Variables
Several control variables have been identified as risk factors for stroke mortality and thus may be potential cofounders of any relationship between positive allergy skin testing and stroke mortality.12–17 Control variables in our study included age, sex, race, body mass index (body weight in kg/height in m2), hyperlipidemia (defined as low-density lipoproteins
160 mg/dL), diabetes, hypertension, and smoking. Age and body mass index were treated as continuous variables. Sex, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking were treated as categorical variables. Hyperlipidemia was defined as a low-density lipoprotein level
160 mg/dL, and patients were categorized as either being hyperlipidemic or nonhyperlipidemic. Diabetes was determined by self-report and patients were categorized as either diabetic or nondiabetic. Hypertension and smoking were also categorized by self-report and patients were categorized as either hypertensive or normotensive and as either a current smoker or current nonsmoker, respectively.
Analysis
Because of the complex sampling design of the NHANES II, we used the statistical packages SUDAAN (SUDAAN Statistical Software Center, Research Triangle Park, NC) and SAS (SAS Inc., Cary, NC) to perform all analyses. We excluded participants with a history of stroke or coronary vascular disease because of their extremely high risk of death from recurrent stroke.17 We used
2 analysis to examine the bivariate relationships between participants with positive allergy skin testing and those with negative allergy skin testing for each of the categorical control variables. T tests were computed to examine the relationship between participants with positive allergy skin testing and those with negative allergy skin testing for each of the continuous control variables. We used a Cox proportional hazards regression to model time to stroke mortality, adjusting for age only. We used age as a covariate (1) because the prevalence of positive allergy skin testing decreases with age and (2) because stroke prevalence increases with age.18,19 For example, in our current dataset, if we compare patients aged 45 to 54 to those aged 65 to 74, the incidence of stroke increases by more than 850%, whereas the incidence of positive allergy skin testing decreases by 25%. Because of this relationship, if we fail to adjust for age we confound any relationship that may exist between positive allergy skin testing and stroke. After completing the preliminary regression we performed a fully adjusted regression with age, sex, race, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and hyperlipidemia as covariates. Because we were using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, we conducted a Schoenfeld's test to determine whether the hazards were proportional.20 After performing our primary analysis examining the relationship between positive allergy skin testing and risk of fatal stroke, we performed 2 further survival analyses using the same cohort. In the first analysis we performed a Cox proportional hazards analysis comparing the risk of fatal stroke for individuals with a reported history of respiratory atopy versus those without a history of respiratory atopy. We did not include allergy skin testing in this analysis. In the second analysis we performed a Cox proportional hazards analysis comparing the risk of fatal stroke for individuals with both a history of respiratory atopy and positive allergy skin testing versus the remainder of the cohort.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a survival analysis adjusting for age, patients with positive allergy skin testing had a hazard ratio (HR) for stroke mortality of 1.45 (95% CI, 0.93–2.25) versus those with negative allergy skin testing. A statistically significant relationship between positive allergy testing and risk of stroke mortality was found in a fully adjusted model (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.01–2.40), controlling for relevant confounding variables (Table 2). In a survival analysis adjusting for age, patients with a self-reported history of respiratory atopy had an HR for stroke mortality of 1.45 (95% CI, 0.76–2.80) versus those without a history of respiratory atopy. In a fully adjusted model, patients with a self-reported history of respiratory atopy had an HR for stroke mortality of 1.52 (95% CI, 0.80–2.92), controlling for relevant confounding variables (Table 2).In a survival analysis of individuals with both positive allergy skin testing and a history of respiratory atopy, we found an HR for stroke mortality of 2.11 (95% CI, 1.02–4.37) versus the remainder of the cohort, controlling for age. In a fully adjusted model, patients with both positive allergy skin testing and a history of respiratory atopy had an HR for stroke mortality of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.13–4.73), controlling for relevant confounding variables (Table 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Why might atopic respiratory conditions be a risk factor for future stroke? One potential explanation is that atopic respiratory conditions could exacerbate sleep apnea by increasing airway resistance through swelling of the respiratory mucosa.21 This may be important because sleep apnea is a noteworthy risk factor for stroke.22
Another possibility is that atopic respiratory conditions may increase the risk of stroke by increasing blood pressure.23,24 Although our analysis suggests that the association between atopic respiratory conditions and stroke remains even after controlling for a self-reported history of hypertension, blood pressure may still be important because, we suspect, atopic respiratory conditions raise blood pressure only intermittently during acute allergy attacks, which could easily be missed with typical blood pressure screenings. We also suspect that atopic respiratory conditions contribute to the so-called "upper airway resistance syndrome," which can cause increased blood pressure during sleep in otherwise normotensive individuals.25 We believe it is important to emphasize that patients can have upper airway resistance syndrome without meeting the formal definition of sleep apnea.26
During the past 2 decades, increasing evidence has linked variations in the expression of inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and 5-lipoxygenase, to stroke.27–32 Atopic respiratory conditions have also been linked to similar changes in IL-6, IL-10, and 5-lipoxygenase.33–36 Given these relationships, inflammation may be a critical link between atopic respiratory conditions and stroke.
This study has a few limitations of note. Stroke death was determined using death certificates rather than through direct imaging; however, because the attending physician is responsible for death certificate completion, he or she would presumably know how the patient died. In addition, participants who reported a history of positive allergy skin testing did not undergo allergy skin testing but were included in the allergy group. Because repeating previously positive skin allergy testing was not performed in the NHANES II, we included in the positive allergy skin testing group those individuals who stated that they had a previous positive skin test despite the lack of independent confirmatory testing. It is possible that this could overestimate the true number of individuals with positive allergy skin testing, but because misrepresentation of a previous positive skin test is not likely to be related to future stroke, we do not feel that this would have influenced our results. In addition, we hoped to investigate the relationship between allergies and stroke type (ischemic versus hemorrhagic), but we lacked sufficient power to perform this analysis. Finally, we were unable to determine how the use of antihistamines to treat respiratory atopy may be related to the risk of stroke because the NHANES II did not clearly delineate antihistamines from other allergy medications such as decongestants.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Funding: Supported by grant no. 5 D55HP05150 from the Health Resources and Services Administration.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Received for publication January 2, 2009. Revision received March 23, 2009. Accepted for publication April 1, 2009.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Bowman and A. V. Neale A Typical Day in the Family Medicine Office J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2009; 22(6): 597 - 599. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |