JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 22 (2): 223-224 (2009)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080242
© 2009 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teichman, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teichman, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Correspondence

Re: Predictive Value of Exercise Stress Testing in a Family Medicine Population

Peter G. Teichman, MD, MPA

FV Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Correspondence: keqfap{at}yahoo.co.nz

To the Editor: This study adds perspective to the role of exercise stress testing (EST) in triaging primary care patients with cardiac symptoms or risk factors. It also belies its first sentence, "Exercise stress testing (EST) is a screening test for coronary artery disease."1

Only 2.3% of the studied patients presented for screening. Another 31% of patients received EST for no listed indication or for pre-exercise evaluation. Though the retrospective study design limits our insight, it is more likely than not that these additional patients had cardiac symptoms or risk factors.

In this study, all patients with positive cardiac outcomes, regardless of EST results, had at least 1 risk factor. All asymptomatic patients had a very low or low pretest probability of coronary artery disease, with associated high negative predictive values (NPVs) of EST. Unless triage of at-risk (by symptoms or risk factors) primary care patients is conflated with screening (attempts to detect treatable presymptomatic disease), this combination of findings affirms both the effectiveness of EST in triage and the lack of effectiveness of EST in screening.

Notes

Dr. Newman declined to respond to this letter.

References

  1. Newman RJ, Darrow M, Cummings DM. Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population. J Am Board Fam Med 2008; 21(6): 531–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teichman, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teichman, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS