Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

The Case For A Broad Base

Mark K. Huntington
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2008, 21 (2) 171-172; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070259
Mark K. Huntington
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: The article by Dr. Whitcomb1 in the July–August issue was most interesting and timely. In discussing the future of family medicine, it is imperative that we as a discipline solicit input from those outside the specialty and from outside of the field of medicine, as he so eloquently stated, to ensure that the changes we contemplate are in the public's best interest. As physicians, our professional self-interest must take a back seat to what is best for our patients. The invitation to an intensivist to share his opinions on the future of our specialty in the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (JABFM) is an important step in the right direction. May this dialogue continue!

Dr. Whitcomb's observation regarding the strength and opportunities for our specialty in the area of outpatient care of chronic illness is most astute and indeed mandates increased focus in family medicine's training programs. However, the suggestion of changing the focus of the discipline to exclusively chronic disease management may not be in the best interest of either the public or of the specialty.

Family medicine has traditionally included a very broad-based training. Although individual family physicians often tend to narrow the scope of their practice over the years, they begin equipped for a wide range of practice possibilities. These “pluripotent stem cells”2 of the medical profession may later be found staffing emergency rooms, serving as hospitalists, and practicing occupational medicine, as well as in the stereotypical outpatient clinic. Family medicine is becoming a basis for global health activities, where a broad scope of clinical skills and knowledge are imperative. If Dr. Whitcomb's recommendations are followed, from where will broad-based training come? General internal medicine? Not according to Alan David's article3 in the same issue of the JABFM. Perhaps only general pediatrics will provide comprehensive training, but even their training is limited in maternity and geriatric care.

The dismissal of preparing broadly trained family physicians to practice in small and rural communities as an outmoded goal because “the great majority of residents will chose to practice in major metropolitan communities” is unfortunate and contrary to the lofty goal of ensuring “what would be best for the American public” voiced earlier in the article. Thirty percent of the American public live in communities with populations less than 50,000.4 These populations, already underserved, would find care much less accessible for the next generation should the training of future physicians preclude provision of comprehensive care locally.

It is true that the suburban family practice provider may not use the full scope of their training available in the current situation. However, it is difficult to envision how an abbreviated residency, devoid of inpatient or procedural training, equips providers differently than other, already extant career paths, eg, advance practice nurses.

A focus on chronic disease management, a field already moving in the direction of becoming primarily algorithm (“clinical guideline”) based, is unlikely to attract additional medical students to the discipline. Lacking either the adrenalin rush of some specialties, or the intellectual satisfaction of making the diagnosis and developing a plan of other specialties, the best and brightest will probably look elsewhere.

Our discipline is at a cross-roads. As Dr. David3 points out, we need a clear definition of our specialty. Are we to be “full-spectrum” physicians, or are we to be chronic disease specialists? Or perhaps family medicine is destined to be a discipline divided into 2 subspecialties: Comprehensivists5 and Outpatientists (alá Hospitalists)?

Notes

  • The authors declined to respond because they are in agreement.

References

  1. ↵
    Whitcomb ME. Preparing the personal physician for practice: meeting the needs of patients: redesigning residency training in family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20: 356–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Blake GH, Stockton MD. A 4-year family medicine residency program. Fam Med 2005; 37: 6–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    David A. Preparing the personal physician for practice: residency training in family medicine for the future. J Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20: 332–41.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Census 2000 Population Statistics. Available at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census/cps2k.htm. Accessed 21 November 2007.
  5. ↵
    Huntington MK. Comprehensive medicine (letter). J Gen Int Med 1999; 14: 205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 2
March-April 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Case For A Broad Base
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Case For A Broad Base
Mark K. Huntington
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 21 (2) 171-172; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070259

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Case For A Broad Base
Mark K. Huntington
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 21 (2) 171-172; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070259
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire