|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
From the Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Arch G. Mainous, III, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 295 Calhoun Street, Charleston, SC 29425 (E-mail: mainouag{at}musc.edu)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We conducted 3 focus groups (n = 28) in Charleston, South Carolina, with Latino adults (
18 years of age) recruited throughout the community: 12 women and 16 men, ranging in age from 18 to 52 years. All of the participants were immigrants, 89% noted Mexico as their country of origin. Focus groups were conducted in Spanish and audiotaped. Transcripts were translated into English and then translated back to Spanish to assure consistency of the language. Themes were identified using an editing style.
Results: Participants previous experiences in countries with limited restrictions on antibiotics influenced acquisition of antibiotics without a prescription in the United States. Participants believed that physician visits for a diagnosis and prescription were unnecessary when the patient was familiar with the symptom and it had previously responded to antibiotic treatment. Access to care was not reported to be a significant barrier to a physician visit when individuals felt they were "sick" or children were the patients. Participants reported using local tiendas (small stores in Latino neighborhoods that sell ethnically consistent and imported products) and importation of medication to meet their need for self-medication with antibiotics. The role of self-medication in the development of antibiotic resistance was essentially unknown among the participants.
Conclusions: Successful interventions to improve use of antibiotics need to be culturally sensitive to specific attitudes and behaviors found in the Latino population.
Health beliefs and practices are integrated into one's ethnic and cultural orientation.8–10 Some belief systems that have roots in Latin American cultures may encourage the overuse of antibiotics, particularly the use of nonprescribed antibiotics. Latinos are more likely than non-Latino whites to believe that antibiotics are necessary for their child's or their illness.11,12 That antimicrobials should be available without a prescription is a prevalent attitude among Latinos.13,14 Recent evidence in the Latino community in South Carolina indicates a high level of importation of antibiotics into, and the acquisition of antibiotics without a prescription in, the United States.14 Moreover, many respondents suggested self-medicating with antibiotics was preferable to going to the doctor.
The Latino population has historically been highly concentrated in certain metropolitan areas, such as New York and Los Angeles, and the southwestern United States. More recently however, this population has dispersed to states with smaller cities or more rural areas, such as South Carolina. The Hispanic population in South Carolina increased 211% from 1990 to 2000, making it the state with the fifth largest Latino growth during this period.15 However, because Hispanics overall make up only 2.0% of the population in this state, Latinos in South Carolina may have different strategies when seeking care and managing illness than individuals in more urbanized areas with a higher concentration of Latino populations. This focus group study elicited Latino adults experiences in treating common infections and acquiring treatments while capturing their reasons for using antibiotics as treatment.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years of age) were recruited through flyers placed at clinical sites, community centers and stores in Charleston, South Carolina. Individuals were volunteers and were not selected based on current illness. We conducted 3 focus groups with adult members of the Latino community to assess factors that may contribute to inappropriate use of antibiotics. Twenty-eight individuals (12 women and 16 men) with an age range from 18 to 52 years (mean age, 29 years) participated in one of 3 focus groups. Group attendance ranged from 5 to 12 participants. All of the participants were immigrants, with the vast majority (89%) having Mexico as their country of origin; participants also came from Guatemala (n = 2) and Honduras (n = 1). All but 2 of the participants (7%) were at least 15 years old when they arrived in the United States. All of the participants spoke Spanish as their native language. The participants had attained limited formal education; 15 had less than a high school degree and only one had more education than high school. Many of the participants were familiar with the US health care system, and 19 of 28 (68%) had visited a physician in the United States.
Data Collection
Data were collected over 3 months, between October and December 2006. Focus groups were conducted by a trained bilingual, Latino investigator and a bilingual assistant. All groups were conducted in Spanish, per participant preference. Demographic information was obtained via a survey. The investigator had a list of general and probing questions for pre-planned topics of discussion. These questions were adjusted for later groups based on trends and patterns requiring further elucidation. General topic questions used in the focus groups have been translated into English and are presented in Appendix 1. These general topic questions were asked in the context of the ongoing discussion. The group discussions were audiotaped and transcribed in Spanish, then translated into English and back-translated to ensure accuracy. The investigators also took field notes and participated in debriefings after the discussions.
Analysis
Transcripts were analyzed in a systematic manner by 3 independent investigators, 2 of whom were bilingual and 1 of whom was ethnicity concordant and spoke Spanish as her native language. To reduce the influence of preconceptions about the data, a commonly used interpretive form of analysis known as editing was used.16 This interpretive form of analysis involves searching for meaningful segments of text and organizing them into categories and themes. The aim of analysis was to find commonly recurring themes, trends, and patterns within group discussions relating to self-medication with antibiotics and the acquisition of antibiotics without a prescription. Words used, context, internal consistency, specificity of responses, and overlying themes were considered. Tone and nonverbal communication was assessed through the field notes. Saturation, which was determined by the redundancy of data and respondent validation of themes, occurred after 3 focus groups. Data collection was terminated once saturation was reached. N*VIVO software (QSR International, Cambridge, Mass.) was used to facilitate data abstraction and analysis. Members of the team reviewed the transcripts individually and then met on several occasions to compare segments of text from the transcribed interviews, explore the themes that emerged in the discussion, and reach consensus about interpretation of the text and themes.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Self-Medication with Antibiotics is Driven by Previous Experience with Antibiotics
The first theme to emerge was related to participants previous success with antibiotics. When they get symptoms that they have experienced before, they seek the treatment that seemed successful during prior episodes of those symptoms. The participants reported that for the first episode of a specific illness they had usually sought medical care and a diagnosis from a health care worker, many times a pharmacist. They felt comfortable with a self-diagnosis if they had a subsequent episode with a similar symptom complex. Thus, self-medication seems appropriate because they are relying on previous experience with similar symptoms to identify the condition, diagnosis, and treatment. This search for previously used treatments even extended to the desire to self-medicate with injectable antibiotics gained without a prescription, a behavior with substantial public health implications.
Barriers for Treating a Simple Illness: a Physician Visit is Not Worth Dealing With
The next theme to emerge was one of ambivalence toward a physician consultation for the treatment for common infections. Cost of care and language barriers were weighed against the benefits of a physician visit for these seemingly uncomplicated illnesses. The participants noted that they would seek a physician consultation in an emergency or for something serious. However, because they knew what needed to be done for this condition, the extra cost and language barriers seemed excessive. Moreover, when some participants had some concerns about the veracity of their self-diagnosis they called health care providers in Mexico to provide an expert opinion. This was still seen as easier and less expensive than seeing a physician in the United States.
A Physician Visit is Necessary for the Diagnosis and Treatment for Children
As opposed to the self-management strategies that the participants would use for themselves, they felt that it was important to consult with a physician for diagnosis and treatment of children. Adults have previously been diagnosed and treated for this recognizable symptom complex so they feel comfortable in bypassing a physician visit before obtaining treatment. Children, on the other hand, cannot verbalize well and have no frame of reference or experience in which to place this current illness, thereby necessitating the need for physician diagnosis.
Informal Strategies Used to Facilitate Access to Antibiotics
The participants noted a variety of strategies that they used to obtain antibiotics instead of the usual US system of obtaining a prescription from a health care provider. These included having relatives acquire antibiotics without a prescription in Mexico and then mail them to the participants, bring antibiotics into the United States with them and use local tiendas (small stores in Latino neighborhoods that sell ethnically consistent and imported products) to acquire antibiotics without a prescription. The respondents seemed to recognize that having the tiendas sell antibiotics without a prescription was against US law, but because the practice was consistent with Mexican culture they did not seem troubled by this behavior. These strategies were seen as ways of bypassing what the participants considered to be an expensive and excessively regulated system in an effort to obtain treatment for common problems.
People Realize There are Some Personal Risks to Antibiotic Use but no Public Health Implications
The participants voiced an understanding of the acute risk with the use of antibiotics, specifically allergic reactions that could lead to rashes and even death. However, there was little to no awareness of the concept of antibiotic resistance. One participant who had some health care training could explain the concept of antibiotic resistance and another participant talked about the body growing tolerant to antibiotics. These attitudes and knowledge seem to drive the desire for an initial diagnosis and concern about the first use of antibiotics for that condition, but fear or concern regarding repeat antibiotic use was greatly diminished.
Encouragement to See a Doctor Before Using Antibiotics Viewed as a Positive Strategy to Decrease Self-Medication
The group participants commonly voiced a suggestion that the best message to the Latino community regarding antibiotics is that they need to go to the doctor to get a consultation on the illness rather than treating themselves. However, that message is constrained by the real-life barriers and constraints of this population's ability to receive health care. Furthermore, this proposed strategy is intertwined with the belief that a doctor visit is unnecessary and simply a mechanism to financially enrich the doctor. The message that the participants suggested might be the most effective was to encourage a doctor visit because of the risk of drug complications and allergic reactions when self-medicating.
The results suggest the interplay between previous experience, barriers to care experienced by this population, and the complexity in crafting potential interventions to address this behavior and encourage appropriate antibiotic use.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These results are troubling from a public health standpoint with regards to both appropriate diagnosis and treatment, yet they are not unexpected. It would be expected that when patients are diagnosed and given a treatment for a condition, after the use of which they are better, they would consider that diagnosis to be correct and the treatment effective. It would be unrealistic to believe that patients would disregard previous experience in seeking care and treatment expectations every time they have a respiratory infection.13,17–19 Consequently, a desire for antibiotics previously used to treat respiratory infections is not a Latino-specific cultural phenomenon. However, the use of a variety of strategies, including acquiring antibiotics without a prescription from tiendas and pharmacies within the United States, does seem to be a cultural artifact of the loosely regulated sale of antibiotics in Latin America.20 This practice has appeared in cities such as New York, with longstanding Latino populations, and is present in cities like Charleston, which have seen the relatively recent influx of Latinos.
This study adds to the growing body of knowledge about the need to devise effective interventions to deal with the self-medication of antibiotics in the Latino community.19 Currently, there are no published results of interventions to combat this behavior, which has significant implications for the development of antibiotic resistance and public health.21 Education about any sort of intervention to promote the use of appropriate channels for acquiring antibiotics and to decrease inappropriate self-medication seems necessary, but a strategy of educating individuals about the differences between viruses and bacteria in the etiology of upper respiratory infections would probably not be effective. The participants base their desire for antibiotics not on the perceived etiology of the illness but on previously successful, or perceived successful, treatment for an infectious symptom complex. Thus, they are not looking to treat bacteria versus viruses but rather to alleviate symptoms. Furthermore, educational interventions for physicians will have to be done with care because most of the care seeking by this population is outside of the formal medical sector.
A multifactorial strategy focusing on the need to see a doctor before self-medicating with antibiotics is a logical step based on these findings. A message that focuses on the potential risks of self-medicating with antibiotics would seem to have an increased chance for success. Because of this unique cultural strategy of bypassing the formal health care system to obtain antibiotics, we have been working with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Get Smart program, as well as the South Carolina Department for Health and Environmental Control, on the development of educational materials for the Latino patient community. The present data indicate that translating currently used pamphlets on antibiotic use into Spanish would miss the entire process of self-medication with antibiotics acquired without a prescription. New patient educational materials, termed "Solo con receta" ("Only with prescription"), were developed with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and are being disseminated as an adjunct to radio and television health programs and as public service messages in Spanish-language media.
Another strategy that may work would be to disseminate the messages via a promotore program. Promotores can act as a liaison to the Latino community and disseminate information about the appropriate management of disease and activities for prevention. These promotores can provide culturally sensitive educational materials to patients and can help the community to connect with the health system and overcome conflicts in health beliefs and communication.
One concern about conceptualizing an intervention for the Latino community is the assumption that people who are from a variety of countries in Central America, South America, and the Caribbean can all be lumped into a general rubric of Latino. The present results from a community that has seen a relatively recent surge of Latino immigration, primarily from Mexico, are consistent with those from a recent study using focus groups of Latinos in New York City, who were primarily from the Dominican Republic.19 This suggests that although cultural differences among Latino groups do exist and community structures may vary, this behavior of self-medication with antibiotics may be common to the general Latino community. One difference evident between the primarily Mexican participants in our study and the Dominicans in New York City was the reliance on the importation of antibiotics with Mexicans, whereas the availability of antibiotics without a prescription at bodegas in New York seems to be a more accepted strategy for acquiring treatment. As the Latino community grows in Charleston, more outlets for acquiring antibiotics without a prescription may appear.
This study has several limitations. First, this study only involved community members and did not include proprietors of tiendas or other suppliers of antibiotics without a prescription. Such suppliers may provide further insight into the strength of the cultural acceptance of this process, which is inconsistent with US health care regulations. The study did achieve saturation from community members who self-medicate with antibiotics. The owners of the tiendas are not known users of antibiotics without a prescription and the rationale for this study was to explore the motives and experiences of the users of unprescribed antibiotics. However, future studies focusing on drug suppliers can help to explain other aspects of how the phenomenon persists (eg, How do they get the antibiotics into the country?, Are they scrutinized by the Food and Drug Administration or law enforcement?, To whom do they decide to sell antibiotics without a prescription?). A second limitation is that the participants are all immigrants to the United States. Second generation Latinos may have different behaviors and attitudes toward self-medication with antibiotics.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appendix 1. Issues Discussed in Focus Groups Related to the Use of Antibiotics Obtained Without a Prescription (English translation) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Probe: Give a recent example tell your story.
Probe: Where did you learn to treat that illness with antibiotics? mother, doctor (here or there), pharmacist (here or there), friend.
Probe: Where did you get them?
(Ask about tiendas)
Probe on differences based on length of time in United States
Why did you self-medicate with antibiotics without seeing a doctor?
Probe on barriers: time, money, insurance, transportation, language, believe it to be unnecessary.
Would you treat your children the same way you treat yourself?
What is your attitude toward the use of antibiotics without a prescription?
Probe: Saves money, convenience, no risk in the use of the medications
What are the risks/bad things related to the inappropriate use of antibiotics?
Probe: If none, then would their beliefs change if the thought that antibiotics could cause them to get diarrhea, infections that cant be cured?
How should we teach people to use antibiotics appropriately?
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Funding: This work is funded in part by the Blue Cross-Blue Shield Foundation of South Carolina, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the National Institute on Aging (1 P30 AG21677).
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Received for publication June 8, 2007. Revision received August 20, 2007. Accepted for publication August 24, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Bowman, A. V. Neale, and P. Lupo Inside the March/April 2008 Issue and the Most Frequently-Read Articles in 2007 J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2008; 21(2): 87 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |