|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
From the Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Evans, GA (DAS); and Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA (JE)
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Dr. Dean A. Seehusen, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 212 Bainbridge Road, Evans, GA 30809 (E-mail: dseehusen{at}msn.com)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A total of 301 patients at an outpatient pharmacy completed a survey about medication disposal practices and beliefs.
Results: More than half of the patients surveyed reported storing unused and expired medications in their homes, and more than half had flushed them down a toilet. Only 22.9% reported returning medication to a pharmacy for disposal. Less than 20% had ever been given advice about medication disposal by a health care provider. Previous counseling was highly associated with returning medications to a pharmacy (45.8% vs 17.1%, P < .001) and was the variable most associated with returning medications to a provider (28.8% vs 10.0%, P < .001). Previously counseled respondents were significantly more likely to believe that returning medications to a pharmacy (91.5% vs 60.3%, P < .001) or a medical provider (74.6% vs 47.3%, P < .001) was acceptable.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that there is a role for patient education about proper disposal of unused and expired medications.
Unused and expired medications are likely managed in a wide variety of ways. Hoarding expired medications in the home or giving them to friends and family may increase the risk of accidental or inappropriate ingestion. Disposal of unwanted medications by rinsing them down a sink, flushing them down a toilet, or throwing them in the trash may also be common.3 Although a few pharmacies will take unused and expired medications back to facilitate proper disposal of them, the majority will not.4
Numerous medications have been found in trace amounts in groundwater, surface bodies of water, and drinking water,5 and in recent years, the existence of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites in water has been recognized as potentially dangerous.6,7 Acetaminophen, verapamil, and estradiol are just a few of the chemical routinely found in American waterways.4
Unfortunately, current water treatment systems do not remove many pharmaceuticals from drinking water.7,8 Usually the concentration of these medications are negligible; however, long-term exposure to even low levels of multiple medications could be hazardous.5,9,10 Excretion, through urine and feces, is the primary way in which medications and their metabolites enter the water system. The improper disposal of unused and expired medications represents another easily preventable source of pharmaceuticals entering water supplies.
The outpatient pharmacy at Madigan Army Medical Center, on Fort Lewis, WA, has a policy of allowing patients to "return" unused or expired noncontrolled medications to facilitate disposal of these medications by treating them as medical waste. Patient instruction sheets provided with each medication identify this as the preferred method of disposal. Patients at Madigan may also return unused or expired noncontrolled medications to a provider for proper disposal. This study was conducted to identify patients disposal habits and explore patients beliefs about disposal methods.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A convenience sample of patients was obtained using the outpatient pharmacy waiting room at Madigan. Patients entering the pharmacy were invited to complete an anonymous 22-question survey on computerized kiosks in the waiting room. Before answering questions, the program informed subjects that, for the purposes of this survey, the term "medication" meant prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, supplements, vitamins, and herbals. The program encouraged all questions to be answered, thereby minimizing missing data. All respondents were either active duty military personnel, retired military, or military family members.
The collected data were downloaded into SPSS version 12.0 for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to categorize patients habits and beliefs. Categorical responses were dichotomized to allow hypothesis testing due to the small numbers of some responses.
2 analysis was used for comparative statistics.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Age, gender, race, number of recent visits to the pharmacy, number of unused or expired medications in the home, and number of medications patients were taking generally did not affect respondents past disposal habits or beliefs. Notable exceptions to this finding included: non-Hispanic whites were much more likely to report storing medications in their homes (63.7% vs 39.7%, P < .001) and more likely to believe that it is acceptable to rinse medications down a sink (24% vs 16.7%, P = .04) than other races. Patients who had two or more visits to the pharmacy in the previous 3 months were more likely to report returning medication to the pharmacy (28.6% vs 12.6%, P = .002), were more likely to report flushing medication down a toilet (58.2% vs 44.7%, P = .03), and were more likely to believe that it was acceptable to return medications to the pharmacy (73% vs 54.5%, P = .004).
Previous counseling by a health care provider on how to properly dispose of medications and having more recent visits to the pharmacy were highly associated with returning medications to a pharmacy (see Table 3). Previous education about medication disposal was the variable most associated with returning medications to a medical provider (P < .001; see Table 3). Having fewer medications in the home and currently being on more medications were also positively associated with returning medications to a provider, while more recent visits to the pharmacy was nearly statistically significant (P = .05).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some household hazardous waste facilities will accept unused medications. Another solution is disposal in a landfill as long as proper precautions are taken.11,12 Our study did not explore how patients used landfills to dispose of medications. Disposal into the sewage system is the least desirable option.4
Our sample reported a relatively high rate of returning medications to a pharmacy. Kuspis and Krenzelok3 surveyed 500 callers to a US poison information center, finding that only 1.4% reported returning expired medications to a pharmacy. The more typical disposal methods were throwing out in the trash (54%), flushing down a toilet or rinsing down a toilet or sink (35.4%), and not disposing of them (7.2%). A more recent study of 392 patients in southeastern England, where legal obstacles are much fewer, found that 21.8% of respondents returned unwanted medications to pharmacies.13
The results of this study suggest that there is a role for patient education on the proper disposal of unused and expired medications. Previous education was highly associated with the prior "return" of medications to a pharmacy or a provider for proper disposal. Since frequent visits to the pharmacy were associated with previous returns to a pharmacy and currently being on more medications was associated with previous returns to a provider, patient education may be a factor. Visits to the pharmacy can provide opportunities for patient education.
More conclusive are the findings that previous counseling by a health care provider was positively associated with the beliefs that it is acceptable to return unused or expired medications to a pharmacy or a provider and the belief that it is not acceptable to store medications in the home. Getting patients to believe that it is acceptable and desirable to return medications to the pharmacy is a necessary first step to getting patients to actually bring them back for proper disposal.
There are several possible ways that this education could be conducted. For example, providers and pharmacy personnel could discuss medication disposal with patients, and written education could be distributed with medications in a manner similar to what was described above. Or, innovative solutions, such as placing disposal information on medication labels or pill bottles, might prove effective.10 Future research should focus on how to most effectively educate patients on proper disposal techniques.
There are weaknesses in this study. An accurate response rate could not be calculated. It should also be kept in mind that reports of previous practices are subject to recall bias and may not be accurate. The study sample was drawn from the patients of one hospitals outpatient pharmacy. The patients were all military beneficiaries living in the Pacific Northwest. It is unclear how well these findings can be generalized to a wider population.
The presence of pharmaceuticals in groundwater, lakes, rivers, and even drinking water is a problem that will continue to grow as the population expands and more medications are dispensed. The environmental significance and human health risk that this represents is hotly debated, and the true risk may not be known for years.10,1418 In the meantime, it is prudent to minimize the contamination as much as possible, and the improper disposal of unused and expired medications is one area where a difference could be made. Educating patients on proper medication disposal can affect patients beliefs about medication disposal and is the first step toward changing their behavior. For pharmacies that do facilitate the proper disposal of unwanted medications, it appears that patient education can positively affect patients disposal behaviors.
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Disclaimer: The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of Defense.
Received for publication February 5, 2006. Revision received July 29, 2006. Accepted for publication August 3, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Herring, S. K. Shah, S. K. Shah, and A. K. Gupta Current Regulations and Modest Proposals Regarding Disposal of Unused Opioids and Other Controlled Substances J Am Osteopath Assoc, July 1, 2008; 108(7): 338 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |