HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Rapid Responses: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Norris, T. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Norris, T. E.

Challenges for Family Medicine and for Family Physicians

Department of Family Medicine
University of Washington Physicians Network
University of Washington
Seattle

To the Editor: One of the challenges for family medicine and for family physicians who are committed to research and publishing is that our discipline, more than almost any other, is practice-based. Unlike many medical and surgical subspecialties, we were not born in a laboratory. Following this line of logic, it is clear that much of the research that attempts to answer important questions in family medicine must be done in our community-based practices. This reality creates a dilemma, because most trained and experienced researchers and writers in family medicine are based in medical schools or residencies, not in the real-world practice sites that could help answer our questions.

Several approaches have been successfully used to deal with the frequently encountered mismatch in location between practice-oriented family physicians and research-oriented family physicians. One of the best known approaches has been the regional (or national) research network, in which a large number of practices have been linked to an academic center (or network hub), to address problems in an organized fashion. The recent Edwards and Norris article¹ illustrates another solution to the same problem. In this case, an inquisitive rural family physician in full-time practice contacted his regional medical school (Idaho is a participant in the University of Washington’s affiliated family practice residency network) seeking a collaborator. Once the right "match" was made, the community practice was able to provide the data, and the medical school faculty member was able to assist with research design, data analysis, and writing. This sort of partnership has great potential in linking the community practice-based and the academic center-based members of our specialty. It offers a powerful model to assist in answering important practical "real-world" questions.

References

1. Edwards JK, Norris TE. Colonoscopy in rural communities: can family physicians perform the procedure with safe and efficacious results? J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 353–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Rapid Responses: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Norris, T. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Norris, T. E.