Brief ReportPolicy Brief
Practice-Based Innovations: More Relevant and Transportable Than NIH-funded Studies
Rebecca S. Etz, Karissa A. Hahn, Martha M. Gonzalez, Benjamin F. Crabtree and Kurt C. Stange
The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine November 2014, 27 (6) 738-739; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140053
Rebecca S. Etz
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RSE, MG); the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (KAH, BFC); and the Departments of Family and Community Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
PhDKarissa A. Hahn
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RSE, MG); the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (KAH, BFC); and the Departments of Family and Community Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
MPHMartha M. Gonzalez
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RSE, MG); the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (KAH, BFC); and the Departments of Family and Community Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
BABenjamin F. Crabtree
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RSE, MG); the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (KAH, BFC); and the Departments of Family and Community Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
PhDKurt C. Stange
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (RSE, MG); the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (KAH, BFC); and the Departments of Family and Community Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
MD, MPHAbstract
In 2003, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) created a translational science funding stream to foster widespread, practice-based dissemination of scientific evidence. A decade later, our study of a national cohort of innovative practices suggests that effective dissemination continues to be prevented by the limited biomedical focus of funded research, conventional research strategies, and failure to report contextual factors.
In this issue
The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine
Vol. 27, Issue 6
November-December 2014
Practice-Based Innovations: More Relevant and Transportable Than NIH-funded Studies
Rebecca S. Etz, Karissa A. Hahn, Martha M. Gonzalez, Benjamin F. Crabtree, Kurt C. Stange
The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine Nov 2014, 27 (6) 738-739; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140053
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Less AND More Are Needed to Assess Primary Care
- Evidence, Engagement, and Technology: Themes of and the State of Primary Care Practice-based Network Research
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Webinar Features 3 Journal of American Board of Family Medicine Practice-based Research (PBR) Articles
- Practice-based Research Networks at the Crossroads of Research Translation
- Who Will Establish a Proper Data Model for Family Medicine and Primary Care?