JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 21 (5): 458-460 (2008)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.080082
© 2008 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JABFM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, K. S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fink, K. S.

Special Communication

Value-Driven Health Care: Proceed With Caution

Kenneth S. Fink, MD, MGA, MPH

From the Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Kenneth S. Fink, MD, MGA, MPH, Med-QUEST Division, State of Hawaii Department of Human Services, P.O. Box 700190, Kapolei, HI 96709-0190 (E-mail: kfink{at}medicaid.dhs.state.hi.us)

Given the context of continually increasing health care expenditures, value-driven health care is a concept that is gaining attention. Optimizing quality and efficiency provides greatest value, and aligning financial incentives through, for example, pay-for-performance programs, is a strategy growing in popularity. Such programs lack evidence of effectiveness for improving health outcomes and may have the potential limitations of opportunity costs and further disenfranchisement of vulnerable populations. However our current health care system is unsustainable, and fundamental reform is indicated. Financial incentives may prove to be an effective strategy for improving quality and efficiency and deserve exploration, but pay-for-performance programs warrant further evaluation, with attention directed to identify and respond to any adverse unintended effects of these programs.



Related articles in JABFM:

The Patient-Centered Medical Home Movement—Promise and Peril for Family Medicine
John C. Rogers
JABFM 2008 21: 370-374. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. A. Bowman, A. V. Neale, and P. Lupo
The Medical Home, Health Services, and Clinical Family Medicine Research
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 367 - 369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. C. Rogers
The Patient-Centered Medical Home Movement--Promise and Peril for Family Medicine
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 370 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Board of Family Medicine.