JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 21 (5): 385-391 (2008)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.070040
© 2008 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, J. M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clark, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, J. M.

Original Research

The Association of Family Continuity with Infant Health Service Use

Elizabeth C. Clark, MD, MPH, John Saultz, MD, David I. Buckley, MD, MPH, Rebecca Rdesinski, MSW, Bruce Goldberg, MD and James M. Gill, MD, MPH

Department of Family Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Somerset (ECC)
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (JS, DIB, RR, BG)
Oregon Department of Human Services, Salem (BG)
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (JMG)

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Elizabeth C. Clark, MD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 Worlds Fair Drive, Somerset, NJ 08773 (E-mail: clarkec{at}umdnj.edu)

Purpose: Continuity of care is a fundamental component of family medicine that has been shown to improve health care quality. Family continuity, when different family members are seen by the same clinician or practice, has not been well studied.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicaid enrollees in Oregon using administrative data. Infants were determined to have family continuity if they received well-baby care at the same clinic as that in which their mothers received prenatal care.

Results: Of the 1591 infants identified for participation in this study, 749 (47.1%) had family continuity. Infants had a mean of 4.55 well-child visits, 1.23 emergency department visits, and 0.17 hospitalizations in the first 13 months of life. Multivariate analyses found that infants with family continuity had increased numbers of well-child visits (relative risk, 1.05; P = .041), increased numbers of emergency department visits (relative risk, 1.36; P < .0001), and no difference in the number of hospitalizations (relative risk, 0.85; P = .282) when compared with infants without family continuity.

Conclusions: Family continuity, when measured at the clinic level, is associated with a variable effect on infant health service use. This finding suggests that clinic-level continuity is not sufficient for achieving all the benefits of continuity.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. A. Bowman, A. V. Neale, and P. Lupo
The Medical Home, Health Services, and Clinical Family Medicine Research
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 367 - 369.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Board of Family Medicine.