JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 20 (5): 451-457 (2007)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060222
© 2007 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leeman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albers, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leeman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albers, L. L.

Original Research

Do Unsutured Second-Degree Perineal Lacerations Affect Postpartum Functional Outcomes?

Lawrence M. Leeman, MD, Rebecca G. Rogers, MD, Betsy Greulich, CNM and Leah L. Albers, DrPH

Department of Family and Community Medicine (LML), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RGR, BG, LML), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
School of Nursing (LLA), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Lawrence M. Leeman, MD, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC09 5040; 2400 Tucker NW, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (E-mail: lleeman{at}salud.unm.edu)

Background: To compare the postpartum pelvic floor function of women with sutured second-degree perineal lacerations, unsutured second-degree perineal lacerations, and intact perineums.

Methods: A prospective cohort of nurse-midwifery patients consented to mapping of genital trauma at birth and an assessment of postpartum pelvic floor outcomes. Women completed validated questionnaires for perineal pain and urinary and anal incontinence at 12 weeks postpartum and underwent physical examination to assess pelvic floor strength and anatomy at 6 weeks postpartum.

Results: One hundred seventy-two of 212 (80%) eligible women provided follow-up assessment data at 6 or 12 weeks postpartum. Women with an intact perineum (n = 89) used fewer analgesics (P < .002) and had lower pain scores at the time of hospital discharge than women with second-degree lacerations (sutured, n = 46; unsutured, n = 37; intact, n = 89) (P ≤ .02). The sutured group was more likely to use analgesics (52%) than the unsutured (35%) or intact (23%) groups at time of hospital discharge (P < .002), although pain scores were not different between sutured and unsutured groups. Postpartum reports of urinary or anal incontinence, sexual inactivity, or sexual function scores did not vary between groups. Weak pelvic floor exercise strength was more common among the women with second-degree lacerations compared with women with an intact perineum (53% vs. 28%; P = .03) but did not differ between sutured (58%) and unsutured (47%) groups (P = not significant). Likewise, perineal body or genital hiatus measurements did not vary between groups (P = not significant).

Conclusions: Women with sutured lacerations report increased analgesic use at the time of hospital discharge compared with women with intact perineums or unsutured lacerations. At 12 weeks postpartum, no differences were noted between groups regarding complaints of urinary or anal incontinence, sexual inactivity, or sexual function.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. A. Bowman and A. V. Neale
North American Primary Care Research Group President's Award
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2008; 21(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Board of Family Medicine.