HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Rapid Responses: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fagnan, L. J. Articles by Angier, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fagnan, L. J. Articles by Angier, H. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Characterizing a Practice-based Research Network: Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) Survey Tools

From Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Lyle J. Fagnan, MD, Oregon Health and Science University, Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Mail Code L222, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239 (E-mail: fagnanl{at}ohsu.edu)

Objective: To present the survey methods and instruments used to characterize a geographically and professionally diverse rural practice-based research network (PBRN).

Methods: A cross-sectional study of Oregon PBRN (ORPRN) member practices and clinicians using a 3-part survey including a survey of the practices, of clinician members, and an anonymous survey of clinician satisfaction.

Results: A total of 31 of 32 (97%) participating ORPRN practices completed the practice survey, 96 of 129 (74%) clinicians within these practices completed the clinician member survey, and 81 of 129 (63%) clinicians completed an anonymous survey of clinician satisfaction.

The survey provided a detailed description of the structure of member practices, patient and clinician demographics, services provided by the practices, and access to specialty and ancillary services.

Conclusions: Survey tools that describe the network practices and individual clinician characteristics contribute to an understanding of the research capacity of an individual PBRN.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. Sloane, R. J. Dolor, and J. Halladay Increasing the Role of Practice Networks in Medical Research J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2009; 22(4): 348 - 351. [Full Text] [PDF]