JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 20 (2): 196-203 (2007)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060114
© 2007 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kho, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kho, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

About Practice-Based Research Network

Information Technology in PBRNs: The Indiana University Medical Group Research Network (IUMG ResNet) Experience

Abel Kho, MD, MS, Atif Zafar, MD and William Tierney, MD

Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN (AK, AZ, WT)
General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (AK)
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN (AZ, AK, and WT)

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Abel Kho, MD, MS, General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60611 (E-mail: abel.kho{at}nmff.org)

Objective: Research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) is hampered by difficulty managing, identifying, and enrolling potential subjects. Well-designed informatics applications can greatly improve these processes.

Methods: We considered a literature review, discussion with PBRN researchers, and personal experience to outline important principles to apply when considering electronic data collection in a PBRN. We provide specific working examples of electronic means we use to improve data collection and patient enrollment.

Results: Our PBRN has screened more than 18,000 patients and enrolled more than 6000 study subjects in 5 years. Less than 2% of potentially eligible patients are missed by our research assistants. We achieved this high rate of success through extensive integration of the ResNet infrastructure (research databases and personnel) with an electronic medical record (EMR) system and computerized provider order entry. We make extensive use of widely used standards for data storage, definition, and transmission to ensure data reusability. We successfully implemented a real-time means to identify follow-up patients.

Conclusion: Electronic data collection can greatly facilitate PBRN research, particularly by improving data management and identification of eligible patients. Key principles to ensure successful implementation include use of data standards and centralized electronic data management.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Board of Family Medicine.