JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 20 (1): 28-35 (2007)
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060026
© 2007 American Board of Family Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saver, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Doescher, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saver, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Doescher, M. P.

Original Research

A Qualitative Study of Depression in Primary Care: Missed Opportunities for Diagnosis and Education

Barry G. Saver, MD, MPH, Victoria Van-Nguyen, BA, Gina Keppel, BA and Mark P. Doescher, MD, MSPH

Department of Family Medicine (BGS, VV-N, GK, MPD), University of Washington, Seattle, WA
School of Education (VV-N), University of Washington, Seattle, WA
School of Public Health (GK), University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Barry G. Saver, MD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Benedict Building A3-146, Worcester, MA 01655 (E-mail: Barry.Saver{at}umassmed.edu)

Purpose: Depression is one of the most commonly encountered chronic conditions in primary care, yet it remains substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated. We sought to gain a better understanding of barriers to diagnosis of and entering treatment for depression in primary care.

Methods: We conducted and analyzed interviews with 15 subjects currently being treated for depression recruited from primary care clinics in an academic medical center and an academic public hospital. We asked about experiences with being diagnosed with depression and starting treatment, focusing on barriers to diagnosis, subject understanding of depression, and information issues related to treatment decisions.

Results: Subjects reported many visits to primary care practitioners without the question of depression being raised. The majority had recurrent depression. Many reported that they did not receive enough information about depression and its treatment options. In the majority of cases, practitioners decided the course of treatment with little input from the patients.

Conclusions: In this sample of depressed patients, we found evidence of frequent missed diagnoses, substantial information gaps, and limited patient understanding and choice of treatment options. Quality improvement efforts should address not only screening and follow-up but patient education about depression and treatment options along with elicitation of treatment preferences.








HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Board of Family Medicine.