HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Rapid Responses: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dassow, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dassow, P. L. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value?

From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Paul Dassow, MD, MSPH, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, K-307, Kentucky Clinic, Lexington KY 40536 (E-mail: pdass1{at}email.uky.edu)

Background: Determining which patient outcome indicators may be appropriate to include in a primary care, practice performance tool is a difficult task. Unfortunately, no published studies currently document the opinions of these physicians regarding which indicators they most value.

Objective: To ascertain the level of agreement among primary care physicians regarding the most salient patient outcome indicators for measuring performance in primary care.

Methods: A random population survey of 115 adult primary care physicians. The survey consisted of a comprehensive list of health characteristics included in 8 validated instruments (eg, SF-36, Sickness Impact Profile), as well as 10 common clinical indicators and 6 health behaviors. Each item was ranked using a 5-point Likert scale regarding its value for inclusion in a performance measure.

Results: Analysis of 93 returned surveys (RR 81%) indicated strong agreement (75%) that 19 health characteristics were important or very important. These characteristics fit into 8 domains: physical functioning, psychological functioning, social functioning, pain, quality of life, physiologic symptoms, health behaviors, and clinical indicators. Notably absent were measures of social support and health perceptions.

Conclusions: Strong agreement exists among practicing primary care physicians regarding the most valued patient outcome indicators. Development of practice performance measures should be influenced by such data.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Lupo, A. V. Neale, and M. A. Bowman Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles in 2009 J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2010; 23(3): 280 - 282. [Full Text] [PDF]