JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, J. R.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 18:555-560 (2005)
© 2005 American Board of Family Practice

Brief Report

Effects of a Reduced-Visit Prenatal Care Clinical Practice Guideline

Christopher A. Partridge, MD and John R. Holman, MD MPH

From the Department of Family Medicine, US Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

Correspondence: Corresponding author: John Holman, MD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine, US Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055 (e-mail: jrholman{at}cpen.med.navy.mil)

Purpose: A prenatal care guideline that decreased scheduled visits to 9 was introduced at a military community hospital in 2000. We hypothesized patients would have fewer clinic visits with no difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes under the new schedule.

Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study involving patients who delivered after 20 weeks gestation during 1999 (1647) and 2000 (1710). We measured the number of antenatal visits to clinic and labor and delivery (L&D) per patient. We assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes. Power was adequate to detect a 25-g change in birth weight. Descriptive, {chi}2, and t test statistics were used.

Results: The number of prenatal visits decreased from 10.9 ± 2.8 to 9.2 ± 2.6 (P < .001) per patient. Outpatient visits to L&D increased by 31 per month, P = .01. Post-term deliveries decreased from 10.4 to 8.1%, P = .01. Maternal and neonatal outcomes did not decline. Patient satisfaction did not change.

Discussion: Application of the prenatal care guideline was associated with a reduction in prenatal visits but a small increase in L&D visits that did not persist after the initial year. No adverse perinatal or patient satisfaction outcomes were noted.

Conclusions: This guideline is efficient in delivering prenatal care with no changes in perinatal outcomes or patient satisfaction.






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Board of Family Medicine.