JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madlon-Kay, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by DeFor, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madlon-Kay, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by DeFor, T. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 18:307-311 (2005)
© 2005 American Board of Family Practice


Family Medicine and the Health Care System

Maternal Postpartum Health Care Utilization and the Effect of Minnesota Early Discharge Legislation

Diane J. Madlon-Kay, MD, MS and Terese A. DeFor, MS

From the Regions Family and Community Medicine Residency Program, St. Paul, Minnesota (DM), and HealthPartners Research Foundation, Bloomington, Minnesota (TD)

Correspondence: Corresponding author: Diane Madlon-Kay, MD, MS, 864 Arcade Street, St. Paul, MN 55106 (e-mail: madlo001{at}tc.umn.edu)

Purpose: To describe maternal postdischarge follow-up and health care utilization in the context of Minnesota’s early discharge legislation, which mandates coverage for a home visit for a mother and baby who voluntarily leave the hospital early.

Methods: Claims data from a large managed care organization were used to identify 22,944 women giving birth from January 1995 through February 1999. Study variables included home or clinic visits within 1 week of discharge (early follow-up), readmissions within 1 month of discharge, and urgent care or emergency department visits within 2 months of discharge.

Results: After enactment of Minnesota’s legislation, the percentage of mothers with short stays decreased from 52% to 16% for vaginal births and from 87% to 63% for cesarean births (P =.001). Overall, 33% of mothers with vaginal births and 40% with cesarean births had early home or clinic follow-up (P =.001). Mothers who stayed 0 or 1 hospital days after vaginal births were more likely to have early follow-up than those with longer stays (37% vs 32%, P =.01). However, mothers who stayed 2 or 3 days after cesarean birth were no more likely to have early follow-up than mothers who stayed 4 or more days (39% vs 42%, P =.08). Rates of early follow-up were significantly higher after enactment of Minnesota’s legislation, regardless of length of stay.

Conclusions: Implementation of Minnesota’s early discharge legislation corresponded with significantly increased lengths of stay and an increase in the percentage of mothers who received early follow-up visits. However the majority of mothers with short stays continued to lack early follow-up.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Board of Family Medicine.